Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:34756) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WBAho-0001wE-GD for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:36 -0800 Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id wm4sf238227obc.10 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ZqYdG6qI7ZtXE6SqdnVuj9rL20/7YfLzlwAKZDeWEyI=; b=n4jOqbq7flogh2gktCwJfUsxSJujolGpz6RyPFInCB2IbiJmRhEgllPgLYVEO31IZU WnZDLrUnFRxDmVj4EH5rNuN30iX7U6hpgkJmV+QkMjfAVXAptIyf89PQ8eYHTUZNCfeL XGyCDX7uJplQ6lmVrm5NfO1w9RZZB+tm63LZnIl/7NA64PQqFD52nhDnbEn/w507b4yo 2+7SY0XasS1USKbLVxiY/RE4NSoc3PLDLMN/tLkynxdT6kSYrl9zAPehxZrtKuxz/4mq LX2rZ/pbqbxAx0iTyz+SyRZf+6VLac3hgr8sCdPh3XfR/taPb5yR7f+4ucaPBYWB2p2M 7OWA== X-Received: by 10.140.89.211 with SMTP id v77mr95826qgd.27.1391638342401; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.22.139 with SMTP id 11ls322270qgn.84.gmail; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.127.199 with SMTP id d47mr2856927yhi.29.1391638342049; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-x235.google.com (mail-vb0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fp7si6909348vdc.1.2014.02.05.14.12.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235; Received: by mail-vb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p17so803680vbe.12 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.209.36 with SMTP id mj4mr336110vec.47.1391638341971; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:12:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.33.230 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:11:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F2A65A.8080309@gmx.de> References: <52F224EA.1000108@gmx.de> <52F2A65A.8080309@gmx.de> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:11:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Individuals and xorlo To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6b89c0774ce04f1b00d57 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7bd6b89c0774ce04f1b00d57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It seems to me that if you allow "pa xanto" or "pa lo xanto" to mean anything other than "one elephant" without relying on context, there's going to be a problem. stevo On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:00 PM, selpa'i wrote: > la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e > >> Using a property in zilkancu3 >> >> would probably be clearer for that reason. >> >> >> But "lo ka ce'u xanto" is a property of "lo ci xanto" as well as of >> "lo xanto", so I'm not sure it adds anything in that respect. "ka" does >> help people who don't like generic references, >> > > Personally, I don't mind generic references. > > > but I'm not sure it does >> anything more than "lo xanto" to specify the size of the unit. How would >> it help to say that you are counting by things that have the property >> "lo ka ce'u xanto" if among those things there's lo ci xanto as well as >> lo pa xanto? >> > > You're right, it doesn't help at all, because {lo ci xanto cu xanto}. > "to be an elephant" is a distributive predicate, but Lojban doesn't put > that job on the selbri. We could try: > > lo ci xanto cu xanto gi'e zilkancu li ci lo ka ro xo kau ce'u xanto > > And now I'd rather go back to {lo xanto} as the unit. :) > > > mi'e la selpa'i > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7bd6b89c0774ce04f1b00d57 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It seems to me that if you allow "pa xanto" or &qu= ot;pa lo xanto" to mean anything other than "one elephant" w= ithout relying on context, there's going to be a problem.=C2=A0
stevo


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:00 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:
la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Using a property in zilkancu3

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 would probably be clearer for that reason.


=C2=A0 But "lo ka ce'u xanto" is a property of "lo ci xa= nto" as well as of
"lo xanto", so I'm not sure it adds anything in that respect.= "ka" does
help people who don't like generic references,

Personally, I don't mind generic references.


but I'm not sure it does
anything more than "lo xanto" to specify the size of the unit. Ho= w would
it help to say that you are counting by things that have the property
"lo ka ce'u xanto" if among those things there's lo ci xa= nto as well as
lo pa xanto?

You're right, it doesn't help at all, because {lo ci xanto cu xanto= }.
"to be an elephant" is a distributive predicate, but Lojban doesn= 't put that job on the selbri. We could try:

lo ci xanto cu xanto gi'e zilkancu li ci lo ka ro xo kau ce'u xanto=

And now I'd rather go back to {lo xanto} as the unit. :)


mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--047d7bd6b89c0774ce04f1b00d57--