Received: from mail-yh0-f59.google.com ([209.85.213.59]:48001) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WBWZs-0008Nv-Me for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:34:02 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f59.google.com with SMTP id f10sf584530yha.14 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VcuqNBRIqukxIAgbgBm8hA3mZEP2t1rl9xOwjspVuyY=; b=HXOGYRZ90sUqFVqD6boDcDe/IVyFdQu80g7BoOzTqJ9dJW/Fh+2OiF+SbG/uChs14i YMgzChddXs9lmYBYU5hMH7eosSHvJz3P6lGy64Q6MErOfVFVyk2MCsWQvhhROLyZgR/d VgKNH7a7RRMT50wpQFgP5/ieRHM6mzbsLaFyBUJIj2rQPokE3fkbAa+rMbrBnNtecnRd DHjZvBEUbbwly1hjGWMQfSilPH7i7GbBxmudro64bUC7uw8fURK/aRxdzBy61JS5cJJP f3194TkZCmRxNhRtkrF5+TyMe4TdJFO4Vp6x+lY7WLXA7BFMbvHX9sQfrthwhFJTtDMy miAg== X-Received: by 10.182.3.12 with SMTP id 12mr24549oby.36.1391722417773; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.223.74 with SMTP id qs10ls299813obc.17.gmail; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.60.195 with SMTP id j3mr4333832obr.17.1391722417226; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-x230.google.com (mail-vc0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ys4si545264vdc.2.2014.02.06.13.33.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230; Received: by mail-vc0-x230.google.com with SMTP id la4so1938035vcb.35 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.161.78 with SMTP id xq14mr915872veb.51.1391722417138; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.8.195 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F372FF.1000201@gmx.de> References: <52F26B9E.2090001@gmx.de> <5e023b9a-515c-432b-a389-8f9af4766b51@googlegroups.com> <52F29ED8.1050607@gmx.de> <52F372FF.1000201@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 19:33:37 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Individuals and xorlo From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d7ad04ccf3304f1c3a08e X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:33 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .guskant. cu cusku di'e > >> >> If you suggest another short term for "something in a domain of plural >> variable, saying nothing about collectivity/distributivity", I would >> abandon my usage of "mass" in this meaning. >> > > A term that I've been using, but which doesn't seem to be very wide-spread > (yet?), is "individual-collection". Anything that can be expressed as {X > jo'u Y jo'u Z ...} is an individual collection and is identical to a {lo > broda} with those {jo'u}-connected referents. [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid --047d7b6d7ad04ccf3304f1c3a08e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:33 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .guskant. cu cusku di'e > >> >> If you suggest another short term for "something in a domain of plural >> variable, saying nothing about collectivity/distributivity", I would >> abandon my usage of "mass" in this meaning. >> > > A term that I've been using, but which doesn't seem to be very wide-spread > (yet?), is "individual-collection". Anything that can be expressed as {X > jo'u Y jo'u Z ...} is an individual collection and is identical to a {lo > broda} with those {jo'u}-connected referents. The problem with that, with whatever term is chosen in the metalanguage to talk about the language, is that the term eventually leaks into the language, and then collections become individuals too. That happened to "mass" very quickly, probably from the start, compounded with the problem that it was used for a lot of other things and not just for plural reference. I prefer to say that the domain of plural variables is just individuals, not something else, but that variables don't need to take one value at a time. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7b6d7ad04ccf3304f1c3a08e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:33 AM, selpa'i <<= a href=3D"mailto:seladwa@gmx.de" target=3D"_blank">seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .guskant. cu cusku di&#= 39;e

If you suggest another short term for "something in a domain of plural=
variable, saying nothing about collectivity/distributivity", I would abandon my usage of "mass" in this meaning.

A term that I've been using, but which doesn't seem to be very wide= -spread (yet?), is "individual-collection". Anything that can be = expressed as {X jo'u Y jo'u Z ...} is an individual collection and = is identical to a {lo broda} with those {jo'u}-connected referents.

The problem with that, with whatever term is chosen in = the metalanguage to talk about the language, is that the term eventually le= aks into the language, and then collections become individuals too. That ha= ppened to "mass" very quickly, probably from the start, compounde= d with the problem that it was used for a lot of other things and not just = for plural reference. I prefer to say that the domain of plural variables i= s just individuals, not something else, but that variables don't need t= o take one value at a time.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=A0=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--047d7b6d7ad04ccf3304f1c3a08e--