Received: from mail-ve0-f186.google.com ([209.85.128.186]:47454) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WBnk0-0005Eb-N6 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:34 -0800 Received: by mail-ve0-f186.google.com with SMTP id c14sf886017vea.13 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=QBJhJe0Rl8BwbNVpEXZafk8J1/w9Eb846R+LXd2MHMM=; b=qKflfKR5HEYs4/+/xSQygA4hBzJ0olAxLPNgCOs2WxolNSaAQfxmHr8J9V0vFkbv/J rJOVvOp8duy0awU0QjPmyFYkKMZIV7LojZ9SjrmJRvcBHW5m/HEN0byXN341AiQ3tV9n ec2EntEvjaoGPDRmK0ifFvqJmwo0lTLH2cPnfM6gt8onpSuSjrbpRgR24HBH4i6UPfUn PsoYGhG6O+4Hv1QZnqKpQY4kby+JzKSANi9ZCVhWBHlNAoy6BFvWHqpb61FXgausFXDg zeBl/48R7Ed49fthrr5eQs5Yyj0vovKnbxekjKyJxfrMFsxjrjZijpIXfETDeTA1AlMf 45Jw== X-Received: by 10.50.13.7 with SMTP id d7mr13694igc.16.1391788394337; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.9.40 with SMTP id w8ls652555iga.37.canary; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.253.9 with SMTP id zw9mr3295943pac.38.1391788393626; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10si50029qcg.3.2014.02.07.07.53.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e; Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id ii20so5422516qab.19 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.98.129 with SMTP id q1mr19112158qcn.3.1391788393497; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.3.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:53:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] {ny poi cy ke'a falcru} From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28f8acc08cb04f1d2fc69 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c28f8acc08cb04f1d2fc69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think I understand your question. Why wouldn't ny refer to "lo narge"? That is the antecedent (from "lo narge cu tai cmalu"). Or, are you perhaps meaning to refer to the SECOND use of "ny", and asserting it should now be reassigned to meaning "ny poi cy ke'a falcru"? --gejyspa On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis < felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > The full passage is: > {lo n=C3=A0rge cu tai cm=C3=A0lu .i ja'e bo ny poi cy ke'a f=C3=A0lcru = cu ja'a ru'e se > zm=C3=A0mei ny poi cy ke'a p=C3=B9nji lo l=C3=A0nka} > > Here, {ny poi cy ke'a falcru}, clearly means something equivalent to > either {lo narge poi cy ke'a falcru} or to what I would write as {lo me n= y > poi cy ke'a falcru}. To me, an anaphoric expression always has exactly th= e > same referent as the antecedent. What do you think? > > doi la selpa'i, what is your idea behind this usage? Do you think the > anaphora just occurs at the superficial textual level, so that {ny} would > be equivalent to {lo narge}? Or do you think that {ko'a poi broda} is > meaningful in general, so that {ko'a} can in effect refer to a strict par= t > of ko'a, i.e, as in {lo me ko'a}? > > mu'o > mi'e .asiz. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c28f8acc08cb04f1d2fc69 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0 I don't think I understand your question. =C2= =A0Why wouldn't ny refer to "lo narge"? =C2=A0That is the ant= ecedent (from "lo narge cu tai cmalu"). =C2=A0Or, are you perhaps= meaning to refer to the SECOND use of "ny", and asserting it sho= uld now be reassigned to meaning "ny poi cy ke'a falcru"?=C2= =A0

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0--gejyspa



On Sun, Ja= n 26, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis <<= a href=3D"mailto:felipeg.assis@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">felipeg.assis@g= mail.com> wrote:
The full pas= sage is:
=C2=A0 {lo n=C3=A0rge cu tai cm=C3=A0lu .i ja'e bo ny poi c= y ke'a f=C3=A0lcru cu ja'a ru'e se zm=C3=A0mei ny poi cy ke'= ;a p=C3=B9nji lo l=C3=A0nka}

Here, {ny poi cy ke'a falcru}, clearly means=20 something equivalent to either {lo narge poi cy ke'a falcru} or to what= I would write as {lo me ny poi cy ke'a falcru}. To me, an anaphoric expr= ession always has exactly the same referent as the antecedent. What do you = think?

doi la selpa'i, what is your idea behind this usage= ? Do you think the anaphora just occurs at the superficial textual level, s= o that {ny} would be equivalent to {lo narge}? Or do you think that {ko'= ;a poi broda} is meaningful in general, so that {ko'a} can in effect re= fer to a strict part of ko'a, i.e, as in {lo me ko'a}?

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--001a11c28f8acc08cb04f1d2fc69--