Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:45876) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WD0Mo-0006xN-9u for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:28 -0800 Received: by mail-ob0-f189.google.com with SMTP id wn1sf2011503obc.16 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=UI21vhAWd5rwI5VBkGq+rtlw51T3lsxnvhB4NLowfyc=; b=q7jySb5S3mbEf+DP0ao5Kb4JeREfFA7vO2nKcjrHh/MQBYUZKsB+U7xJL/3ahuvaya cajjF0RxJ+hl6iY71eEMzg9RC9kLP4zV/dTKGq8jYrvogHfJ/srZTWY6qj50uG8DVRSi AwhG2PWEROsYEQd5lrH9hfl6RBIa6RPrha9rTxC/OApweSnoxSB8KFmEpa8tqYvkQXEA yOo8yfj8uWwyv1QkjueX1sEiiXTAoUisK097bYYS3DCjqy/tVMpCtw8aYTNyYuuAq+t4 HZzba8SHfLuP8uGsZBDpLscltogUxDzuYcyKVLNRFsJLKQaFhvtTWrVOrr+rtvAAKuZb W5wQ== X-Received: by 10.182.103.195 with SMTP id fy3mr242859obb.1.1392075256108; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:16 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.240.129 with SMTP id wa1ls937299obc.79.gmail; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.34.169 with SMTP id a9mr163584obj.49.1392075255411; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gw3si603831qcb.2.2014.02.10.15.34.15 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a; Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k4so10856495qaq.29 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.11.196 with SMTP id u4mr53311988qau.4.1392075255274; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.3.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:34:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:34:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] {ny poi cy ke'a falcru} From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cba9617628f04f215c7da X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e013cba9617628f04f215c7da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, about the original question, I do think that you can use a basysu'i that encompasses an entire group or mass and then further specified downward by quantifiers or relative clauses/phrases to include only part of it. As for "ti poi toldi" vs "ti noi toldi" I see what you are asserting, but I can't hear "ti poi toldi" as anything other than "The subset of these that are butterflies...." and "ti noi toldi" as "this/these, which is/are a butterfly/butterflies...." -gejyspa On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas = wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis < > felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> When I say {ti poi toldi}, I am making it clear what I am pointing to, >> while when I say {ti noi toldi}, I expect you to understand what I am >> pointing to, and I am giving the information that it is a butterfly. In = the >> latter case, I might be presuming, for example, that you don't know that >> the colourful thing I am pointing at is in fact a butterfly. In the form= er, >> the information in the relative clause has a clear purpose: it is there = to >> clarify the reference. >> > > Good point. That's why I've always been uneasy with "ti poi toldi" as > opposed to "lo vi toldi". > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e013cba9617628f04f215c7da Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0 So, about the original question, I do think that yo= u can use a basysu'i that encompasses an entire group or mass and then = further specified downward by quantifiers or relative clauses/phrases to in= clude only part of it.

=C2=A0 As for "ti poi toldi" vs "ti noi toldi= " I see what you are asserting, but I can't hear "ti poi told= i" as =C2=A0anything other than "The subset of these that are but= terflies...." and "ti noi toldi" as "this/these, which = is/are a butterfly/butterflies...."=C2=A0

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0-gejyspa


On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:07 PM, J= orge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:



On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 = at 2:09 PM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com= > wrote:
=

When I say {ti poi toldi}, I= am making it clear what I am pointing to, while when I say {ti noi toldi},= I expect you to understand what I am pointing to, and I am giving the info= rmation that it is a butterfly. In the latter case, I might be presuming, f= or example, that you don't know that the colourful thing I am pointing = at is in fact a butterfly. In the former, the information in the relative c= lause has a clear purpose: it is there to clarify the reference.

Good point. = That's why I've always been uneasy with "ti poi toldi" as= opposed to "lo vi toldi".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--089e013cba9617628f04f215c7da--