Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::234;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKOEKkSVeL2k9Cu94Uac03hwr8ichWvC3Qf9x_1aXM4XF9R7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALMa68reZrUwdDBCRW61dUScvwmaw4uLvsjXyLwE38itWanKWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKOEKkSVeL2k9Cu94Uac03hwr8ichWvC3Qf9x_1aXM4XF9R7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:50:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CALMa68r=zwg9BWeUOU7EfwBXNM6vmqXvJ423SoMS5+SG-TyumA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] "three times as big"
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a87665089b804f2a1fba1
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--047d7b3a87665089b804f2a1fba1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Distributivity is not a problem in the original question. Distributivity
there (with {ro}) is good.


On 17 February 2014 13:47, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:

>   How about "lo marce cu selca'u [pa'a/tai/lo canlu be] paki'o smacu"?
>
>
The problem with distributivity here is simply fixed with a {lo} before {pa
ki'o}, but then we would be introducing a thousand rats in the discourse,
whereas, in principle, there could be only one.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--047d7b3a87665089b804f2a1fba1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Distributivity is not a problem in the original question. =
Distributivity there (with {ro}) is good.<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br=
><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 17 February 2014 13:47, Michael Turnians=
ky <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mturniansky@gmail.com" target=3D=
"_blank">mturniansky@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">=A0 How about &quot;lo marc=
e cu selca&#39;u [pa&#39;a/tai/lo canlu be] paki&#39;o smacu&quot;?<div><br=
></div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>The problem with distributivity here is simply =
fixed with a {lo} before {pa ki&#39;o}, but then we would be introducing a =
thousand rats in the discourse, whereas, in principle, there could be only =
one.<br>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br>mu&#39;o<br>mi&#39;e .asiz. <br></div>=
</div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />

--047d7b3a87665089b804f2a1fba1--