Received: from mail-oa0-f58.google.com ([209.85.219.58]:57521) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WFXb3-0002R4-SY for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:47 -0800 Received: by mail-oa0-f58.google.com with SMTP id m1sf4401459oag.13 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=deVJH/UW+3B7yQvThCwHPUOW64vGS1+2jvQ98yt+SHY=; b=ESpcQUK3TPrevtKJhJqThqW59t5kGMDmzNmII9i7HMhu8/UHzX6t2ijwPpEXmDLeC4 q1udzkNQqy8/sCxt8UJm9Cz4w5PffxFGu7BekWaCxWaqPqs5M5K5XwrmXIlHoyAVk+gE hNl/YlDH6mt4A0TRXJt2Y1OM1IAkUiYpTSQxn7r4QXciAaAuIwFN9GePXPc0vFV6iMG1 6aAnQOP79ejb/MHllzl3aKlmzPUC2YxP5ae/dVXFObME5cCCCCqenv5H/QgBnCT+Z+WX WnuEWJ4mzfgqlGAnt3tAw3PhcwCTRTREdQwarWGOkBw72NSx1a9rM6XV6T4Z+j0afUAa n+7Q== X-Received: by 10.50.47.74 with SMTP id b10mr101201ign.1.1392679647792; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.122.4 with SMTP id lo4ls1504029igb.11.gmail; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.197.137 with SMTP id iu9mr11472169pbc.3.1392679647503; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10si1064241qcg.3.2014.02.17.15.27.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229; Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i50so5845573qgf.0 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.87.193 with SMTP id x1mr6687572qal.70.1392679647350; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.3.3 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:27:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:27:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "three times as big" From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3e246aa945a04f2a27f32 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c3e246aa945a04f2a27f32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But lo paki'o smacu is no more problematic than a lo pavyseljirna, is it? Isn't that one of the points of xorlo? Non-existence doesn't bother "lo". These are 1000 theoretical mice. --gejyspa On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis < felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote: > Distributivity is not a problem in the original question. Distributivity > there (with {ro}) is good. > > > On 17 February 2014 13:47, Michael Turniansky wrot= e: > >> How about "lo marce cu selca'u [pa'a/tai/lo canlu be] paki'o smacu"? >> >> > The problem with distributivity here is simply fixed with a {lo} before > {pa ki'o}, but then we would be introducing a thousand rats in the > discourse, whereas, in principle, there could be only one. > > mu'o > mi'e .asiz. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c3e246aa945a04f2a27f32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
But lo paki'o smacu is no more problematic than a lo p= avyseljirna, is it? =C2=A0Isn't that one of the points of xorlo? =C2=A0= Non-existence doesn't bother "lo". =C2=A0These are 1000 theor= etical mice.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0--gejyspa


=


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Felipe Gon=C3=A7alves Assis <f= elipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote:
Distributivity is not a pro= blem in the original question. Distributivity there (with {ro}) is good.


On 17 February 2014 13:4= 7, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
=C2=A0 How about "lo m= arce cu selca'u [pa'a/tai/lo canlu be] paki'o smacu"?
=

The problem with distributivity here is s= imply fixed with a {lo} before {pa ki'o}, but then we would be introduc= ing a thousand rats in the discourse, whereas, in principle, there could be= only one.

mu'o
mi'e .= asiz.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--001a11c3e246aa945a04f2a27f32--