Received: from mail-yh0-f58.google.com ([209.85.213.58]:46197) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WKngb-000701-5c for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:39:14 -0800 Received: by mail-yh0-f58.google.com with SMTP id z6sf1295423yhz.3 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Kl43yt+CvpHrl7HMUINvm4Bc+43GO2sCglpIjlT1fHE=; b=i7bZhWlVGiKJP6jhUB+HaZ/BKtCaxCbZA68MHWGOzwhxHKyM933DpRKsjkqSvKm5zo XqT4MwOO6DCbnsopa0Ve805MLiXOvBLdE2eyyoOnKJRHNNMY4ZAHcSQsYwAuyef9CsYy JlplSRuQGFUFeKVD3VmEcSiRllPvG1bXPcTegDfUtcFTLLcHxixW+kIr3vmfzNn61TLB y6rPdmwrkmVXewYMgvZQ8lwzYm0fFyKAzLh5fOiehew3YSG309UKFNWZfzXSVS76Ocni HQaV9U7JzfgdwCvZRqxrW6FtOoAFsoyQGTWbpzu5I9KYpoF4sGQAgTX5a5WT3kDGXBJf lQPA== X-Received: by 10.140.36.71 with SMTP id o65mr56608qgo.10.1393933134532; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.47.227 with SMTP id m90ls2589278qga.38.gmail; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.214.226 with SMTP id od2mr4673474vec.1.1393933134289; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 03:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.187.5 with SMTP id cu5msqab; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 21:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.108.6 with SMTP id i6mr49048qgf.0.1393911258571; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:34:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 21:34:17 -0800 (PST) From: mystyrnile@gmail.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: yet another baroque alphabet for Lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: mystyrnile@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15_11577416.1393911257828" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I don't think that's meant for Lojban, but it still seems cool. I didn't read the whole thing though, since it's 12:34am here. On Monday, March 3, 2014 6:12:06 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote: > > Clearly, I'm not a fan of new alphabets for lojban. What is more, this one > is not even supported by UTF. Still a funny idea, unlike some other ones > earlier presented here. > > http://ccmg.cc.toin.ac.jp/tech/bmed/ft28/univalphen.pdf > [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mystyrnile[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid ------=_Part_15_11577416.1393911257828 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't think that's meant for Lojban, but it still seems cool. I didn't read the whole thing though, since it's 12:34am here. On Monday, March 3, 2014 6:12:06 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote: > > Clearly, I'm not a fan of new alphabets for lojban. What is more, this one > is not even supported by UTF. Still a funny idea, unlike some other ones > earlier presented here. > > http://ccmg.cc.toin.ac.jp/tech/bmed/ft28/univalphen.pdf > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_15_11577416.1393911257828 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I don't think that's meant for Lojban, but it still seems = cool. I didn't read the whole thing though, since it's 12:34am here.
On Monday, March 3, 2014 6:12:06 AM UTC-5, la gleki wrote:
Clearly, I'm not a fan of new= alphabets for lojban. What is more, this one is not even supported by UTF.= Still a funny idea, unlike some other ones earlier presented here.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_15_11577416.1393911257828--