Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 107.14.166.227 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=107.14.166.227;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there a formal chess lexicon for the lojban language?
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 03:38:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3578433.u2ySVx1yp9@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-60-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <552a3255-80fc-4f64-bd76-45284fa19d84@googlegroups.com>
References: <CAO7bV+igcL_JpjnN6LszGGcRrj2JAcHij24WpKhXMzWFHw6n5A@mail.gmail.com> <552a3255-80fc-4f64-bd76-45284fa19d84@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 23:54:05 Alex Richmond wrote: >
    I was thinking about this a couple weeks ago. I like the idea of using >
   gismu as the piece names, although there's still the other terminology to
   > sort out (check, checkmate, castle, en passant, file, rank, resignation,
    > blunder, etc.) [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 23:54:05 Alex Richmond wrote:
> I was thinking about this a couple weeks ago. I like the idea of using
> gismu as the piece names, although there's still the other terminology to
> sort out (check, checkmate, castle, en passant, file, rank, resignation,
> blunder, etc.)

How about "lampagre kavbu" for "capture en passant" and "randa" for "resign"?

Pierre
-- 
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.