Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d;
Message-ID: <534A975C.6070304@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:55:40 +0200
From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Tag compounds' semantics
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

coi ro do,

Is { broda ri'u vi ko'a } equivalent to { broda ri'u zo'e vi ko'a } or 
to { broda ri'u ko'a vi ko'a }?
In other words, is {ri'u vi} --and {pu zi} and the similar tag compounds 
for that matter-- considered semantically as a single tag (whose argument 
is shared by the two tag members), or as two standalone tags?

Thanks in advance,
mi'e la .ilmen. mu'o


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.