Received: from mail-vc0-f187.google.com ([209.85.220.187]:41353) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WZNud-0000dr-O2 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:10:04 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f187.google.com with SMTP id id10sf1592975vcb.4 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EMzKxG/Mx5SIfN0ji32WuXSgFGuX8EfPMOTwB7Sicu4=; b=ULNYIZgiqzIVbUl+rt15vQlRJAabKtaxekGcGjugnaBDlOAVgY43my3zE2AVoF/0yr XHdIXlALT2q14CKKbRFZZ6c2Yq5uC2uy1mr7rdWPZJIsPZK7xSbW71x/RCae8QX9n298 BTKtoS3vR1J38tdi+QDUAzKPsTqtoz+XkJtPD+eNfZpxsQqSweByXuf1DuBbHNwbmwFE IrwMzO2YXRVfdsqzQO1++3/Q0T0ilFar2VaIgvYXzm2epy/Ow1Yj+xyB21XV/X0T9mzq cc1RgTGnI7J9u7DjVlk93TpvDVluIDpSpwjtEo+id7yMqG41M+jcctLhGdeowFDLXomN 44Zg== X-Received: by 10.50.79.169 with SMTP id k9mr266260igx.12.1397408981273; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.112.226 with SMTP id it2ls1264374igb.38.gmail; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.2.65 with SMTP id 1mr5145017igs.1.1397408980773; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fj1si3351347vdc.3.2014.04.13.10.09.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235; Received: by mail-ve0-x235.google.com with SMTP id oy12so6415807veb.26 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.201.5 with SMTP id jw5mr30990939vec.6.1397408980522; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <534AC00A.6040801@gmail.com> References: <534A975C.6070304@gmail.com> <2198754.cf9Q7LNGSG@caracal> <534AC00A.6040801@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:09:40 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Tag compounds' semantics From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6aea2e3f03b04f6efa1bc X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7bd6aea2e3f03b04f6efa1bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Ilmen wrote: > > In Jbovlaste and the ma'oste, {vi} is described as follow: > * << location tense distance: here at ... ; at or a very short/tiny > distance from ... >> > That's somewhat contradictory, which can ve seen more clearly with "va" or "vu": "near to ... ; there at ...; a medium/small distance from ..." "far from ... ; yonder at ... ; a long distance from ..." "Here/there/yonder at ..." is obviously not the same as "a short/medium/long distance from ..." In any case CLL dropped the "here/there/yonder at ..." version, and the BPFK has the magnitude version: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Distance As I understand it, {vi} is a tag based on {sepli}; its argument is a > sepli2, and not a sepli3. > Otherwise, {vi lo cmalu} would be somewhat redundant, don't you think so? > :) > "vi lo cmalu" is somewhat redundant, but "vi lo centre be li ci" is not. :) mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bd6aea2e3f03b04f6efa1bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bd6aea2e3f03b04f6efa1bc--