Received: from mail-wi0-f190.google.com ([209.85.212.190]:55395) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WZO62-0000hl-G1 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:41 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f190.google.com with SMTP id n15sf198218wiw.17 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Hr5+wSoIHzBoTH7EWgJHTZcr4XLb2JvtZoWe7jPEcWo=; b=Y3SE5skyMHw8maBDxi+J0QV+mjaIA2Z6hUt/gFL1ar17VmpEEawgXhx47D8mp2RVUQ tOWoVim3LNiQlCsk/cPUFQD1yu0KDHDlVVBeoI7UyF2LHCfTouo1QRvScvtskZB9Dcf1 7dWAy1jRycNltu9IQDfFDwZt0g5tNjcngmFMn+j0elzFNGkIJcQzVG5fJQFsCabBNNj7 VvXVcLvj8II7DSfBKHJMV/K8/9TjsMlXP8wNQ0lHQgf2Pj9/xDNFgcecqee4mYqU0VhA L9xUDJxKQhNIEib87c1fzUT/gWWuTwZ76jlSDBncSFYEdCKG+KeiehHVJ6U6MUr4CZV4 ZX3w== X-Received: by 10.180.97.195 with SMTP id ec3mr35227wib.6.1397409687010; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.92.98 with SMTP id cl2ls366370wib.53.canary; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.15.53.136 with SMTP id r8mr85eew.5.1397409686288; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fp6si430347wib.2.2014.04.13.10.21.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::229; Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hm4so4472435wib.0 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.96.66 with SMTP id dq2mr6354998wib.54.1397409686190; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([37.252.202.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gc19sm17954969wic.5.2014.04.13.10.21.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <534AC78C.9090101@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:21:16 +0200 From: Ilmen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Tag compounds' semantics References: <534A975C.6070304@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090803060007030207040202" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090803060007030207040202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/04/2014 18:43, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ilmen > wrote: > > coi ro do, > > Is { broda ri'u vi ko'a } equivalent to { broda ri'u zo'e vi ko'a > } or to { broda ri'u ko'a vi ko'a }? > > CLL doesn't say it directly, but for the example you give it would=20 > probably go with the latter, since for CLL the sumti complement of VA=20 > is the origin of the "imaginary journey", just as for FAhA, and "FAhA=20 > VA" combine to describe the same leg of the imaginary journey, so=20 > naturally they have the same origin. coi la .xorxes. Yeah, I thought that such tag coupounds could be expended as follow: {broda pu zu ko'a} =3D {lo nu broda ku ko'a purci gi'e te temci lo barda} {broda ri'u vi ko'a} =3D {lo nu broda ku ko'a pritu gi'e sepli lo cmalu} pei > But for compound tenses that involve two or more FAhA, that is not the=20 > case. Each FAhA describes a new leg of the journey, which starts where=20 > the previous one left off, so they can't all share the same sumti=20 > complement as origin when separated. But the sumti complement of the=20 > compound will be the origin for the first leg of the journey, which=20 > corresponds to the first FAhA of the series, not the last one, So=20 > "ri'u ga'u ko'a" will break down as "ri'u ko'a ga'u zo'e", not as=20 > "ri'u zo'e ga'u ko'a". {ri'u ga'u ko'a} =3D {ri'u ko'a ga'u zo'e}? This is... weird. o_O --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --------------090803060007030207040202 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 13/04/2014 18:43, Jorge Llambías wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com> wrote:
coi ro do,

Is { broda ri'u vi ko'a } equivalent to { broda ri'u zo'e vi ko'a } or to { broda ri'u ko'a vi ko'a }?
 
CLL doesn't say it directly, but for the example you give it would probably go with the latter, since for CLL the sumti complement of VA is the origin of the "imaginary journey", just as for FAhA, and "FAhA VA" combine to describe the same leg of the imaginary journey, so naturally they have the same origin.

coi la .xorxes.

Yeah, I thought that such tag coupounds could be expended as follow:

{broda pu zu ko'a} = {lo nu broda ku ko'a purci gi'e te temci lo barda}
{broda ri'u vi ko'a} = {lo nu broda ku ko'a pritu gi'e sepli lo cmalu}

pei

But for compound tenses that involve two or more FAhA, that is not the case. Each FAhA describes a new leg of the journey, which starts where the previous one left off, so they can't all share the same sumti complement as origin when separated. But the sumti complement of the compound will be the origin for the first leg of the journey, which corresponds to the first FAhA of the series, not the last one,  So "ri'u ga'u ko'a" will break down as "ri'u ko'a ga'u zo'e", not as "ri'u zo'e ga'u ko'a".

{ri'u ga'u ko'a} = {ri'u ko'a ga'u zo'e}?  This is... weird. o_O

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--------------090803060007030207040202--