Received: from mail-yk0-f186.google.com ([209.85.160.186]:57372) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WZTwK-0003Rl-MB for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:36:11 -0700 Received: by mail-yk0-f186.google.com with SMTP id 200sf557171ykr.13 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kyYmbVRhvuD7o1hH9kMIHuFqEJ3IdvtGUKsi9VXjHYk=; b=brJu1C9wCl0GJDTGcbExH0HA5eatuNWlE/4fD1FriX/G+kbA+/WdVTD9cxq9oYxY0K TWYXTPXBppbpTBowBpHV8hc914LNt5HVmsgtuJ/9VlYyMOJg69horPN0pfI9KfuSN80O rTXgfrc29Iaqt333EBFIFvvxcqv6jHLwFGaZt9tk3yBC/q0IZVQF4GTIGSsZO6qMRJzI fOZx23vvPm10gJxxmRNGC+Tykb1e8sYmJ/hc9iwGSRHIpIklBk0uOZhFYX941JDKDYQd W36gJRUE4NoEFziYS1D4+x/ukwuO8/iTmQnkcUux1CiipZYegkC7bbi9CMC8TMy3+DA7 TJyA== X-Received: by 10.140.48.7 with SMTP id n7mr6850qga.6.1397432150392; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.84.103 with SMTP id k94ls468386qgd.30.gmail; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.127.66 with SMTP id ne2mr17247874veb.27.1397432150126; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fj1si3582445vdc.3.2014.04.13.16.35.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f; Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id lh14so6596783vcb.6 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.229.97 with SMTP id sp1mr15724111vdc.23.1397432150035; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:35:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 20:35:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban semantics From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01177477e6977c04f6f506f9 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e01177477e6977c04f6f506f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, shanoxilt < osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com> wrote: > > For those of you who can not access the link, here is the discussion: > >> Lojban is not a logic in the sense that logicians use the word. It has >> the syntax but not the semantics. A logic needs both. See the Semantics >> section of the wiki page of first-order logic for a brief overview on what >> first-order semantics look like. I have not seen any Lojban documents that >> would have defined the structure that's used for interpreting the words of >> the language, a class of structures that would provide acceptable >> interpretations, or even a rule for constructing such classes of >> structures. >> > Lojban is a language, not a logic, but first-order logic is very easy (almost trivial) to express in Lojban. The only difference is that Lojban uses words instead of the usual letters and symbols, but that's a very superficial difference. Could you provide an example of one word that has semantics defined for it >> in the logical sense? Every word that I've seen has been defined in terms >> of translations to other languages with possibly a sentence or two >> explaining which of the different meanings of the word is intended. Those >> are not first-order definitions of things. > > > So, how do the semantics of Lojban work? > You can make it work exactly as in first-order logic if you want. But I'm probably not understanding what the issue is. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e01177477e6977c04f6f506f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, shanoxilt <osiris_ha= des_deathland@hotmail.com> wrote:

For those of you who can not access the link, he= re is the discussion:

Lojban is not a logic in the sense that logicians use the word. It has the = syntax but not the semantics. A logic needs both. See the Semantics section= of the wiki page of first-order logic for a brief overview on what first-o= rder semantics look like. I have not seen any Lojban documents that would h= ave defined the structure that's used for interpreting the words of the= language, a class of structures that would provide acceptable interpretati= ons, or even a rule for constructing such classes of structures.=A0

Lojban is a language, n= ot a logic, but first-order logic is very easy (almost trivial) to express = in Lojban. The only difference is that Lojban uses words instead of the usu= al letters and symbols,=A0but that's a very superficial difference.

=A0Could you provide an example of one word that has semantics defined for = it in the logical sense? Every word that I've seen has been defined in = terms of translations to other languages with possibly a sentence or two ex= plaining which of the different meanings of the word is intended. Those are= not first-order definitions of things.

So, how do the semantics of Lojban work?=A0
=

You can make it work exactly as in first-o= rder logic if you want. But I'm probably not understanding what the iss= ue is.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e01177477e6977c04f6f506f9--