Received: from mail-pd0-f185.google.com ([209.85.192.185]:44179) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WZUhe-0003fC-7A for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:59 -0700 Received: by mail-pd0-f185.google.com with SMTP id y13sf1629016pdi.22 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=C/cpdeztU1HDB4vBKSH75Cp5dsdU3qd6ebBFxB1Be8s=; b=UoyV8YfUmCgHqwDoRJigW/htCCWOz5cajnXhLMilkgWDLTu3ZoS6O+/5HDUjzcrbZN U66GKY3K0bGsU+jg4gAvGFebO8xAlS4jhlUejf7tKEA38kwBUaRA08SRJkJbbCPZkqqx ySUnfln+LYvLn+MZjo1xKeiJU5YqvPv1lLoXc+GmWCsQJn+OPurckGZt7FB5Fn/zg8NE QYJH/ahSUOVLKRc3PLBqj8Y9HfzaDexSY2xkH/spHtD6AlPyU2L9aigQzcdkKQnQ8j2s EPEPTuRMjBU2l75eKjSLWue2HEY+3bPuiI+8+birR1j97citu7PFi5Pa9JKtL9HQFCod Iwxg== X-Received: by 10.182.97.195 with SMTP id ec3mr229obb.30.1397435083908; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.66.104 with SMTP id e8ls967551obt.44.gmail; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.28.36 with SMTP id y4mr18867304obg.46.1397435083363; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8si3607555vdv.2.2014.04.13.17.24.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229; Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ik5so7064725vcb.28 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.253.75 with SMTP id zy11mr16673249vdc.10.1397435083253; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:24:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:24:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban semantics From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135ef16bbed3704f6f5b524 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a1135ef16bbed3704f6f5b524 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, shanoxilt < osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> You can make it work exactly as in first-order logic if you want. But I'm >> probably not understanding what the issue is. >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> >> > They throw a fit every time Lojban is mentioned for some reason. He thinks > it can't be a logical language unless the gismu are defined with formal > semantics. > > There's nothing to stop him from doing that. With the usual formalism predicates are just arbitrary letters, so you can assign the corresponding functions to them more or less at random, whereas in Lojban the predicates are words that will want to keep some consistency across interpretations, but you can provide any given interpretation in exactly the same way you would do it with the usual language of letters and symbols. If you wanted to, you could use "broda xi pa", "broda xi re", and so forth instead and forget the standard meanings of brivla. Also you have some considerations such that if the speaker is a member of D, then you will want to assign it to the constant "mi", not to the constant "do", and so forth, but that seems to be beside the point. You are not forced to use those "predetermined" constants if you don't want, you can just use "ko'a xi pa", "ko'a xi re" and so on. An interpretation is basically just an assignment of a member of the universe of discourse D to each constant and of a function from D^n into {true, false} to each predicate. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1135ef16bbed3704f6f5b524 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, shanoxilt <osiri= s_hades_deathland@hotmail.com> wrote:

You ca= n make it work exactly as in first-order logic if you want. But I'm pro= bably not understanding what the issue is.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


They throw a fit every time = Lojban is mentioned for some reason. He thinks it can't be a logical la= nguage unless the gismu are defined with=A0formal semantics.
There's nothing to stop him from = doing that. With the usual formalism predicates are just arbitrary letters,= so you can assign the corresponding functions to them more or less at rand= om, whereas in Lojban the predicates are words that will want to keep some = consistency across interpretations, but you can provide any given interpret= ation in exactly the same way you would do it with the usual language of le= tters and symbols. If you wanted to, you could use "broda xi pa",= "broda xi re", and so forth instead =A0and forget the standard m= eanings of brivla.=A0Also you have some considerations such that if the spe= aker is a member of D, then you will want to assign it to the constant &quo= t;mi", not to the constant "do", and so forth, but that seem= s to be beside the point. You are not forced to use those "predetermin= ed" constants if you don't want, you can just use "ko'a x= i pa", "ko'a xi re" and so on. An interpretation is basi= cally just an assignment of a member of the universe of discourse D to each= constant and of a function from D^n into {true, false} to each predicate.<= /div>

mu'o mi= 'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1135ef16bbed3704f6f5b524--