Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.214;
Message-ID: <534F06A0.20603@lojban.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:39:28 -0400
From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Imperative mi'o?
References: <qhAm1n00f56Cr6M01hAnAN>
In-Reply-To: <qhAm1n00f56Cr6M01hAnAN>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On 4/16/2014 12:37 PM, kosmikconundrum@gmail.com wrote:
> Say you were at a dinner with some Lojbanic friends.  You and your
> significant other must leave early for whatever reason.  You want to
> look at him/her and say "mi'o klama" so that all listening know that you
> mean just yourself and your partner.  But at the same time, you want it
> to come across as an imperative "ko klama".
> How would you handle this?  mi'oko?

ko goi mi'o,
or ideally
doi mi'o [do'u] ko klama
since ko is supposed to be formally defined as the referent of any 
operative doi clause.

lojbab

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.