Received: from mail-pa0-f58.google.com ([209.85.220.58]:61779) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Waqpz-0001nN-Jd for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:15:13 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f58.google.com with SMTP id fa1sf170222pad.13 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CsjQhKPZ0HZXgjbIF+uWMwl/wn1HmLZUdIVTNEx6xs8=; b=RZahe4AwD6VkHW/LsObgDdzMcCNCiNMRjsISVi326l9yvketqa8IEEOadsEVzIKgmB cZG3Mij9KO0EfLRxoafgELKVnp/jKPOAbO7Iz5W1abLRAbwrkhlulAzSvKi3GyX04Nf+ iymCaEZewSpDxB45Tnw6ppnyCGGsCazRsARzj8Yhn0P6Ap7GdfR9GQ+PrJK5BtDjTiX2 +nseLbEOOWAubWSJdJlMfeb5+c1YlJVwdHZDbT1/WE0J5vSn1f9fWFy2odLGp12WMG/m XhMnUjIc4dxRVm2UpdpPpS5mf6v2i27Xk51lGwb52IwhbCzVbdFbO3oPvwx2uGtCuKPD iaHw== X-Received: by 10.50.25.4 with SMTP id y4mr392412igf.10.1397758497378; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:14:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.50.174 with SMTP id d14ls100791igo.13.gmail; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.62.106 with SMTP id x10mr8550247igr.2.1397758496871; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omr-d03.mx.aol.com (omr-d03.mx.aol.com. [205.188.109.200]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7si437584qcz.2.2014.04.17.11.14.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of almikes@aol.com designates 205.188.109.200 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.188.109.200; Received: from mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.78]) by omr-d03.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id B1D7870228373 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:14:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p549FBF99.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.159.191.153]) by mtaout-mca02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 90A6738000098 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:14:31 +0200 From: Wuzzy To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] What are the most important fu'ivla and cimjvo? Message-ID: <20140417201431.3d53baf0@aol.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add4e53501a1a2d01 X-AOL-IP: 84.159.191.153 X-Original-Sender: almikes@aol.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of almikes@aol.com designates 205.188.109.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=almikes@aol.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Am Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:55:30 +0400 schrieb Gleki Arxokuna : > We know that gimste represents more or less most basic concepts. > But what about fu'ivla and cimjvo? > Although, we have a frequency dictionary what are in your opinion the > most important of them? I thing those so-called =E2=80=9Ccimjvo=E2=80=9D (what a silly word! An .u'= ivla, really! xD) are super rare in Lojban. I can=E2=80=99t you give any new exam= ples and I don=E2=80=99t think they play a large role in Lojban. Metaphors are a= n exception in lujvo already. Dropping the pe'a as well is an exception to an exception. So it=E2=80=99s no wonder I can=E2=80=99t name you such wo= rds. And that=E2=80=99s good. In Lojban, everything is to be taken literally exc= ept when otherwise stated. This is a very good idea in my eyes and I don=E2=80= =99t see why this principle should be broken. Instead of translating such strange words, I think it may be more appropriate to create a new word instead, one which does not need a metaphor in the first place. At the very least, a new word where the metaphor is explicit (with =E2=80=9Cpe'a=E2=80=9D) can always be created fr= om the old word. I just did that with =E2=80=9Ccimjvo=E2=80=9D by creating =E2=80=9Cpevycimj= vo=E2=80=9D. The definition of =E2=80=9Ccimjvo=E2=80=9D is actually useful, it=E2=80=99s just the word = that=E2=80=99s silly (to me). BTW: I don=E2=80=99t count =E2=80=9Cfu'ivla=E2=80=9D as a an implicit metap= hor lujvo. A loan word is really just a =E2=80=9Ccopy word=E2=80=9D. You copy the word from o= ne language to another. Okay, maybe not EXACTLY copy it, but you get the idea. The relations of rafsi in lujvo do not have to be 100% accurate. but that does not make them to metaphors already. I am unsure about =E2=80=9Czi'evla=E2=80=9D, however. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.