Received: from mail-fa0-f59.google.com ([209.85.161.59]:48660)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBO6UZKNAKGQESACLO2I@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1WbYX5-0006df-O9
	for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:54:36 -0700
Received: by mail-fa0-f59.google.com with SMTP id m10sf229578fae.14
        for <lojban-list-archive@lojban.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=uAi0wdhSwSh+ZpzhDffVHcq5GPio/wRYv++j9XunLdk=;
        b=O7iY1q/X62SjkTRc6SC9uZeG/ihgo+F4/CChrzWRri4xuzlfHhlTL7Ak/JfIA6GXfF
         zPy0A4bDg/pnvfGsUl3DRE/7OoLtc72KGm03N2oc/V1C6sdxUNSSn4Yo22MVoL49JKfx
         8Ter+lZnjE6dv+6S9PtLhKeVYbLy6dBfR6cLZ2cHWvX141Ddf/xkQdWrG+BwV2QUIcpf
         +gn8VDJ1UcMu/oqYi3M3C1oLRl0vWmEdX/Gdye31/R0agDSRN7f/tnh7+pxzlgPOiJ0z
         JPK+/iLhpSYd9oRZnhdXnEOXAdLdzOi+YgO6j8NepcYIIOkbgUQf094dVxszjOojRMnj
         IEqg==
X-Received: by 10.180.109.161 with SMTP id ht1mr46011wib.6.1397926460411;
        Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.98.39 with SMTP id ef7ls197977wib.46.canary; Sat, 19 Apr
 2014 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.78.101 with SMTP id a5mr642278wix.7.1397926459620;
        Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dd12116.kasserver.com (dd12116.kasserver.com. [85.13.134.113])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u49si1845839eeo.1.2014.04.19.09.54.19
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 85.13.134.113 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of me@v4hn.de) client-ip=85.13.134.113;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dbc2788.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.39.136])
	by dd12116.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA89824C45BC
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:54:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:54:18 +0200
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] ti'enai
Message-ID: <20140419165418.GA9151@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <CAO7bV+ivr_XOBhDva8Q2sKj=tknVa_-6WUhKWRwBnESj=0B5ow@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+ivr_XOBhDva8Q2sKj=tknVa_-6WUhKWRwBnESj=0B5ow@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 85.13.134.113 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of me@v4hn.de) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /


--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 05:53:17PM +0400, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
> can {ti'enai} be defined? What would be the difference from {ba'anai}?

What would be the similarity?

The scale of {ba'a} always refers to an experience.
Either in the expected future, the present or the past.

{ti'e} on the other hand tags an utterance as hearsay, possibly
with a focus on the uncertain truth value of the statement.
{ti'enai} then implies "grounded" knowledge pe'i.
So (pe'i) it would be reasonable to say {ti'enai li pa li pa te sumji li re},
whereas the same sentence tagged with {ba'anai} sounds weird.


v4hn

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Yd6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--