Received: from mail-pa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.220.56]:39346) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WbZNX-000755-UB for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:50 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f56.google.com with SMTP id kl14sf699825pab.11 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Pyv1J3yE2ad/U9oouwRTcC08MrHHiGhScg6CRCTXA5s=; b=tEDHq69TCzN09IHWeaQQllxSPIuJqg7u9FIgaiW93xJ1X3IVm6nXOLCPzEBHaVCBSE IzADRkT2rb4VByjM6tgLGxjrK9qlpm+FBQCClcZZfxkeGQkFQfGx934O4kCkABNTBwYk ZPHDJGGE44fmXHBRKg509Uwcy6xHZzS32fSHolyvDGKVIuZtoZPwoKakMi1y6MJe0gxy KguNRRlgaEjBU0gU22gI0dXQ7uxIxag4OMXugjtwJ+mz+5juBsMO13xYfEMKmrVOfGRS 2CHbP/POGhZO/atTgB4Qw3nJWWDt+5Kdk6WH27/OJ3UQzev1LrtbJ4+9JCRL0ACObdx/ 8t8g== X-Received: by 10.50.73.98 with SMTP id k2mr262237igv.0.1397929713941; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.119.100 with SMTP id kt4ls780606igb.5.gmail; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.145.105 with SMTP id st9mr15470247pab.23.1397929713682; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x235.google.com (mail-ve0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id on5si7551028vdb.0.2014.04.19.10.48.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235; Received: by mail-ve0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oy12so5179193veb.12 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.171.229 with SMTP id ax5mr21217554vec.24.1397929713522; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140419165418.GA9151@samsa.fritz.box> References: <20140419165418.GA9151@samsa.fritz.box> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:48:33 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] ti'enai From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b675e66fee0a804f768df5a X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, v4hn wrote: > > The scale of {ba'a} always refers to an experience. > Either in the expected future, the present or the past. > The future/present/past of the ba'a scale is the time when the sppeaker gets the evidence for what they're saying, not the time when whatever it is they are talking about happens. http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Evidentials [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [209.85.220.56 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid --047d7b675e66fee0a804f768df5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, v4hn wrote: > > The scale of {ba'a} always refers to an experience. > Either in the expected future, the present or the past. > The future/present/past of the ba'a scale is the time when the sppeaker gets the evidence for what they're saying, not the time when whatever it is they are talking about happens. http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Evidentials So it is possible to use "ba'a" to describe past events in which the speaker did not participate (as in "I expect you had a good time at the party yeaterday", I don't have confirmation yet, but I expect you will be confirming it) or "ba'a nai" to talk about something that will happen in the future ("I remember he will be leaving soon"). "ba'a cu'i" can also be used to indicate that the speaker is realizing something as they speak, not only to indicate that they are currently experiencing what they are describing. > {ti'e} on the other hand tags an utterance as hearsay, possibly > with a focus on the uncertain truth value of the statement. > {ti'enai} then implies "grounded" knowledge pe'i. > So (pe'i) it would be reasonable to say {ti'enai li pa li pa te sumji li > re}, > whereas the same sentence tagged with {ba'anai} sounds weird. Perhaps that case is too simple to tag with "ba'a nai" because presumably the speaker knows how to add one plus one and doesn't need to rely on memory to know it's two, but then someone may say "ba'a nai li no sinso li pai" because they remember it from having studied it even though they have no other evidence that that is the case. "ti'e nai" would mean "first hand knowledge" and "ba'a cu'i" "knowledge that I'm getting right now", so sometimes they may both apply and sometimes only one of them, or neither. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b675e66fee0a804f768df5a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:

The scale of {ba'a} always refers to an experience.
Either in the expected future, the present or the past.

The future/present/past of the ba'a scale is the time = when the sppeaker gets the evidence for what they're saying, not the ti= me when whatever it is they are talking about happens. =C2=A0http://www.lojban.org/= tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Evidentials

So it is possible to use "ba'a" to descri= be past events in which the speaker did not participate (as in "I expe= ct you had a good time at the party yeaterday", I don't have confi= rmation yet, but I expect you will be confirming it) or "ba'a nai&= quot; to talk about something that will happen in the future ("I remem= ber he will be leaving soon"). "ba'a cu'i" can also = be used to indicate that the speaker is realizing something as they speak, = not only to indicate that they are currently experiencing what they are des= cribing.=C2=A0


{ti'e} on the other hand tags an utterance as hearsay, possibly
with a focus on the uncertain truth value of the statement.
{ti'enai} then implies "grounded" knowledge pe'i.
So (pe'i) it would be reasonable to say {ti'enai li pa li pa te sum= ji li re},
whereas the same sentence tagged with {ba'anai} sounds weird.

Perhaps that case is too simple to tag with "ba= 'a nai" because presumably the speaker knows how to add one plus o= ne and doesn't need to rely on memory to know it's two, but then so= meone may say "ba'a nai li no sinso li pai" because they reme= mber it from having studied it even though they have no other evidence that= that is the case.

"ti'e nai" would mean "first hand kn= owledge" and "ba'a cu'i" "knowledge that I'= m getting right now", so sometimes they may both apply and sometimes o= nly one of them, or neither.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b675e66fee0a804f768df5a--