Received: from mail-wg0-f56.google.com ([74.125.82.56]:53443) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WdMmk-0007LF-U6 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:46:12 -0700 Received: by mail-wg0-f56.google.com with SMTP id m15sf212168wgh.1 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=IgvrDAdnX2LAWmXzJiKLaJA3vTzBrgBLyUeyjwXwoBg=; b=KNF/7SG5OZyvJftwhN7ZzN2z3xwg6ICq+TUd4jE8NwATD2oyUaaJ93ZpolHBLtbzi+ a0kM6Wtu6VD3guwh7mUKDIpA8UTwZniTRvhKODxW0an6/lJx7NQf064Uoc1L9kIpYysw 5lescTk7r89SMt1tPGZh93a7hZupuPTLaCD+jeeciamFMYzEzJ3IGUIl2/2n2DQ6O42n +ocP23H21NOsKEVDzXRWOlMkLJrLcrEN4Qn07aNkd4eHmXQ8uWz6eljfU9UQMfliQVMA R4tzRxsqiWqkS2hzf3NxA5AqnnAtsD+Zp6cxcxbF1tTHQSpK2Hit49aLgERZmHNxMPA3 y29w== X-Received: by 10.180.218.195 with SMTP id pi3mr23879wic.13.1398357959548; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.84.66 with SMTP id w2ls150017wiy.26.gmail; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.10.129 with SMTP id i1mr560780wib.5.1398357958589; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u3si2942wiw.3.2014.04.24.09.45.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a; Received: by mail-wi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1498925wib.5 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.99.161 with SMTP id er1mr7412830wib.3.1398357958133; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.25.163 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85b3adb5-9bb1-4412-a14e-50755151b785@googlegroups.com> References: <2368f1c8-1a70-4dfc-b657-a17ec590ba02@googlegroups.com> <85b3adb5-9bb1-4412-a14e-50755151b785@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:45:58 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Imperative mi'o? From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426db06006d404f7cc95a2 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d04426db06006d404f7cc95a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-04-24 19:42 GMT+04:00 .neit. : > So I gather the following summary in answer (in no particular order): > > 1) Specify to whom {ko} refers in the same way you would specify to whom > {do} refers - using {doi} and it's vocative family > 2) Logically connect the sumti {mi .e ko klama} > I dont think 2) is correct at all. It states that I go, no command towards me is present. > 3) Use the experimental {ko'oi} such that {zo ko du lu do ko'oi li'u} > 4) Assign {ko} as though it were an assignable sumka'i using {goi} > > mi ckire fo lo rodo sidju > > I tend to prefer #1. I don't recall reading that {ko} works as an > assignable sumka'i, so I hesitate to use 4). I'm still learning the > language, and I'm teaching my wife and 4 and 7 year-old sons, so as a > personal preference I'm avoiding the use of experimental valsi until we > all have a better command of the language, so 3)'s out. Logical connection > looks like a good solution and adds the flexability of connectives to > imperatives {ko .u mi nitcu klama caku} (heh. ma xe fanva zoi .gy. save > yourself! .gy. la lojban). Similarly, assigning {ko} like you would {do} > seems similarly flexible. > > I'll go with 1) and 2), and perhaps expand to 3) later. > > Thanks again for your answers! > > mi'e .neit. mu'o > > On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:37:48 PM UTC-4, .neit. wrote: > >> Say you were at a dinner with some Lojbanic friends. You and your >> significant other must leave early for whatever reason. You want to look >> at him/her and say "mi'o klama" so that all listening know that you mean >> just yourself and your partner. But at the same time, you want it to come >> across as an imperative "ko klama". >> >> How would you handle this? mi'oko? Can you make personal sumka'i other >> than "do" imperative? (eg: do'oko, ma'ako etc?) >> >> Or would you just decide that it's foolish to take the imperative with >> your significant other and instead say ".e'o mi'o klama"? >> >> .i'o ki'e rodo >> >> mu'o mi'e neit >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d04426db06006d404f7cc95a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



2014-04-24 19:42 GMT+04:00 .neit. <kosmikconundrum@gmail.c= om>:
So I gather the follow= ing summary in answer (in no particular order):
=C2=A0
1)=C2=A0 Specify to whom {ko} refers in the same way you would specify= to whom {do} refers - using {doi} and it's vocative family
2)=C2=A0 Logically connect the sumti {mi .e ko klama}

I dont think 2) is correct at all. It states th= at I go, no command towards me is present.
=C2=A0
3)=C2=A0 Use the experimental {ko'oi} such that {zo ko=C2=A0du lu = do ko'oi li'u}
4)=C2=A0 Assign {ko} as though it were an assignable sumka'i using= {goi}
=C2=A0
mi ckire fo lo rodo sidju
=C2=A0
I tend to prefer #1.=C2=A0 I don't recall reading that {ko} works = as an assignable sumka'i, so I hesitate to use 4).=C2=A0 I'm still = learning the language, and I'm teaching my wife and 4 and 7 year-old so= ns, so as a personal preference I'm avoiding the use of experimental va= lsi until=C2=A0we all=C2=A0have a better command of the language, so 3)'= ;s out.=C2=A0 Logical connection looks like a good solution and adds the fl= exability of connectives to imperatives {ko .u mi nitcu klama caku} (heh.= =C2=A0 ma xe fanva zoi .gy. save yourself! .gy. la lojban).=C2=A0 Similarly= , assigning {ko} like you would {do} seems similarly flexible.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
I'll go with 1) and 2), and perhaps expand to 3) later.
=C2=A0
Thanks again for your answers!
=C2=A0
mi'e .neit. mu'o

On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:37:48 PM UTC-4, .neit. wrote:
Say you were at a dinner with some Lojbanic friends.=C2=A0 You and you= r significant other must leave early for whatever reason.=C2=A0 You want to= look at him/her and say "mi'o klama" so that all listening k= now that you mean just yourself and your partner.=C2=A0 But at the same tim= e, you want it to come across as an imperative "ko klama".
=C2=A0
How would you handle this?=C2=A0 mi'oko?=C2=A0 Can you make person= al sumka'i other than "do" imperative?=C2=A0 (eg: do'oko,= ma'ako etc?)
=C2=A0
Or would you just decide that=C2=A0it's foolish to take the impera= tive with your significant other and instead say ".e'o mi'o kl= ama"?
=C2=A0
.i'o ki'e rodo
=C2=A0
mu'o mi'e neit

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d04426db06006d404f7cc95a2--