Received: from mail-ee0-f63.google.com ([74.125.83.63]:45812) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wfa0D-0006n6-Nq for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:19 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f63.google.com with SMTP id d17sf215928eek.18 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=iNenRH9YYQn6gDShdUxeIeNlXvR8CwYpqr4DI6H18l0=; b=CrlOoXBkJCQN8DESlFyMCipBYAWwEQ5sl1WdhD3YJgEXbOR/dDYmbBWcim77Xcru5k Z0McLYAFFk3bI1XqCUP15gBrv2+00x1SWWa9L0X/GWhFK19TRT7mnkPE9XmfdWGK/33m 0QcL6QcSoxzcCu8hEyjZvryY1lCgsqtPLTKwMsXBQLy4jV6w1jN85N2AhWm9vVQNosTu Zog44mVleEu5BIPKrUCaj4R1MkRfdRLn23LBb72ystC3D1+TJwsQaVIPABRWwPhr/g3m hpg1XsKKdOrDBMVXtjyJwV7E64DrtDfS4jYQoXpvb5T3Hhg6a6nR3cjt7XtMnzqkB0gr BASw== X-Received: by 10.152.28.4 with SMTP id x4mr35517lag.28.1398885422140; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.4.131 with SMTP id k3ls106590lak.87.gmail; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.164.74 with SMTP id yo10mr615503lbb.11.1398885421613; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fq10si170615wib.3.2014.04.30.12.17.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c; Received: by mail-wi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id hi2so9709966wib.5 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.60.114 with SMTP id g18mr3862088wjr.61.1398885421499; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.25.163 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:17:01 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] Fwd: [Loglanists] Operator Precedence Grammar From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66f33da14afc04f84764e2 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b66f33da14afc04f84764e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Has anybody ever tried to analyse Loglan (or Lojban for that matter) as an operator precedence grammar of some sort? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Hill Date: 2014-04-30 22:14 GMT+04:00 Subject: [Loglanists] Operator Precedence Grammar To: Loglan List Has anybody ever tried to analyse Loglan (or Lojban for that matter) as an operator precedence grammar of some sort? Peter Hill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b66f33da14afc04f84764e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Has anybody ever tried to analyse Loglan (or Lojban for that matter) as an
operator precedence grammar of some sort?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Hill <corwin@westnet.com.au>
Date: 2014-04-30 22:14 GMT+04:00
Subject: [Loglanists] Operator Precedence Grammar
To: Loglan List <loglanists@mailman.ucsd.edu>


Has anybody ever tried to analyse Loglan (or Lojban for that matter) as an
operator precedence grammar of some sort?

Peter Hill.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b66f33da14afc04f84764e2--