Received: from mail-ve0-f190.google.com ([209.85.128.190]:33085) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WkzGT-0005Ui-KD for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:35 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f190.google.com with SMTP id jz11sf402425veb.27 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=l+Z9wIdPi3Htq/iarJ8aFj8ouCPv54KLk97pxLbLZHc=; b=LoOs11lUrD1Xb7Isih2L3f51YF/RjRROGe6/pHDRl+nzVmfxP/kNks8MujffUxwuIf 0JhxHodBj8eJhCFjgkBpp7I/WEfaylzzTtT+/nRRpgOt1z0kFeOO45yWmLY3OOvd2OaZ fSAh6YhcoUJlAveMQyyXT0ug30OgYjKZUzjOQx//N2MsB9uk3A6wAU5mMNjnb/TwLr2m kDo8fZ5ZfFLMAarjKEIkZkh86O5coxZQFRvZeEWsBbToKTTbFbuxuTXmUNqQbxWKbwPL de7kLEU/xlD3nxSKG8L1J3Iv3QciEZOn3Me52Vq9miWk7EohGqV549Z5xVTBQfG1V/KX S5Eg== X-Received: by 10.50.49.104 with SMTP id t8mr345864ign.9.1400174171152; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:11 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.73.229 with SMTP id o5ls4183548igv.21.canary; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.137.105 with SMTP id qh9mr5966652pab.30.1400174170708; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x22d.google.com (mail-oa0-x22d.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id la2si145772igb.1.2014.05.15.10.16.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d; Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l6so1638155oag.18 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.133.81 with SMTP id pa17mr11585295oeb.35.1400174169976; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.151.1 with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.151.1 with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <25B055499F67420FA34794323F9A95AB@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 18:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] the future of Lojban's leadership From: And Rosta To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b47280006735804f9737487 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b47280006735804f9737487 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wish this proposal well and think it would be beneficial for Lojban. (One small thing: possibly delusorily I find it more comfortable to know the name and identity of folk I interact with; if a nontrivial number of others feel likewise then perhaps we might be told the name and identity of our indubitably amiable and deservedly esteemed Selpahi.) --And. On 15 May 2014 12:39, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas" wrote: > > Excellent news! I wholeheartedly approve. .i'e ui > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Alex Burka wrote: > >> coi lo jbopre >> >> My name is Dustin and you might know me as ldlework or mokau or cadgu'a. >> I'm >> writing to announce the current motion to nominate selpa'i as the curren= t >> warden >> for the language in a provisionally official capacity contingent on the >> general >> attitudes professed by the community's response to the motion. selpa'i >> would be >> replacing Robin Lee Powell in this position. >> >> Currently, the IRC and Facebook communities have been approached. The >> response so >> far has been extremely positive with a current count of 20 to 1 in favor >> of the >> motion. Broca of the BPFK has given his provisional support of the motio= n >> and Ali >> Sajid Imami of the LLG has given positive approval. >> >> Robin Lee Powell has declared that he will abstain from voting >> explicitly, citing >> personal reasons but has offered the following words (edited for clarity= ): >> >> rlpowell: I confirm [that] I'd [just] as soon someone else took my >> Lojbanic authority. >> rlpowell: I'm ever so slightly mildly skeptical about selpa'i >> specifically because >> he's not well known throughout the community the way I was. >> rlpowell: I'm mildly worried that his lack of presence there will lead >> to schism or something. >> rlpowell: Having said that, I certainly don't know of anybody *better* >> suited for the job. >> rlpowell: and I, personally, like him and his attitude towards Lojban. >> >> >> So what will this actually mean for the community and the language? >> >> As it stands Lojban is a vibrant community of speakers of a wide range o= f >> fluency. >> At the tail end, some extremely active and hard-working jbopre have, ove= r >> the >> years, contributed many efforts to the language such as translations, >> music but >> also proposals of enhancements or refinements of various aspects of the >> language >> including its grammar, cmavo and general lexicon. However without an >> active >> leadership many of these modifications remain in conversational limbo >> where they >> are discussed for years in vain since there is no explicit mechanism for >> integration into the language or lexicon. New speakers get confused at t= he >> apparent lack of consensus. >> >> selpa'i would be the figurehead for the re-activation of this explicit >> mechanism for >> integration. If you are familiar with software development, this >> responsibility is >> synonymous with that of a repository maintainer. In that sense, he will >> have the >> authority to merge pull requests back into the repository thereby making >> the change >> "official". The authority to perform the "last-step" approval or >> disapproval of any >> of the number of outstanding or future proposals that may take place is >> what allows >> the language to continue to evolve and adapt to the creativity and usage >> of its >> userbase. >> >> I ask that everyone refrain from accusations of dictatorship and other >> similarly >> colored arguments. Lojban has always had an acting leadership for all of >> the >> utilities mentioned above. The motion should not in anyway be interprete= d >> that >> selpa'i is solely responsible for engineering proposals and that all our >> own >> responsibilities to partake in the creative process have been revoked. O= n >> the >> contrary, with an actually active leadership we hope that the motion wil= l >> encourage >> those who tend to think very deeply about the nuance of Lojban's various >> systems to >> feel more confident that they have a venue through which their ideas may >> actually >> one day be realized. >> >> Furthermore, if selpa'i is indeed found to be an acceptable leader for >> our lovely >> language a major effort will be made to "open source" the language. We >> have a PEG >> grammar, reference material, and a lexicon all of which are data that ca= n >> be >> managed with principles and procedures that more resemble the management >> of a >> software development. The intention is to make the entire process >> extremely more >> visible and open with actual mechanisms for structured review and >> integration just >> like in the software world. I hope it is readily apparent how this could >> be an >> incredible boon for the direct democracy that so many desire. >> >> Lastly, I will speak a bit about selpa'i himself. As I have known him, h= e >> has >> demonstrated a prowess of the language that I have yet to see matched in= a >> demonstrated way. His deep familiarity with not only the various >> grammatical >> systems but their nuance, their great qualities and their systemic >> inefficiencies >> is really inspiring. As one of the most active jbopre, he continuously >> emits >> high-quality literary translations, and even music. He is an active Lojb= an >> teacher with a number of current students that he lectures and gives >> formal >> training to. The guy can *rap* in Lojban :) I invite you to read his >> active blog >> which is where most of his published thinking on Lojban resides: >> http://selpahi.weebly.com/ * >> and also many of his Lojban writings are available at: >> http://selpahi.de/ >> >> * NB: The blog posts are proposals only! I think they show a depth of >> thinking >> about the language. But the intended work is completely community-driven >> and >> no-one intends to implement proposals without wide support. >> >> Here is a current log of everyone who has given a direct response to the >> motion >> (which will be updated as the motion is on-going): >> >> https://gist.github.com/durka/cdf733d1ec95333fb9e7 >> >> Here is log of the discussion that has taken place on facebook as of thi= s >> writing: https://gist.github.com/dustinlacewell/115350f17f09efc9aa3f >> >> Please, use this thread to voice your approval or disapproval for this >> motion. If >> you disapprove it is enough to say so and give a bit of reasoning behind >> why you >> think so. Long digressions will make it difficult to ascertain an accura= te >> distilling of everyone's approval or disapproval. Nays will be counted >> regardless >> of their length! :) >> >> Thank you for reading! If you'd like to participate in a more real-time >> discourse, >> I highly encourage you to visit #lojban on Freenode IRC. If you're >> unfamiliar with that, you can use http://webchat.freenode.net/ to join. >> >> .i finti fa la'o gy Dustin Lacewell gy no'u la'o irci ldlework irci no'u >> la mokau >> .i cusku'i fa la'o gy Alex Burka gy no'u la'o irci durka42 irci >> .i mu'o >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s >> "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n >> email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b47280006735804f9737487 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I wish this proposal well and think it would be beneficial f= or Lojban.

(One small thing: possibly delusorily I find it more comfort= able to know the name and identity of folk I interact with; if a nontrivial= number of others feel likewise then perhaps we might be told the name and = identity of our indubitably amiable and deservedly esteemed Selpahi.)

--And.

On 15 May 2014 12:39, "Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas&= quot; <jjllambias@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:

Excellent news! I wholeheartedly appro= ve. .i'e ui

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=



On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com> wrote:
coi lo jbopre

My name is = Dustin and you might know me as ldlework or mokau or cadgu'a. =C2=A0I&#= 39;m
writing to announce the current motion to nominate selpa'= ;i as the current warden
for the language in a provisionally official capacity contingent on th= e general
attitudes professed by the community's response to = the motion. selpa'i would be
replacing Robin Lee Powell in th= is position.

Currently, the IRC and Facebook communities have been a= pproached. The response so
far has been extremely positive with a= current count of 20 to 1 in favor of the
motion. Broca of the BP= FK has given his provisional support of the motion and Ali
Sajid Imami of the LLG has given positive approval.

Robin Lee Powell has declared that he will abstain from voting expli= citly, citing
personal reasons but has offered the following word= s (edited for clarity):

rlpowell: =C2=A0 I confirm [that] I'd [just] as soo= n someone else took my Lojbanic authority.
rlpowell: =C2=A0 I'= ;m ever so slightly mildly skeptical about selpa'i specifically because=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 he's not well known thro= ughout the community the way I was.
rlpowell: I'm mildly worried that his lack of presence t= here will lead to schism or something.
rlpowell: Having said that= , I certainly don't know of anybody *better* suited for the job.
<= div>rlpowell: and I, personally= , like him and his attitude towards Lojban.


So what will this actually mean for the = community and the language?

As it stands Lojban is= a vibrant community of speakers of a wide range of fluency.
At the tail end, some extremely active and hard-working jbopre have, over t= he
years, contributed many efforts to the language such as transl= ations, music but
also proposals of enhancements or refinements o= f various aspects of the language
including its grammar, cmavo and general lexicon. However without an a= ctive
leadership many of these modifications remain in conversati= onal limbo where they
are discussed for years in vain since there= is no explicit mechanism for
integration into the language or lexicon. New speakers get confused at= the
apparent lack of consensus.

selpa&#= 39;i would be the figurehead for the re-activation of this explicit mechani= sm for
integration. If you are familiar with software development, this respo= nsibility is
synonymous with that of a repository maintainer. In = that sense, he will have the
authority to merge pull requests bac= k into the repository thereby making the change
"official". The authority to perform the "last-step&quo= t; approval or disapproval of any
of the number of outstanding or= future proposals that may take place is what allows
the language= to continue to evolve and adapt to the creativity and usage of its
userbase.

I ask that everyone refrain from ac= cusations of dictatorship and other similarly
colored arguments. = Lojban has always had an acting leadership for all of the
utiliti= es mentioned above. The motion should not in anyway be interpreted that
selpa'i is solely responsible for engineering proposals and that a= ll our own
responsibilities to partake in the creative process ha= ve been revoked. On the
contrary, with an actually active leaders= hip we hope that the motion will encourage
those who tend to think very deeply about the nuance of Lojban's v= arious systems to
feel more confident that they have a venue thro= ugh which their ideas may actually
one day be realized.

Furthermore, if selpa'i is indeed found to be an ac= ceptable leader for our lovely
language a major effort will be ma= de to "open source" the language. We have a PEG
grammar= , reference material, and a lexicon all of which are data that can be
managed with principles and procedures that more resemble the manageme= nt of a
software development. The intention is to make the entire= process extremely more
visible and open with actual mechanisms f= or structured review and integration just
like in the software world. I hope it is readily apparent how this cou= ld be an
incredible boon for the direct democracy that so many de= sire.

Lastly, I will speak a bit about selpa'i= himself. As I have known him, he has
demonstrated a prowess of the language that I have yet to see matched = in a
demonstrated way. His deep familiarity with not only the var= ious grammatical
systems but their nuance, their great qualities = and their systemic inefficiencies
is really inspiring. As one of the most active jbopre, he continuously= emits
high-quality literary translations, and even music. He is = an active Lojban
teacher with a number of current students that h= e lectures and gives formal
training to. The guy can *rap* in Lojban :) I invite you to read his a= ctive blog
which is where most of his published thinking on Lojba= n resides:
and also many of his Lojban writings are available at:

* NB: The blog posts are proposals only! I think they show= a depth of thinking
about the=C2=A0language. But the intended work is completely community= -driven and
no-one intends to implement proposals=C2=A0without wi= de support.

Here is a current log of everyone who = has given a direct response to the motion
(which will be updated as the motion is on-going):
Here is log of the discussion that has taken place on facebo= ok as of this

Please, use this thread to voice your approval or disap= proval for this motion. If
you disapprove it is enough to say so = and give a bit of reasoning behind why you
think so. Long digress= ions will make it difficult to ascertain an accurate
distilling of everyone's approval or disapproval. Nays will be cou= nted regardless
of their length! :)

Than= k you for reading! If you'd like to participate in a more real-time dis= course,
I highly encourage you to visit #lojban on Freenode IRC. If you're=
unfamiliar with that, you can use http://webchat.freenode.net/ to join.

.i finti fa la'o gy Dustin Lacewell gy no'u la&= #39;o irci ldlework irci no'u la mokau
.i cusku'i fa la&#= 39;o gy Alex Burka gy no'u la'o irci durka42 irci
.i mu&#= 39;o

=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b47280006735804f9737487--