Received: from mail-ob0-f192.google.com ([209.85.214.192]:59357) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wl0TN-000677-La for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:50 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f192.google.com with SMTP id va2sf415282obc.9 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=upaUE6DQmwijLkDc78GO8CnXXpQMl+7dfuEAd0zPXU8=; b=jh2iD+rCrNjUC8XIx0uCjwTvhAb3XxQVKMhLM5Kfvrwl3XRFFVkTgZUnNoetwsqVo/ Iz/Nd2884VJCQCrj5Uj7DpSGKQmiNqIuIPsMGukZ8Kh1KhneIELxQOSTTBpXwjdpIrmJ e2LTlM8z51R9bnZmon06CuN6SfCkdDppn2sIBFNLkV2ZbQ2b0XFqz3h+i9QZ5Kq2VIOg b7DR2jfkvBNH2mWrEfM/ZRpnO4r801yiP8voltjG44IMdJ2z/sz6K5PkP3pt4ZUCc1ku CRtrm7L/ykg3WNQ/00pTO9Fjil0L2+Cq28KvY/EGFD5rCz6Cyai2Qkr3Od0mEsniL4k0 xTsQ== X-Received: by 10.50.49.104 with SMTP id t8mr356500ign.9.1400178812243; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.20.134 with SMTP id n6ls4190155ige.27.canary; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.206.77 with SMTP id ft13mr5014644icb.22.1400178811776; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ga1si832904qcb.0.2014.05.15.11.33.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233; Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q107so2460474qgd.10 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.15.137 with SMTP id k9mr6149332qaa.104.1400178811650; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.33.137 with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140515175858.0992893b@aol.com> References: <20140515175858.0992893b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:33:31 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "bu letteral" and "zei lujvo" From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc912eb0c94604f97488be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7bdc912eb0c94604f97488be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM, 'Wuzzy' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Of course, the question how to say this in Lojban came up. > Xorxes suggested =E2=80=9Cbu letteral=E2=80=9D to be lojbanized as =E2=80= =9Czo bu zei lerfu=E2=80=9D. > This looks strange and unintitive to me. I am not even sure if this is > grammatical and if yes, under _which_ grammar? xD PEG? YACC? Something > else? > After the Magic Words reform, which to my understanding coincided with the writing of the PEG, {zo WORD} is a single word for purposes of word counting. Word counting is relevant to {si}, {bu}, and {zei}, and I think nothing else, provided we exclude experimental cmavo. This means {zo si si} is the empty string, {zo bu zei lerfu} is a valid lujvo, and {zo bu bu} is a valid lerfu. mi'e la latro'a mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bdc912eb0c94604f97488be Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, May 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM, 'Wuzzy' via lojban = <lojban@goo= glegroups.com> wrote:
Of course, the question how to say this in L= ojban came up.
Xorxes suggested =E2=80=9Cbu letteral=E2=80=9D to be lojbanized as =E2=80= =9Czo bu zei lerfu=E2=80=9D.
This looks strange and unintitive to me. I am not even sure if this is
grammatical and if yes, under _which_ grammar? xD PEG? YACC? Something
else?
After the Magic Words reform, which to my unders= tanding coincided with the writing of the PEG, {zo WORD} is a single word f= or purposes of word counting. Word counting is relevant to {si}, {bu}, and = {zei}, and I think nothing else, provided we exclude experimental cmavo. Th= is means {zo si si} is the empty string, {zo bu zei lerfu} is a valid lujvo= , and {zo bu bu} is a valid lerfu.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bdc912eb0c94604f97488be--