Received: from mail-ve0-f192.google.com ([209.85.128.192]:58793) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wl36E-0007aD-2L for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:22:15 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f192.google.com with SMTP id oz11sf457180veb.9 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=U9Fg6RnbBOeqm0AAHs5HP+7xHPuDY4UasOHV8C4csBA=; b=SisN3mUGJ2snWdW+a1oTbFUs1w9qnUsxTBWXr2t3oVhPf0eb35qrhpkDmNIWcZjWjE tFwvjvU4Zkh37GwWABh3J9e0KZ2WBDkbMDIda42W47ccA3H2iHjtGWxi2ibu3k+7Ms5p qcnx5QuMkheMURqGdIA0kJScGBq/+3ZtEUa4jYrM4Abr+nCAs/MRXNYJ5byL+KZuWEjK ThB7WOgaSRTlLcffgz2NQYFuKIpx10qBRkHxG03EmYAT8WwEW9Dko8OcONMVI4WKOBBj zaJdio+GRxmoNx4zA72un8bvhwSEyNIOgAAtM3gDClw+5T5T4bCmioTq4oYoACJBGa1N EjVQ== X-Received: by 10.50.62.6 with SMTP id u6mr380707igr.15.1400188911656; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.66.237 with SMTP id i13ls29782igt.32.gmail; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.235.144 with SMTP id kg16mr5606625icb.33.1400188911211; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id on5si372904vdb.0.2014.05.15.14.21.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b; Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id lc6so5142934vcb.2 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.147.200 with SMTP id tm8mr56675vdb.54.1400188911109; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140515175858.0992893b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 18:21:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] "bu letteral" and "zei lujvo" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52e642baa6ee804f976e2da X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec52e642baa6ee804f976e2da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ian Johnson wrote= : > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM, 'Wuzzy' via lojban < > lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> Of course, the question how to say this in Lojban came up. >> Xorxes suggested =E2=80=9Cbu letteral=E2=80=9D to be lojbanized as =E2= =80=9Czo bu zei lerfu=E2=80=9D. >> This looks strange and unintitive to me. I am not even sure if this is >> grammatical and if yes, under _which_ grammar? xD PEG? YACC? Something >> else? >> > After the Magic Words reform, which to my understanding coincided with th= e > writing of the PEG, {zo WORD} is a single word for purposes of word > counting. > Sort of. It's a single word for those magic words that look back (so for "bu", for the left side of "zei", for "si"), but it's not a single word for magic words that look forward (you can't quote it with "zo", you can't use it as the right side component of "zei". Magic words that look forward will just see "zo" as a word, so "zo zo cmavo" is a full bridi, not a quote of "zo cmavo". "zo bu zei lerfu" works both for PEG and for YACC, with the caveat that YACC uses a pre-parsing lexing process before the actual YACC kicks in. > Word counting is relevant to {si}, {bu}, and {zei}, and I think nothing > else, provided we exclude experimental cmavo. This means {zo si si} is th= e > empty string, {zo bu zei lerfu} is a valid lujvo, and {zo bu bu} is a val= id > lerfu. > Yes, "si", "bu" and "zei" need to know what counts as "previous word". but "zo" and "zei" need to know what counts as "next word". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --bcaec52e642baa6ee804f976e2da Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ian Johnson <= blindbravado@gm= ail.com> wrote:
=
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:58 AM= , 'Wuzzy' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>= wrote:
Of course, the question how to say this in L= ojban came up.
Xorxes suggested =E2=80=9Cbu letteral=E2=80=9D to be lojbanized as =E2=80= =9Czo bu zei lerfu=E2=80=9D.
This looks strange and unintitive to me. I am not even sure if this is
grammatical and if yes, under _which_ grammar? xD PEG? YACC? Something
else?
After the Magic Words reform, which to my = understanding coincided with the writing of the PEG, {zo WORD} is a single = word for purposes of word counting.

Sort of. =C2=A0It's a single word for those magic w= ords that look back (so for "bu", for the left side of "zei&= quot;, for "si"), but it's not a single word for magic words = that look forward (you can't quote it with "zo", you can'= t use it as the right side component of "zei". Magic words that l= ook forward will just see "zo" as a word, so "zo zo cmavo&qu= ot; is a full bridi, not a quote of "zo cmavo".=C2=A0

"zo bu zei lerfu" works both for PEG and for = YACC, with the caveat that YACC uses a pre-parsing lexing process before th= e actual YACC kicks in.

=C2=A0
Word counting is relevant to {si}, {bu}, and {zei}, and I think nothing el= se, provided we exclude experimental cmavo. This means {zo si si} is the em= pty string, {zo bu zei lerfu} is a valid lujvo, and {zo bu bu} is a valid l= erfu.

Yes, "si", &qu= ot;bu" and "zei" need to know what counts as "previous = word". but "zo" and "zei" need to know what counts= as "next word".=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--bcaec52e642baa6ee804f976e2da--