Received: from mail-pb0-f63.google.com ([209.85.160.63]:58095) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wm3FZ-00053a-Lv for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:53 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f63.google.com with SMTP id rr13sf1349706pbb.8 for ; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=rrRKyu/eRFFVLnNbTLykhUVfvDGRJ/bmgtOWFqlyqf4=; b=Q0aH/uSTczFLI91qyimM4iCiIQZOeioMx+HnyILO+EDdFwlXYtlOlNsXSQuWgT4WZ7 +QfmsCEcEHwNqrsxXYD0N0tKtBp6qEAf+unY7BNtLa/KX7PHWyrBwH5m3VH5ntkpIPKk XmnYxR75wWBNDSKxbJ1HGaUngli+WiztghkMpBFXECEaLs6BJTSUIydrEShcuJnACGpR riFlQweJ0+KAE8oJaf+dwy76zFprDEUHSkSSk76cTcKXdMGQmrmdGw5bqTbE3gzxLnPF DULcFP1dF45oSXRTfdTZBODLw6hqrzrpFeelDhboYop26vzbrtgVJuiX0/ktpiZpcVQB Wb3Q== X-Received: by 10.140.47.201 with SMTP id m67mr36qga.29.1400427818927; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.86.163 with SMTP id p32ls1391246qgd.42.gmail; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.94.163 with SMTP id dd3mr6364331veb.29.1400427818615; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vl16si877010vdb.1.2014.05.18.08.43.38 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b; Received: by mail-vc0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id lc6so8425163vcb.16 for ; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.175.69 with SMTP id by5mr7731927vdc.16.1400427818546; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sun, 18 May 2014 08:43:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5378CE5C.3040702@gmail.com> References: <5378CE5C.3040702@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:43:38 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] cidja From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171e1fa87f7304f9ae8216 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec5171e1fa87f7304f9ae8216 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Ilmen wrote: > coi ro do > > Some times ago the question of whether {cidja} implies solid food only or > includes beverages as well has been raised on IRC. > > Let's look at {cidja}'s definition: > > * "x1 is food/feed/nutriment for x2; x1 is edible/gives nutrition to x2" > > According to this definition, it seems perfectly sensible to create a > lujvo {likydja} (litki cidja) for drink/beverage, as those are also a > source of nutrition (which seems to be the underlying concept of {cidja}). > Things like soups or baby formula are clearly likydja, but I'm not sure how nutritious things like vodka or sodas are. > {ligdja} (sligu cidja) could be used for solid food specifically. > > gismu are intended to have broad meanings, and we don't have any brivla > for "beverage". > > What's your opinion on that matter? Would you agree that a beverage is a > {cidja}? > "selpinxe" is the word I've always seen used for "beverage". That of course raises the question of whether something that nobody ever drinks can still qualify as a selpinxe, and whether something someone drinks but is not potable qualifies as a selpinxe. One way out of that is to say that "selpinxe" is not necessarily identical with "se pinxe". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --bcaec5171e1fa87f7304f9ae8216 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com= > wrote:
coi ro do

Some times ago the question of whether {cidja} implies solid food only or i= ncludes beverages as well has been raised on IRC.

Let's look at {cidja}'s definition:

* "x1 is food/feed/nutriment for x2; x1 is edible/gives nutrition to x= 2"

According to this definition, it seems perfectly sensible to create a lujvo= {likydja} (litki cidja) for drink/beverage, as those are also a source of = nutrition (which seems to be the underlying concept of {cidja}).


Things like soups or baby formula are cl= early likydja, but I'm not sure how nutritious things like vodka or sod= as are.

=C2=A0
{ligdja} (sligu cidja) could be used for solid food specifically.

gismu are intended to have broad meanings, and we don't have any brivla= for "beverage".

What's your opinion on that matter? Would you agree that a beverage is = a {cidja}?

"selpinxe" is the = word I've always seen used for "beverage". That of course rai= ses the question of whether something that nobody ever drinks can still qua= lify as a selpinxe, and whether something someone drinks but is not potable= qualifies as a selpinxe. One way out of that is to say that "selpinxe= " is not necessarily identical with "se pinxe".

mu'o mi'e xorxes=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--bcaec5171e1fa87f7304f9ae8216--