Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of craigbdaniel@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140523100439.GV19511@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <20140523095407.GU19511@samsa.fritz.box>
	<CAO7bV+jjjUBuGo8C6jMKVxi8ECq8RY=LJP00vmqMh6JO6dsrpw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140523100439.GV19511@samsa.fritz.box>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 06:16:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP=UV6rRTGM4VDiZfxhY3KW_Gz4+j+zYW37P3VRwKKaxM2Okhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Who needs the LLG?
From: Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:04 AM, v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:55:43PM +0400, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
>> I think it's a misunderstanding. Did he mean BPFK?
>
> Not as far as I understood him. He explicitly stated that
> (at least) he is not at all interested in attending an LLG meeting
> and considers them to rigid w.r.t. language changes.

If people with ideas don't participate in the body that defines
policy, then yes, it is rigid.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.