Received: from mail-pb0-f55.google.com ([209.85.160.55]:45027) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WoCyu-0001nF-EM for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:33 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f55.google.com with SMTP id jt11sf1572049pbb.20 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=go6dOZoC7YLPjvURQcGTIx+7SkncT9kfDRKS2RlMjPo=; b=asO2ib1x2XMsQohUeD9J2j+PlZHMXhBZ3T1LVv94e1mQUTr8Ewj1PmOWgO7cpQxIwq 8bekfbws+5IzEK0MQLNwTUF1Mi9E6gGXJ2RAbK4pVCg11GwVgSfhWx3OyvFTLottY0HW wJVmrtXemo7rBSWRZH9yNw/kgFvg2NtQcrdIfCphqX9iLbdEtCYCfoKGZr+XKd6VhoRh D9sXlV6zfcGUg1fxrfhjG5boUZ9yfI/ihqlYhbdwXSSXBb/tZXXsHhFnFQniO4MfXniY hVBR7oZdCWYtdgucTltvD4OXg21MXvTfKLJVrRLNXpDSWL0cZzKNLbi7mNGfslX7C9G3 OYMA== X-Received: by 10.50.92.34 with SMTP id cj2mr233449igb.4.1400941881699; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.66.2 with SMTP id b2ls860951igt.5.canary; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.111.15 with SMTP id ie15mr4713980igb.2.1400941881064; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x234.google.com (mail-ve0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fj1si361092vdc.3.2014.05.24.07.31.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234; Received: by mail-ve0-x234.google.com with SMTP id db12so7629814veb.11 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.252.231 with SMTP id zv7mr727554vdc.36.1400941880948; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sat, 24 May 2014 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 11:31:20 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e6302a435404fa263326 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a1135e6302a435404fa263326 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Another revision of gimste done by me is complete. > > I based it on excellent simple definitions of gismu made by la .aionys. > (.io) but changed them here and there. > The most important difference is that I specified possible sumti types for > each place. > E.g. > (event) - an event place. {nu} or any other place like nicte1 that has > {nu} inside is possible for this place. > (assertion) - du'u > (property) - ka with ce'u referring to x1 of the current gismu > (property of x2) - ka with ce'u referring to x2 of the current gismu > One of the rare sumti types is e.g. (ordered set) that requires using > {ce'o}. > > Places with just x1, x2... without a sumti type specified imply "object" > sumti type (e.g. mlatu1) > > Do you have a full list of the types you used? When you flag a place with a type, do you mean that no other type is allowed in that place, or just that at least the mentioned type is allowed? The gismu that changed their place structure are: > zabna, mabla, traji, satci, konju > There are many gismu with place structure "x1 is a ... (some shape) of material x2". If you remove the material place from "konju", wouldn't it also make sense to remove it from bolci, slanu, clupa, djine, bliku, tapla, tubnu, grana, bidju, dirgo, and many others? Why "konju" specifically? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1135e6302a435404fa263326 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name= @gmail.com> wrote:
Another revision of gi= mste done by me is complete.

I based it on excelle= nt simple definitions of gismu made by la .aionys. (.io) but changed them h= ere and there.
The most important difference is that I specified possible sumti types= for each place.
E.g.
(event) - an event place. {nu} or any other place like = nicte1 that has {nu} inside is possible for this place.
(assertio= n) - du'u
(property) - ka with ce'u referring to x1 of th= e current gismu
(property of x2) - ka with ce'u referring to x2=C2=A0of the curren= t gismu
One of the rare sumti types is e.g. (ordered set) that requires = using {ce'o}.

Places with just x1, x2... witho= ut a sumti type specified imply "object" sumti type (e.g. mlatu1)=


Do you have a full li= st of the types you used? When you flag a place with a type, do you mean th= at no other type is allowed in that place, or just that at least the mentio= ned type is allowed?=C2=A0


The gismu that changed their place structure are:
za= bna, mabla, traji, satci, konju

There are many gismu with plac= e structure "x1 is a ... (some shape) of material x2". If you rem= ove the material place from "konju", wouldn't it also make se= nse to remove it from bolci, slanu, clupa, djine, bliku, tapla, tubnu, gran= a, bidju, dirgo, and many others? Why "konju" specifically?=C2=A0=

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1135e6302a435404fa263326--