Received: from mail-wi0-f186.google.com ([209.85.212.186]:50559) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WodAS-0006p8-IN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:20 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f186.google.com with SMTP id hi2sf278309wib.3 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kdaLPXcjwuU91iwr4+dsADFeNoGUW16zjOjEpkDiexs=; b=O7ONVJVuSI7SIiVScnY8jZ75njas1guzu+RqkU0V5X+qRppaLthS1J/HfM3vDmJy54 Z3VD//d7n4sR2/XSeSMJFe46SfES2qIzdwfXMTG4DHCrnieNCauDtbnQhcNoQUmaasIZ JhK1mrZ2X30cl50uPdjnW+50RRFGKAPJcAOTHilzXcex4zt28lqKrO8IwV5gZ9vVwnDk fNqYL10ABkFBWCwYB9m9JDURBPke0vtuk1mCA7jsSYakwB+B9zfZJPAwBot4maXJN2yG h317tbXwL2tF0aebmJP1Ul86vvcffwFQtmPmq5iIhXbXCDbXCQt3B10/iSAtEjxxlncs OCmQ== X-Received: by 10.180.36.107 with SMTP id p11mr40306wij.7.1401042541535; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.104.168 with SMTP id gf8ls315924wib.35.gmail; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.78.101 with SMTP id a5mr1411613wix.7.1401042540799; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ng3si358948wic.0.2014.05.25.11.29.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dlacewell@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::236; Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t60so6941358wes.41 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.77.225 with SMTP id v1mr20643798wiw.5.1401042540704; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.60.129 with HTTP; Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53823241.5020708@lojban.org> References: <53800942.9030407@lojban.org> <1400948010.93944.YahooMailNeo@web181103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <53D0F569-A434-4953-9A1A-3F8D2001A8BB@yahoo.com> <5380F63E.3070006@gmx.de> <5381C5B0.1000304@lojban.org> <538215D3.5050703@lojban.org> <53823241.5020708@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 11:29:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Balningau: The Great Update From: Dustin Lacewell To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: dlacewell@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dlacewell@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dlacewell@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c8246f439db04fa3da23e X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d043c8246f439db04fa3da23e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Did you just invoke your own death to bolster your position? Bob. We want to fix some things in the language within a realistic timeframe as to benefit from them without spending years doing uselessly tautological work to reflect in materials that we will shortly after rewrite, reflect a very out of date version of the language. How is it possible that we're talking about all these odd topics that don't seem to connect with solving that problem? Its like, the problem is simple, the solution is simple, and lots of people agree. If you stop this odd debate of trying to make us out to be some sort of insignificant traitors or untrue scotsmen, you might see that the things that have changed do improve the language and make things cleaner and more elegant and more useful for speech and communication. That improving the prescription more immediately to reflect modern usage, so that we can better go on teaching and advocating the language, is even contentious is boring. The debate is tired and apparently the arguments have become very weak. And odd. You made some odd arguments Bob. That don't really address the problem at all. The dogmas serve no one except those who are more interested in debating dogma and process rather than teaching lojban to new people and making sure the language is digestible and effective. You need to start speaking to realistic and practical short term solutions for those out there teaching and using the language. But I don't expect that to happen. Just reflect on the character of your tone and content. I don't realistically see you changing your mind and saying things that are actually realistic in helping solving our problems. Because of course we don't exist, and probably don't even speak "Lojban" as it could be officially called anyway right? Why are we not the first group to come along and suggest such editorializing of the language? Its because the language does not exist as just some mental object. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d043c8246f439db04fa3da23e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Did you just invoke your own death to bolster your positio= n?

Bob. We want to fix some things in the language withi= n a realistic timeframe as to benefit from them without spending years doin= g uselessly tautological work to reflect in materials that we will shortly = after rewrite, reflect a very out of date version of the language. How is i= t possible that we're talking about all these odd topics that don't= seem to connect with solving that problem?

Its like, the problem is simple, the solution is simple= , and lots of people agree. If you stop this odd debate of trying to make u= s out to be some sort of insignificant traitors or untrue scotsmen, you mig= ht see that the things that have changed do improve the language and make t= hings cleaner and more elegant and more useful for speech and communication= .

That improving the prescription more immediately to ref= lect modern usage, so that we can better go on teaching and advocating the = language, is even contentious is boring. The debate is tired and apparently= the arguments have become very weak. And odd. You made some odd arguments = Bob. That don't really address the problem at all.=C2=A0

The dogmas serve no one except those who are more inter= ested in debating dogma and process rather than teaching lojban to new peop= le and making sure the language is digestible and effective. You need to st= art speaking to realistic and practical short term solutions for those out = there teaching and using the language. But I don't expect that to happe= n. Just reflect on the character of your tone and content. I don't real= istically see you changing your mind and saying things that are actually re= alistic in helping solving our problems. Because of course we don't exi= st, and probably don't even speak "Lojban" as it could be off= icially called anyway right?

Why are we not the first group to come along and sugges= t such editorializing =C2=A0of the language? Its because the language does = not exist as just some mental object.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d043c8246f439db04fa3da23e--