Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.18;
Message-ID: <5384A3B0.2080404@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:39:44 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Balningau: The Great Update
References: <b3d39fc1-7bcf-42c7-accf-5bf992ff183d@googlegroups.com>	<20140525161129.7cff160d@aol.com>	<53820348.509@gmx.de> <20140527155010.6a07cc0f@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140527155010.6a07cc0f@aol.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

la .uuz=C3=ACt. cu cusku di'e
> Am Sun, 25 May 2014 16:50:48 +0200
> schrieb selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>:
>
>> This is already happening both with gismu and with cmavo. Some people
>> use a word one way, and others use it another way. Try to compare
>> some texts and you will find conflicting usage.
> Then this is because some Lojbanists tend to be clumsy when trying to
> use Lojban. They are people, after all, and people make mistakes. This
> includes me. Simple: Some people use Lojban correctly, the other people
> use it incorrectly. How is tinkering with the gismu list helping here?

io .i li'a lo nu sapyzengau lo gimste cu se jalge lo nu lo pilno cu=20
jdika lo ka xo kau roi srera .i ku'i mi na troci lo ka gasnu lo nu do=20
tugni .i la balningau cu se zukte lo ba'e xa'o jinvi be lo du'u ge lo=20
gimste ka'e melze'a gi lo nu cnegau cu xamgu .i .e'u do tolju'i se ba'i=20
lo nu damba .i la balningau cu fasnu

> Then again they are simply ignoring Lojban as it stands today. They
> are, willfully or not, breaking the rules. It=E2=80=99s simple as that.
> Besides: I don=E2=80=99t even see what=E2=80=99s wrong with the =E2=80=9C=
old=E2=80=9D x3 place of
> traji.
>
> And please give evidence for the =E2=80=9Clots of people=E2=80=9D part.

.a'u cu'i .i .e'u ko zenba lo ka jundi la jbogu'e .i ja ko pilno la=20
korpora zei sisku

>> , lots of people use {mabla} with
>> a new definition.
> I never saw anyone who used =E2=80=9Cmabla=E2=80=9D in itself at all. Ple=
ase give
> examples.

ja'o do io na banzu jundi la jbogu'e .i na nabmi .i ku'i lo du'u so'i da=20
pilno zo mabla cu jetnu .i ki'u ma do sruma lo du'u jifxu'a .i cizra mi=20
.i ke'u lo nu pilno la korpora zei sisku cu cumki .i .e'u io do ga sidju=20
gi tolju'i

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.