Received: from mail-oa0-f57.google.com ([209.85.219.57]:59669) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WqUr8-0002Il-Dp for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:58 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f57.google.com with SMTP id n16sf616931oag.12 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=tKlKSv9zLkXC04U0+czYmcINmzRrMz4oFmIggGj1X98=; b=Ws01omJ0vzKlCEqudTfCtRpMg/eXaJ9MvdBORAKkdEyA6lrNR4ZuQDU2eCu8sPPDmx Bj0ZitU3hG8WqmMvnRimDnhr3fk3EZGUTINpuLEA0Jp8CwUwEk/5MRJp+vYYJDjz0JaL 6Cpbodz2SePBvnQ0BAncxCn/Qx+zdoNuT/7sLrqWpa+IAO3dVqq5VtfacnNOhAviJ6gg xR7pxUPtulVOiNHf9Dyvu0ZXHHANlNb8klhSOomeot+pC/gB1NuZsj9TIEm21W6riX+x OeSYIXlm5QSRh89BLUMN4Qz+G0yEouoV0WAtBY/LeyC1E/3nV6IsuVuylIdg/KFi09sm dJbw== X-Received: by 10.50.137.67 with SMTP id qg3mr8623igb.2.1401487248183; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.78.167 with SMTP id c7ls648989igx.27.gmail; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.206.77 with SMTP id ft13mr6731452icb.22.1401487247505; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x233.google.com (mail-ve0-x233.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pr8si369704vdb.1.2014.05.30.15.00.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::233; Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id oy12so2835825veb.38 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.143.6 with SMTP id sa6mr13986216vdb.22.1401487247359; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:00:47 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d576489466b04faa52d4d X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b5d576489466b04faa52d4d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > okay, everything fixed acc. to your suggestions. > > I still see issues on gismu with properties. For example, "jibni" has x2 (same type as x1), but "darno" has x2 (object). I agree that the x2 has to be of the same type as x1 in these but then objects and events must share the same type (spatio-temporal entities), since events can be close to objects in position. I think all the comparatives should have x2 same type as x1, they must be things that can have the same property. Same goes for klesi, jibni and others. Is the x2 of porsi an assertion, or should it be a (transitive, antisymmetric, total) binary relation? I think "porsi" works something like "li pa ce'o li re ce'o li ci cu porsi lo ka ce'u mleca ce'u" What's the difference between a property and an aspect? ("Aspect" comes in handy to cluster al the cultural words together when sorting, but does it mean anything different from "property"?) For mupli you have "x2 (property of x2)". mupli/fadni/traji/cnano/rirci should have the same for x3, and it should be the same type as x1 (a group of that type). If you have x3 as a set, then property x2 is not a property of x3, but a property of the members of x3. And let's drop x3 and x4 of girzu! mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b5d576489466b04faa52d4d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Gleki Arxokuna &= lt;gleki.is= .my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
okay, everything fixed acc. to your sugge= stions.


I sti= ll see issues on gismu with properties. For example, "jibni" has = x2 (same type as x1), but "darno" has x2 (object). I agree that t= he x2 has to be of the same type as x1 in these but then objects and events= must share the same type (spatio-temporal entities), since events can be c= lose to objects in position. I think all the comparatives should have x2 sa= me type as x1, they must be things that can have the same property. Same go= es for klesi, jibni and others.

Is the x2 of porsi an assertion, or should it be a (tra= nsitive, antisymmetric, total) binary relation? I think "porsi" w= orks something like "li pa ce'o li re ce'o li ci cu porsi lo k= a ce'u mleca ce'u"=C2=A0

What's the difference between a property and an asp= ect? ("Aspect" comes in handy to cluster al the cultural words to= gether when sorting, but does it mean anything different from "propert= y"?)

For mupli you have "x2= (property of x2)". mupli/fadni/tr= aji/cnano/rirci should have the same for x3, and it should be the same type= as x1 (a group of that type). If you have x3 as a set, then property x2 is= not a property of x3, but a property of the members of x3.=C2=A0

And let's drop x3 and x4 of girzu!

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b5d576489466b04faa52d4d--