Received: from mail-ie0-f188.google.com ([209.85.223.188]:53365) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WsJus-00074d-D5 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:24 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f188.google.com with SMTP id rd18sf28006iec.15 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+owKOdbnPeIBcdW83rRIvamxqd1VZphr/tlJpu47lYM=; b=GDeKP8bmks2f1Ks47xQkwqoZErkkm+puuG1NaY3ztLosHtBR6xPqkLpQcaRT9hr0/L lSLiPmfhQaQN5h6s6mrFC8OV/R3KVGMH6/z5BhqiMmicgKpkqVukJEJgsWZW3xUek3gH RYCm1gEn4JUh8+B/DdY2uP2bakHQzek7uo/FY3aropgGmiAHKdHZr3Ahu1qhorlMNb3Q Xb+P4+6rYcksek8TayQukm0daA7ePOqiPza5ZKYgoZAPH4DyB2CwgAR9zj+wEJZ23uju jQ6Y7e3pONvziup6t4/0suOOjE8LYUapUeg5ppFKPnIcIV5RprdOUgMpkpdsmMJnSV4C 8i8w== X-Received: by 10.140.49.227 with SMTP id q90mr87044qga.22.1401921852183; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.89.203 with SMTP id v69ls3303131qgd.6.gmail; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.89.114 with SMTP id b78mr20069457yhf.13.1401921851906; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x234.google.com (mail-vc0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ds6si228490vdb.0.2014.06.04.15.44.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234; Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hq11so200415vcb.39 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.123.71 with SMTP id ly7mr46756330veb.11.1401921851793; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:44:11 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115f0a2faa75204fb0a5def X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e0115f0a2faa75204fb0a5def Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > I want a gimste that would teach 1. te sumti interactions 2. what type can > go into each place. 3. how plurality is formed inside each place if > applicable. > > If you can see other goals (like e.g. improving semantic categorization) > you are free to add new columns or ask me if it requires some automation. > More than a semantic categorization, I'd like a categorization of place structures with relatively few categories, each category with many members. Categories such as "x1 is a ... consisting of x2", "x1 is a ... of x2", "x1 is ... in property x2", "x1 is ... relative to x2 in property x3", "x1 feels ... about x2", and so on. > Out of {ce'o}, {jo'u}, {joi} casnu1 can accept {jo'u} but not {ce'o}, > If a queue of people are discussing something, or if they are just taking turns to speak, could that not be a porsi discussing something? porsi1 can accept {ce'o} but not {jo'u} (unless that jo'u connect sumti > then connected with {ce'o} again, right? > What about "lo latmo selyle'u jo'u lo xelso selyle'u cu porsi", with no "ce'o" involved? If I define > porsi1 as "x1 (any type; {ce'o} for showing sequence)" > casnu1 as just "x1 (any type)" > gunma as "x1 (any type; {joi} for showing mass)" > would it be okay? > Personally, I avoid the word "mass". I also avoid using "joi", since I prefer "ko'a jo'u ko'e" for a plural reference and "lo gunma be ko'a jo'u ko'e" for a reference to the emerging group. Which places besides porsi1 are you going to be marking with ce'o? liste1? lerfu2? pruce4? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e0115f0a2faa75204fb0a5def Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@= gmail.com> wrote:
=

I want= a gimste that would teach 1. te sumti interactions 2. what type can go int= o each place. 3. how plurality is formed inside each place if applicable.

If you can see other goals (like e.g. improving s= emantic categorization) you are free to add new columns or ask me if it req= uires some automation.

More than a semantic categorization, I'd like a categorization of = place structures with relatively few categories, each category with many me= mbers. Categories such as "x1 is a ... consisting of x2", "x= 1 is a ... of x2", "x1 is ... in property x2", "x1 is .= .. relative to x2 in property x3", "x1 feels ... about x2", = and so on. =C2=A0=C2=A0

=C2=A0
Out of {ce&= #39;o}, {jo'u}, {joi} casnu1 can accept {jo'u} but not {ce'o}, =

If a queue of people are= discussing something, or if they are just taking turns to speak, could tha= t not be a porsi discussing something?

porsi1 can accept {ce'o} but not {jo'u} (unless that jo'u conn= ect sumti then connected with {ce'o} again, right?

What about "lo latmo selyle'u jo&= #39;u lo xelso selyle'u cu porsi", with no "ce'o" in= volved?
=C2=A0

If I define
porsi1 as "x1 (any type; {ce'o} for showing sequen= ce)"
casnu1 as just "x1 (any type)"
gunma as=C2= =A0"x1 (any type; {joi} for showing mass)"
would it be okay?

<= div>Personally, I avoid the word "mass". =C2=A0I also avoid using= "joi", since I prefer "ko'a jo'u ko'e" for= a plural reference and "lo gunma be ko'a jo'u ko'e" = for a reference to the emerging group.

Which places besides porsi1 are you going to be marking= with ce'o? liste1? lerfu2? pruce4? =C2=A0
=C2=A0
m= u'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e0115f0a2faa75204fb0a5def--