Received: from mail-pb0-f59.google.com ([209.85.160.59]:63899) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WshK7-0007Fw-FH for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:44:06 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f59.google.com with SMTP id uo5sf398020pbc.14 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:43:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Yl8iUDX58pDdP7LAPKphf+HpNKTKNp9o4kDwl/B2CHU=; b=oPIZFfYb3L+6pex4V4Gt18ZsWpI5ZQJaRokqCA7xv8l7pKQPWaefJC4SPcSwtE0Sh7 NgbxPcGJWoRXyYs1C/9IaOF6zUDJzRyU5Bjf4l2Wv+UFtbAm9XGZFP3pOZqmpMkvAEtN em7kOKL0W2G1UB7lbHRg2Jpbe8+9+1G2ykNzorTL+MyEtjvRBK19RnFhVgr651VcI47+ snQqSGPqEuj872ZSaaROh7yG2qSPDGO9H/bi06ETun7FWaDsOW0QXLSTRSroyRkCQwnx f2aMmwC9jaxZiBjwLQxsfU6WgH/MmQZee7Ylo+Y/W8qFO95omAzlHtQUqC4aBo3K2cUs oGOQ== X-Received: by 10.140.96.41 with SMTP id j38mr15337qge.8.1402011824175; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:43:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.89.104 with SMTP id u95ls462035qgd.5.gmail; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:43:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.26.105 with SMTP id b69mr145752yha.55.1402008790548; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ds6si417907vdb.0.2014.06.05.15.53.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b; Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id oz11so2109591veb.2 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:53:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.19.196 with SMTP id ql4mr876639vcb.64.1402008790429; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:53:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53903D84.90502@gmx.de> References: <53903D84.90502@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 19:53:10 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Specifying sumti types: another revision of gimste is complete From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11339b20ecf67e04fb1e9b56 X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11339b20ecf67e04fb1e9b56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:51 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e > > Which places besides porsi1 are you going to be marking with ce'o? >> liste1? lerfu2? pruce4? >> > > bridi3 seems to be an important one. I'm wondering if we should turn > {ce'o} from an "ordered {ce}" into an "ordered {jo'u}" to make it more > practical. As an ordered {ce}, we can't say {mi ce'o do nerkla}, but as > ordered {jo'u} we could. I think it is in practice used as an ordered "jo'u" more often than not. > Then porsi1 is an ordered plural, and things become more flexible. If it's not the case that "lo porsi cu gunma fi lo te porsi", then I don't see much point in "porsi" having three places though. I have been thinking of "porsi" as meaning "x1 is a sequence/queue/succession/row/series/train of x3" rather than as "x1 are in a sequence/queue/..." mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11339b20ecf67e04fb1e9b56 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:51 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:
la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e

Which places besides porsi1 are you going to be marking with ce'o?
liste1? lerfu2? pruce4?

bridi3 seems to be an important one. I'm wondering if we should turn {c= e'o} from an "ordered {ce}" into an "ordered {jo'u}&= quot; to make it more practical. As an ordered {ce}, we can't say {mi c= e'o do nerkla}, but as ordered {jo'u} we could.

I think it is in practice used as an ordered "jo&#= 39;u" more often than not. =C2=A0
=C2=A0
Then porsi1 is an ordered plural, and things become more flexible.

If it's not the case that "lo porsi cu gun= ma fi lo te porsi", then I don't see much point in "porsi&quo= t; having three places though. I have been thinking of "porsi" as= meaning "x1 is a sequence/queue/succession/row/series/train of x3&quo= t; rather than as "x1 are in a sequence/queue/..."

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11339b20ecf67e04fb1e9b56--