Received: from mail-oa0-f62.google.com ([209.85.219.62]:49842) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu7OL-0005qQ-Db for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:14 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f62.google.com with SMTP id j17sf735163oag.27 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3/QSWNPRf9kBIlpTnZPD/tero2Squh5umUL2QA2A8RI=; b=KADjXJQ3G4FKcQmhOc7cmLR4S3dtjR3ojA1h2IIs4VwIW8oQm1O0+Z2GdmdPHdTP9z GB2K0yi6jYEcRhe6CMcC31GteQccvVM9zyl2qodDimg8fhFXfz9B3Av41AoJa0RPZJlP yfeEekk1BD5FbW+9Zj36IqqyWzKgAswZdUZaReK/v8uz/rljt9Sr4gBM7RQBBXMaZ0DP MUN3uIST5uJxSvYn3aay0fxZxHl3HAIBwjvok0is2riBnTR5UrO4QnpAAXQCKa6EWPIm g5LDaoHjYhwvQNfBwQKSmM5gtcKY+Msx1xEltMpdYn/WztsuuT2KVGnK2ySnppubzlOn G2xw== X-Received: by 10.140.92.82 with SMTP id a76mr443067qge.1.1402350363359; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.96.201 with SMTP id k67ls1799521qge.22.gmail; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.34.47 with SMTP id w15mr1064663vei.20.1402350362914; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xn6si1295178vdc.2.2014.06.09.14.46.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230; Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id db12so4223775veb.35 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.53.12.229 with SMTP id et5mr24138181vdd.32.1402350362764; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:46:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:46:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Possession/transfer/exchange predicates From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133fa5e3929a304fb6e2300 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_bar: -- --001a1133fa5e3929a304fb6e2300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > >> >> canja/cerda/cirko/cnemu/dirba/dunda/friti/jdima/jerna/jinga/kargu/pleji/prali/vamji/vecnu >> >> There are other words that involve possession/transfer/exchange but for >> which the gismu list doesn't say anything explicitly about "sumti-raising", >> for example: >> claxu/pindi/ricfu/punji/sabji/jmina/dejni/jarco/lebna/cpacu/jbera/cuxna/vimcu/cpedu/mipri/sisku/sarji >> /cupra/dirce/ferti/xaksu/tisna/daspo/ralte >> >> It's a non-problem for me to correct {dunda}. The main obstacle for me is > that there might be much more than those 15 brivla that would allow > "object" => "property" change. > Indeed. I already listed 24 more. In my version of gimste all those places are marked as "located" and ... in > fact the majority of places are "located" throughout the gimste. > It is to be expected that the majority of places will be first and foremost for concrete objects. I think the biggest problem will be for those who are very anti-metaphor, or anti-unmarked metaphor, because they need to know exactly when a place admits a property in a literal sense and when it doesn't. For example, if I say "lo ka ce'u jbopre cu pagbu mi", is that literal or metaphoric? What about "lo ka ce'u senpi cu pagbu lo ka ce'u remna"? The official gismu list doesn't specify any types for "pagbu". What about "lo ka ce'u jbopre cu panlo mi"? mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1133fa5e3929a304fb6e2300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@= gmail.com> wrote:
=

canja/cerda/cirko/cnemu/dirba/dunda/friti/j= dima/jerna/jinga/kargu/pleji/prali/vamji/vecnu

There are other words that inv= olve possession/transfer/exchange but for which the gismu list doesn't = say anything explicitly about "sumti-raising", for example: claxu= /pindi/ricfu/punji/sabji/jmina/dejni/jarco/lebna/cpacu/jbera/cuxna/vimcu/cp= edu/mipri/sisku/sarji/cupra/dirce/ferti/xaksu/tisna/daspo/ralte

It's a non-problem for me = to correct {dunda}. The main obstacle for me is that there might be much mo= re than those 15 brivla that would allow "object" =3D> "p= roperty" change.

Indeed. I already listed= 24 more.=C2=A0

In my version o= f gimste all those places are marked as "located" and ... in fact= the majority of places are "located" throughout the gimste.

=C2=A0It is to be expect= ed that the majority of places will be first and foremost for concrete obje= cts. I think the biggest problem will be for those who are very anti-metaph= or, or anti-unmarked metaphor, because they need to know exactly when a pla= ce admits a property in a literal sense and when it doesn't. For exampl= e, if I say "lo ka ce'u jbopre cu pagbu mi", is that literal = or metaphoric? What about "lo ka ce'u senpi cu pagbu lo ka ce'= u remna"? The official gismu list doesn't specify any types for &q= uot;pagbu". What about "lo ka ce'u jbopre cu panlo mi"?= =C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1133fa5e3929a304fb6e2300--