Received: from mail-yk0-f184.google.com ([209.85.160.184]:50096) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XFAlV-0004s3-Gv for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:37:06 -0700 Received: by mail-yk0-f184.google.com with SMTP id 19sf692257ykq.21 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:36:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2ainO9kOlE+TgMWM44t+1aZfyGCeyxIhy6gCffxJyWE=; b=jLa8OUkeKoXjiDIUaulZm1XJF0Ymc7lOaQOEEfjk+r0Ft6Seyy8D4IicBRSjPkhSiC 8hguU5IeZbrDIwGT2/nkeYp/D21KuZna9Z7I5oH/f6aMdFPbkDsS11vOYqpAdjnXtwoM j+cgG4p2zKecmkb3yT8FDBROVORnshZZZsmTlYOynwT9pAUw8iIQ1NwzSnRY6BK4zN2j 2Ao0dtDg5nfLtI0UfiBKh3/EIVXpHjeMqVc+CCLtDSeMs1QReOAwL61qe3hSEbTkJDnR vYGEhkPe6tqi9TNr4KcBtqeoFFknjC54X+IQxiSJ8+KMXCjcJWCTwrZvbkBpXcaDkmFn 5z3Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2ainO9kOlE+TgMWM44t+1aZfyGCeyxIhy6gCffxJyWE=; b=N/vnE7Ci9kG+nmJGfv06kvG/Q+SjZ9pXB2K4r4kGiceytP9xBOxIHEAsDeSD7rVuBM pAb9L6DeA+bIJw8e2igM4CPpiMY9tDMOPrw6qp4Wpdtjw9o30TAQFPx0rAMREsyPi3Sg FvQExA1ieI/QFfZe/9YEyZJQ2ZQ7oL4OTd8aVOxLuxHUWmiNMRYvR0A6F0Msb3mid5Ya cnLJe8PmAq7HTAHIyy3sssFln938eCzhe1Eibg2Ooh7sK1oORp+YsKP/fPF1JHH4kyM9 dvIRHwSo/1TCvK3QhM38Rl06rgk0q+yMZOVL6+F93208S9+QUAAfDxwvguAG0lTC3nQL +lMg== X-Received: by 10.182.131.166 with SMTP id on6mr42605obb.24.1407368219110; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:36:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.28.97 with SMTP id a1ls428156obh.73.gmail; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.241.227 with SMTP id wl3mr120121obc.7.1407368218636; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:36:57 -0700 (PDT) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <857775fe-c38f-4e84-b3b9-17034a98a989@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1a05ebdb-5a99-4382-b6a3-4205d1d16ae6@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL Corrections MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1808_532082885.1407368217951" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_1808_532082885.1407368217951 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 6:39:51 PM UTC-4, xorxes wrote: > > > You can discuss it here, sure. You can also check if it's something that > has already been detected in: > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/CLL,+aka+Reference+Grammar,+Errata > Thanks! In section 1, Example 1.8, the description says "ke'a can be omitted if it is clear to the listener that it belongs to in some place other than x1." Then the example is "tu poi le mlatu pu lacpu cu ratcu". I see two problems with this. 1) It is very un-lojban like to suggest the listener can just reinterpret the sentence based on subjective "clarity". While I understand that there is always some undertone of subjective/contextual interpretation going on, this case is rather clearly not one of them. Which leads me to the second problem 2) the example literally says "that-distant-thing which dragged the cat, is-a-rat". Not that the cat dragged the rat, which it says it is equivalent to in example 1.5. Also, it's easy enough to fix by adding a `se` before `lacpu`. There isn't any need for ambiguity, and I don't think such even needs to be suggested. HTH .trans. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_1808_532082885.1407368217951 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 6:39:51 PM UTC-4, xorxes wrot= e:

Yo= u can discuss it here, sure. You can also check if it's something that has = already been detected in:

=
Thanks!

In section 1, Example 1.8, the = description says "ke'a can be omitted if it is clear to the listener that i= t belongs to in some place other than x1." Then the example is "tu poi le m= latu pu lacpu cu ratcu". I see two problems with this. 1) It is very un-loj= ban like to suggest the listener can just reinterpret the sentence based on= subjective "clarity". While I understand that there is always some underto= ne of subjective/contextual interpretation going on, this case is rather cl= early not one of them. Which leads me to the second problem 2) the example = literally says "that-distant-thing which dragged the cat, is-a-rat". Not th= at the cat dragged the rat, which it says it is equivalent to in example 1.= 5. Also, it's easy enough to fix by adding a `se` before `lacpu`. There isn= 't any need for ambiguity, and I don't think such even needs to be suggeste= d.

HTH .trans.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_1808_532082885.1407368217951--