Received: from mail-we0-f186.google.com ([74.125.82.186]:35950) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XFGT2-00060t-L1 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:26 -0700 Received: by mail-we0-f186.google.com with SMTP id u56sf326187wes.13 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fTsOPcNyS0h4ZDfbPHBCwlGW2yGNWhnmfNX2vaJxiOo=; b=x6pF0GLoIJmfLbEricfDr+3PEtWUmFmqJPj14sKr3wQKNcpIKZyUHLspuk9gjURXVU LDswJu/YzUK20uPsTvVyIS5xO7fDAet3O63cJyNVHCMAYsTrDqpftl/yU06ZQngVSOVs yni3hzxyB2byk/U6BabjdEINFBRAawuWw+m1P4F9/OhoHlc9ta3sIFcS+Mmtpq5Wnf6V onE6rwFqk4FGRlV/fL7JoOOEOszLBKUQKSb/TcXpZWMR/JKHZiwgbP9L3p9Sdbx+/ZVm 6UdAyICUuBBipchpFE0wUr7fczKW/lKx2FVXLvUN5HucZA2736JL9dqZ8SQYtFL4it6Z RzOw== X-Received: by 10.153.4.37 with SMTP id cb5mr889lad.18.1407390137678; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.43.84 with SMTP id u20ls12978lal.83.gmail; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.0.162 with SMTP id 2mr1755671lbf.3.1407390136759; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x244.google.com (mail-we0-x244.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::244]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hm4si517338wib.3.2014.08.06.22.42.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::244 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::244; Received: by mail-we0-f196.google.com with SMTP id w61so1670853wes.11 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.229 with SMTP id jv5mr21452230wjc.90.1407390136605; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.71.197 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <543519c7-ee91-4ef3-90ed-8198ecf22b0d@googlegroups.com> References: <543519c7-ee91-4ef3-90ed-8198ecf22b0d@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:42:16 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] One end cmavo to rule them all From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::244 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb70b682722ca0500038d0f X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7bb70b682722ca0500038d0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-08-07 5:11 GMT+04:00 TR NS : > Why are there so many "end-whatever" cmavo? We can't close any open > clauses until we've closed that most recent one, correct? So why not just > have one "end current clause" cmavo? > > .trans. > This is mostly true. In my style out of terminators (particles that close constructs) I use mostly {vau}, {li'u} or {le'u} (for closing quotations), {ku} only after modals. So yes, of course, you can use a style where most terminators are not used. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bb70b682722ca0500038d0f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



2014-08-07 5:11 GMT+04:00 TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>:
Why are there so many "end-whatever" cmavo? We c= an't close any open clauses until we've closed that most recent one= , correct? So why not just have one "end current clause" cmavo?
.trans.

This is = mostly true. In my style out of terminators (particles that close construct= s) I use mostly {vau}, {li'u} or {le'u} (for closing quotations), {= ku} only after modals.

So yes, of course, you can use a style where most termi= nators are not used.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bb70b682722ca0500038d0f--