Received: from mail-qc0-f185.google.com ([209.85.216.185]:62684) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XG60W-0001Fg-C0 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:44:25 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f185.google.com with SMTP id r5sf110395qcx.2 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zcIt6Zw0dkcZbdaNRMSVYFaFLxBoCP6shv5UKVqIAkk=; b=rd9XnQwyqEtL+DMfb9lNxy7zwTVG2dL5TmJ1+Q2EPWmV0pqQYkCoIX/D8QnWJz9zfs 9WTF9/3AoaXMcd/MxgOJvoO9OuHgJfLjzDgMeoBWKCDu2KKrTI1+j1Sl7Q5W946pxjjI hNqEtz8hE+jiCqzcf6/s3HYQMZmjmpNhHFCGo+izxjX44PeVtkK2unKvUBkSf8ib8jAl WH/h8VaEbiy+NEYwfoLI0UwoJnfj/9HPsmsW3c4ZV7+NsOfN7DKZ9+xM/AGW25mM418z Mc/O3KII71wop0Av8bxFeLvBl8UsUaGIYjtNeWp6rLY4Uci2DUVooYhGFQeDZ3efbPYB zhjA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zcIt6Zw0dkcZbdaNRMSVYFaFLxBoCP6shv5UKVqIAkk=; b=FhFNEicVukFxJS4yPbYH9iT3DBfx43ZZj8m2RMyUaXUrOlAthhmawpVqRybrFLmWD6 1EmaWdCGBAvjOQXyfpN5YJeZf+fu35q4AzCMhGJdOHJ86I2QybtD5SlUfCeHsQkDIn1w cfY2UDgvbXlYmUtUDzqsa37oytDetpMZeP+dDjD7MBAv6PPdg4Xtzj6Hi+iuK+rNVwJT z2OX/8jru285TZN/P7GG8z1qCwFau5uY2wiw5g4g0gwsWhNobotSIb9YKyYK4UlxNXQg u3s1sMirVgQ0QzanH2D/Pd7ouczn48SUhbPE/AcFE5SllgT1cQnC10/X+/g7BL4vxjEm usCg== X-Received: by 10.140.84.212 with SMTP id l78mr5305qgd.12.1407588257781; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.39.148 with SMTP id v20ls346999qgv.93.gmail; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.102.104 with SMTP id v95mr32992qge.6.1407588257497; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 05:44:17 -0700 (PDT) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <6dba3c27-485e-4c1a-b603-4efae8eda6a1@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20140808011937.GT23392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20131227041501.GA21848@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <2cee2571-a652-48cb-b581-e97177c89074@googlegroups.com> <2d8a397d-0399-4631-a0ee-b16e3c8cddad@googlegroups.com> <20140807062529.GR23392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <450f6fea-1384-44dd-8966-6be903090942@googlegroups.com> <20140808011937.GT23392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: The CLL project, technical directions MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1300_92019966.1407588257211" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_1300_92019966.1407588257211 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thursday, August 7, 2014 9:19:44 PM UTC-4, Robin Powell wrote: > > > So let me start off by saying that pandoc is certainly not out of > the question and you're welcome to try to do something like that. I > played with it myself for a while. > > Would it be possible for me to get a copy of the source material, even just a chapter or two portion, to work with? The background here is that I want a system that basically any > programmer can work with without significant train-up time, because > no matter what I pick it seems like everybody talks about how they > don't want to work with it. Haskell is unusually popular around > here so it's not completely out of the question, but let's face it, > getting up to speed on a Haskell library isn't exactly trivial most > of the time. To use pandoc I would need to be really compelled by > it, and "has no indexing at all" is not how you compel me in to work > on something like the CLL, which has a *VAST* index. > > Ok. > Teaching a system that has no concept of an index whatsoever how to > render one means thoroughly learning a new system that, at the time, > I had no indication that anyone else would be familiar with or be > able to help with. That sounds tedious and upleasent to me, just > because of the time that would be required to learn pandoc. > > In addition to my primary goal being accessibility for other coders > and the specific issue of the index, though, it's not just the > index. > > http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/pandoc_vs_docbook/ > > Look at the HTML, specifically the "I sell this-thing/these-things > to that-buyer/those-buyers." example. I don't know why the tables > align differently; I'd have to go figure that out. The examples > have no numbers. etc, etc, etc; there's a ton of work there > The HTML shouldn't be too hard to fix, at least mostly. I am more concerned about the PDF output though, that a bit harder to fix. > I have no idea how much work it will take to teach pandoc everything > I need to teach it. I have a pretty good idea how long the Ruby > solution will take, though (I'd say on the order of a hundred > hours). > Ok. Well, maybe that is best choice at this time then. I am a (very good) Ruby programmer so I may be able to help a bit there too. But I would like to see how far I can get the Pandoc solution to work. Thing is, I have my own book to publish eventually. So I have an ulterior motive of perfecting a publishing platform for myself as well, and I am absolutely adamant about KISS. Using the LLC as base material for working that out should be perfect b/c it contain many of the same kinds of constructs I will need (examples, tables, index, etc). If I can't get the Pandoc to work, or find something similar, than I may just join your Ruby-platform alliance ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_1300_92019966.1407588257211 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 9:19:44 PM UTC-4, Robin Po= well wrote:

So let me start= off by saying that pandoc is certainly not out of
the question and you're welcome to try to do something like that.  = ;I
played with it myself for a while.


Would it be possible for me to get a c= opy of the source material, even just a chapter or two portion, to work wit= h? 


The background here is that I want a system that basically an= y
programmer can work with without significant train-up time, because
no matter what I pick it seems like everybody talks about how they
don't want to work with it.  Haskell is unusually popular around
here so it's not completely out of the question, but let's face it,
getting up to speed on a Haskell library isn't exactly trivial most
of the time.  To use pandoc I would need to be really compelled by
it, and "has no indexing at all" is not how you compel me in to work
on something like the CLL, which has a *VAST* index.

 
Ok.
 
Teaching a system that has no concept of= an index whatsoever how to
render one means thoroughly learning a new system that, at the time,
I had no indication that anyone else would be familiar with or be
able to help with.  That sounds tedious and upleasent to me, just
because of the time that would be required to learn pandoc.

In addition to my primary goal being accessibility for other coders
and the specific issue of the index, though, it's not just the
index.

http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/pandoc_vs= _docbook/

Look at the HTML, specifically the "I sell this-thing/these-things
to that-buyer/those-buyers." example.  I don't know why the tables
align differently; I'd have to go figure that out.  The examples
have no numbers.  etc, etc, etc; there's a ton of work there

The HTML shouldn't be too hard to fix,= at least mostly. I am more concerned about the PDF output though, that a b= it harder to fix.
 
I have no idea how much work it will take to teach pandoc everyth= ing
I need to teach it.  I have a pretty good idea how long the Ruby
solution will take, though (I'd say on the order of a hundred
hours).

Ok. Well, maybe that is best choice at= this time then. I am a (very good) Ruby programmer so I may be able to hel= p a bit there too.

But I would like to see how far= I can get the Pandoc solution to work. Thing is, I have my own book to pub= lish eventually. So I have an ulterior motive of perfecting a publishing pl= atform for myself as well, and I am absolutely adamant about KISS. Using th= e LLC as base material for working that out should be perfect b/c it contai= n many of the same kinds of constructs I will need (examples, tables, index= , etc). 

If I can't get the Pandoc to work, o= r find something similar, than I may just join your Ruby-platform alliance = ;-)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_1300_92019966.1407588257211--