Received: from mail-ob0-f186.google.com ([209.85.214.186]:34717) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XG6OJ-0001de-4V for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:09:00 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f186.google.com with SMTP id wn1sf1414217obc.3 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jg1YcV3r9CDphvD3KGIBLGs4lHBfzC2/6WHrqMfjoXU=; b=rXyxKaIJ68WlDJoELVmmoBQAtfvQAaIVmoC/VB8ahEJujDtxCZccBdGrWZ7mk7W5+R D3j+C9GqwGGdclZ52CygDbKNvDEVxZnS64rpPO7mOC+TJfT+kbUuC8/zr7VU7/20T6QC bqe/iFHXTSynHZPZbMz8vgov9jQBiYXgrjNWLx1ajsG4BBInD3KlXnKy+ne3BQz76vcI 0e9CgOjWHL8GqgwyX6RPj902QzDEvnn42VuKPbsqNBavl6qKrfsZ7z5gMMSjOIh+8W2A oDPGctJrtcKsxCjFP4mwQEs7+s3OzdLdxkFb/jBBJpfmc+iTuwzWCtsv8J4NF4HaRkSB UmTw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jg1YcV3r9CDphvD3KGIBLGs4lHBfzC2/6WHrqMfjoXU=; b=Q3q5Kyx5mvBbpdUrITvOaknJOB46QXqusT/o0PuIqbVIAOWFba39HGOfFjPA1qppiY DKn9jYx3b0QqZ4OxM/OHTlSHnis+wTt/ULBoRyjwvzhLEBvdH/EAHN6BI7EXnvRNAmF/ KtD23HXhijtT3eYgawKTvU7H/u0aVvY16blZkIcIldYjqhQhm6znqMdQwqOIwpunKuor sp7Fnyua+FFjNPJntrwpghl6QvtnoKhySPH/qXoLqkcplsbIt31YLgUfLxf3eb8K3i7B qxr/RxVXytrnh+5dNfQ4qR7X7txRGD/guynv438JcQoLhi/aQ93QSxrR4y7//y21bqrJ XKOQ== X-Received: by 10.140.84.212 with SMTP id l78mr7770qgd.12.1407589732752; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.50.107 with SMTP id r98ls835507qga.71.gmail; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.20.151 with SMTP id 23mr1597qgj.13.1407589732454; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0700 (PDT) From: TR NS To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <1a05ebdb-5a99-4382-b6a3-4205d1d16ae6@googlegroups.com> <857775fe-c38f-4e84-b3b9-17034a98a989@googlegroups.com> <036a8ae9-4a0b-455c-b014-0b1a97e37d62@googlegroups.com> <20140807124944.GI28465@samsa.fritz.box> <1fa41501-809e-4157-aee4-777215596290@googlegroups.com> <20140807134047.GK28465@samsa.fritz.box> <20140807165332.GL28465@samsa.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [lojban] CLL Corrections MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: transfire@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_55_1248115135.1407589732173" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_55_1248115135.1407589732173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thursday, August 7, 2014 2:26:06 PM UTC-4, tsani wrote: > > Lojban gives you the choice to be precise or vague. That's what's great > about it. If you want to be precise about which place {ke'a} falls into, > then just say {ke'a}. > > .i lo tcadu noi mi ke'a xabju cu barda mutce > The town which I live in is very big. > > But if you want to be vague, just leave it out. It is left up to context > then. > > .i lo cirla noi mi citka cu kukte mutce > The cheese which I am eating is very delicious. > > This is in contrast to English, where you are forced to be precise in > places that you don't always care about (e.g. mandatory verb tense, > mandatory noun number). > > If you look through the usage of Lojban over the past 15 or so years, > you'll see that what I've described is how NOI is used. > > Ah, ok. That at least makes sense. My "gut" sort of revolts at this ambiguity though --I mean there is no way to designate a sumti in a sentence while being ambiguous about exactly which slot it is filling, is there? So it's seems odd to me that one could do that in a subordinate clause. But in any case, at least that explanation makes sense. It would be good if the LLC made that clear --adding your very words, in fact, would have helped me understand that section much better. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_55_1248115135.1407589732173 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, August 7, 2014 2:26:06 PM UTC-4, tsani wr= ote:
Lojban gi= ves you the choice to be precise or vague. That's what's great about it. If= you want to be precise about which place {ke'a} falls into, then just say = {ke'a}.

.i lo tcadu noi mi ke'a xabju cu barda mutce
The town which I live in is very big.

But if you want to be vague, j= ust leave it out. It is left up to context then.

.i lo cirla noi mi = citka cu kukte mutce
The cheese which I am eating is very delicious.

This is in contrast to English, where you are forced to be precise in p= laces that you don't always care about (e.g. mandatory verb tense, mandator= y noun number).

If you look through the usage of Lojban over the pas= t 15 or so years, you'll see that what I've described is how NOI is used.

Ah, ok. That at least makes sens= e.  My "gut" sort of revolts at this ambiguity though --I mean there i= s no way to designate a sumti in a sentence while being ambiguous about exa= ctly which slot it is filling, is there? So it's seems odd to me that one c= ould do that in a subordinate clause. But in any case, at least that explan= ation makes sense. It would be good if the LLC made that clear --adding you= r very words, in fact, would have helped me understand that section much be= tter.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_55_1248115135.1407589732173--