Received: from mail-oa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.219.61]:35509) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XGeMj-0005R0-JH for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:40 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id eb12sf1653409oac.26 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dJcmoa1ks55JTuDK7un6g9C/s0uqcwFSvU6+W6J8ERs=; b=TbXDm1PNkNe4u66ftW0XytN9FNNB6KVg2LrbYFBoTCG57CR5laLyrP7VuUwlzfwqpA oLC7N6MYLgjUzATM1I9i4G1yfHSCy5Zso+TKy9EvFvIeYr6jVwIM6/5wGUjwTkBGdBSM JXJIr3OCUWCrHoBKnMjilLNHoGByEKefta1+nolHEuVnBxu+u5On0D3psVTHmLMPt0+L vf3A1OXXrxcyXiEYtuuOZ8Y+nfvHEw2W3tqH6jHI4QEwgtYWJvmf2gbhnmDo1J8AKH+W IfWnnN7HhNrGKqhF09o1y2qWIpj5YMrTUCd6isMl50rb4Lrq39H1DImFH6InmJhxaXKj jcvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dJcmoa1ks55JTuDK7un6g9C/s0uqcwFSvU6+W6J8ERs=; b=hj5ZO0YVQanIhuTnqzlpsnlkct8OSbMzTT+4iIcqTQeDqmePKsVtE2fn/4fahTviAl qaSQkxtFSPlybLP8ZLfL6VG0HyzC1ftFiD5exij7nb/ufFvJZv6Gp6Pisv+KbcDUEf6u /KRhIwQi5cFGyysxEmGsJXg9K1uheGGVsHG95b+kMjWkzfapJnv/tTGen6HClYy/oPlj 5XWYCFWQHci+BB+2odraKK+HOL4WE1s9enpvg3Pz6AohBh4t4Sf81oszIrdCtsDKNsUO MMeQ6X+CGlOC2279g9W87YQUt3fI7pRtfpabakco8lsi3hDRT2fJ9xoixL5wmFxiIeF2 vJng== X-Received: by 10.182.191.39 with SMTP id gv7mr17994obc.10.1407720330837; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:30 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.45.234 with SMTP id q10ls583619obm.76.gmail; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.130.168 with SMTP id of8mr11489898obb.27.1407720330158; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ha9si248708igb.0.2014.08.10.18.25.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: ross@rossogilvie.id.au does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=209.85.218.52; Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h136so5042847oig.25 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnD64F1XtBpu/pSBBZkuZ07UsrnHSJF4WguccO+Uod02S3W2/s8kNW7K6J2RLe0bMS7cioG X-Received: by 10.60.147.229 with SMTP id tn5mr45844858oeb.11.1407720329352; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:25:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.151.6 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:24:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [129.78.95.84] In-Reply-To: <81ec7c3b-00b5-4bc0-839c-f137bc2c0991@googlegroups.com> References: <543519c7-ee91-4ef3-90ed-8198ecf22b0d@googlegroups.com> <81ec7c3b-00b5-4bc0-839c-f137bc2c0991@googlegroups.com> From: Ross Ogilvie Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:24:59 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] One end cmavo to rule them all To: lojban X-Original-Sender: ross@rossogilvie.id.au X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: ross@rossogilvie.id.au does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=ross@rossogilvie.id.au Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e14a52ca88e0500506e1c X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7b2e14a52ca88e0500506e1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If you want to think seriously about this topic, may I suggest you read http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=Magic_Words_Alternatives and the other magic words link I sent you. How to deal with these sorts of words is a hard problem in Lojban, with lots of corner cases. These documents contain some of the best thinking around. To answer your specific question, having the magic word on the left does make things easier. After binding it would be considered a single word of the desired selma'o. Eg lo barda xaulo si bloti = lo barda bloti. -- Ross On 10 August 2014 03:07, TR NS wrote: > On Friday, August 8, 2014 1:09:50 PM UTC-4, Latro wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:00 AM, TR NS wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, thinking about the use case you describe, it occurs to me that it >>> would be much easier to remember a single cmavo that worked in conjunction >>> with the opening cmavo, e.g. `ke melbri nixli kexo ckule` instead of `ke >>> melbri nixli ke'e ckule` where `xo` is some cmavo that means "close the >>> cmavo I just mentioned". >>> >> "Selma'o cast" type cmavo, which is really what you are suggesting (it >> casts LE to KU, NOI to KUhO, etc.) are generally difficult to formalize. >> This is a big part of why mekso is such a big mess. (Another is just YACC >> parser limitations, some of which have not been corrected in the >> semi-official PEG or even the zasni gerna). >> >> Going into some details, let's call your cmavo {xau} for discussion ({xo} >> is taken). {vau} and arguably {boi} do not match your paradigm. {le'u} >> looks like it should, but it really doesn't, because if {lo'u xau} >> terminates {lo'u} then you can't quote {lo'u xau} to explain what it means. >> (By contrast, you can quote {le'u} using {zo} and can quote {zo} using >> {lo'u}/{le'u}, which means there is syntax available for defining these in >> Lojban.) The interaction with {lu} would be intelligible but >> counterintuitive and possibly not formalizable: {lu ... lu xau} appears to >> start a second quote and then, doesn't. And finally you would need to >> specify how exactly {xau} interacts with {si} (is {ke xau} one word or >> two?). Everything else would probably work out. >> >> > Good point about quotations. Just leaving quotes out of this seems better, > so no {lo'u}, and even if strictly possible, not {le'u} or {lu} either. > Your point about {lu} made we wonder though. What about {xau lu} versus {lu > xau}? Would having {xau} go first make things more intelligible, and can > that work grammatically? Not sure about {si} but I think probably one, b/c > it is probably better to repeat the whole thing if need be. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b2e14a52ca88e0500506e1c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If you want to think seriously about this topic,= may I suggest you read http://mw.lojban.org/index.php?title=3DMagic_Words= _Alternatives and the other magic words link I sent you. How to deal wi= th these sorts of words is a hard problem in Lojban, with lots of corner ca= ses. These documents contain some of the best thinking around.

To answer your specific question, having the magic word on the le= ft does make things easier. After binding it would be considered a single w= ord of the desired selma'o. Eg lo barda xaulo si bloti =3D lo barda blo= ti.

-- Ross


On 10 August 2014 03:07, TR NS <transfire@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
On Friday, August 8, 2014 1= :09:50 PM UTC-4, Latro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:0= 0 AM, TR NS <tran...@gmail.com> wrote= :

Also, thinking about the use case you = describe, it occurs to me that it would be much easier to remember a single= cmavo that worked in conjunction with the opening cmavo, e.g. `ke melbri n= ixli kexo ckule` instead of `ke melbri nixli ke'e ckule` where `xo` is = some cmavo that means "close the cmavo I just mentioned".
"Selma'o cast" type cmavo, which is = really what you are suggesting (it casts LE to KU, NOI to KUhO, etc.) are g= enerally difficult to formalize. This is a big part of why mekso is such a = big mess. (Another is just YACC parser limitations, some of which have not = been corrected in the semi-official PEG or even the zasni gerna).

Going into some details, let's call your cmavo {xau} for discussion= ({xo} is taken). {vau} and arguably {boi} do not match your paradigm. {le&= #39;u} looks like it should, but it really doesn't, because if {lo'= u xau} terminates {lo'u} then you can't quote {lo'u xau} to exp= lain what it means. (By contrast, you can quote {le'u} using {zo} and c= an quote {zo} using {lo'u}/{le'u}, which means there is syntax avai= lable for defining these in Lojban.) The interaction with {lu} would be int= elligible but counterintuitive and possibly not formalizable: {lu ... lu xa= u} appears to start a second quote and then, doesn't. And finally you w= ould need to specify how exactly {xau} interacts with {si} (is {ke xau} one= word or two?). Everything else would probably work out.


Good poin= t about quotations. Just leaving quotes out of this seems better, so no {lo= 'u}, and even if strictly possible, not {le'u} or {lu} either. Your= point about {lu} made we wonder though. What about {xau lu} versus {lu xau= }? Would having {xau} go first make things more intelligible, and can that = work grammatically? Not sure about {si} but I think probably one, b/c it is= probably better to repeat the whole thing if need be.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b2e14a52ca88e0500506e1c--