Received: from mail-qc0-f192.google.com ([209.85.216.192]:43406) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XKtlP-0000sI-Qg for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:40 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f192.google.com with SMTP id m20sf2527808qcx.19 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4QADUvk2qvPPKvCiWhtNnph+9ZKMhUKBO7r9RW8Dy/s=; b=I8lhktoN9g2wuihzsbZfBwkU0Cnle4Zj0sf8ypqRpU/zKcPA3lZUO5Azhw6EcsokIp NI9EB5aSkYP3mcApIBZoOpvTiV2tyDEYUC2gBuwgWMZoDzohSg2UcZrCIBteVSfzS0Bh zB6ohWNTzvjxM4rLDaimgX73yy0Zoiv+KSIPkGlqHazkbUsd5O5mkDDJBo8cUqw2btVW 8IdURVOmdihM2EBRUVoVDTpWCJb3hzTBC1MNbp8z1WN82dLSJLEitMX8T7gWLetZ1P44 KY5Gmr2tAs14SB15EzyQ3bvTXF62L05HYs16wxEEiVoWcEspaiDH46oazG4G/KS/rZmU nwFg== X-Received: by 10.50.29.13 with SMTP id f13mr9439igh.15.1408732833419; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.221.99 with SMTP id qd3ls65016igc.40.gmail; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.147.227 with SMTP id tn3mr4519641pab.4.1408732833078; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net. [68.230.241.215]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cj6si5687004qcb.1.2014.08.22.11.40.32 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:40:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=68.230.241.215; Received: from eastrmimpo210 ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20140822184032.RNBX31158.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo210> for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:40:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo210 with cox id hugY1o00K1LDWBL01ugYGX; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:40:32 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.53F78EA0.011D,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aZC/a2Ut c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=BGi6d-X4uLYA:10 a=OCvT583evUAA:10 a=LZqkEVnAdAkA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=Zvvn6FG-k4MvJElTZTIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <53F78EA2.2010405@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:40:34 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Revitalizing LLG: Suggestions for the 2014 annual meeting References: <53F3A68F.2050207@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - On 8/22/2014 6:54 AM, mukti wrote: > In my last message, I proposed measures for increasing transparency of > LLG, clarifying its commitments, and removing the obstacles to > officially documenting contemporary lojban. I'd like to add another > goal: Bringing official policy up to date with practice and the > intentions of the community. > > To these ends, I'd like to work with others, particularly LLG members or > prospective members, on continuing the development of actionable > proposals to be presented for consideration at the 2014 annual meeting. If the proposal requires a bylaw amendment, have the actual text of the proposed amendment ready when I call for agenda items for the meeting. Otherwise, the procedure for making bylaw amendments is itself difficult. I don't think that the 2002 document is outdated or that it really changed the 1997 statement significantly. Robin's later pronouncements really amount to his current policy as jatna, and thus is on a lower level than the 2002 policy. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.