Received: from mail-wi0-f184.google.com ([209.85.212.184]:38840) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XKu7V-00017E-1X for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:30 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f184.google.com with SMTP id n3sf10601wiv.21 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DfviB2Z+TIQQqKz6WQw9UIh9JkUy4wQ5oQAux0V1fPk=; b=xNzj6UW9mnBa5MATk7igo8ys9Bt5dYZ/1i9RTlfcI4/BLKw0XvKqOwwkiI6kUsXCnG gCMSL+nd2fzOZn7B45ecv8MJqS8/CXVVEnbKK/Pci0w8NSh8R9E/d/FDJvekcGTiJNG9 blwqkXLWWGuF3YItV729ngPnOJvPBNICJXW2VzZeynFSmENjLa4D7ih9lKDPvlEkAwXR aHUlOrvw7CjBcGPbt1aabizUTTIDKFKdX1e8cuqwAuC8A21AZrXk9u5KdHsT7wkLAT1J GfKP+HTNzfuzso6s1tgfvKcgO6+9ICN1A2RQ3qHcqYCpoW9fLE0n2OZ2MR4eMKb8MQre /Fiw== X-Received: by 10.152.87.173 with SMTP id az13mr17342lab.37.1408734202142; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.153.11.138 with SMTP id ei10ls275574lad.23.gmail; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.157.231 with SMTP id wp7mr635112lbb.1.1408734201454; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x243.google.com (mail-we0-x243.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::243]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ec6si15145wib.3.2014.08.22.12.03.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::243 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::243; Received: by mail-we0-f195.google.com with SMTP id p10so3655677wes.6 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.205.70 with SMTP id le6mr6825964wjc.25.1408734201343; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.142.148 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53F79061.5000706@lojban.org> References: <53F79061.5000706@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:03:21 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Revitalizing LLG: Suggestions for the 2014 annual meeting From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::243 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb039a6a7767505013c7d75 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7bb039a6a7767505013c7d75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-08-22 22:48 GMT+04:00 Robert LeChevalier : > On 8/22/2014 12:47 PM, selpa'i wrote: > >> In the 2003 annual meeting there was a movement to make Lojban the >> language used during LLG meetings. It failed, but maybe something >> similar could be considered again. Perhaps a certain percentage of the >> discussions should be in Lojban, if 100% is not feasible yet. A "Lojban >> Quota" so to speak. Opinions? >> >> mi'e la selpa'i mu'o >> > > A couple years ago, I started the meeting with a Lojban sentence, and was > basically told that people no longer wanted to do this. > > The original idea was when we were holding meetings on IRC, and the plan > was to have people on a back channel translating and explaining things in > real time. the actual meeting would be in Lojban, but the process of > getting things into Lojban would have been greatly assisted, for those with > insufficient real time skill. > > That type of language learning, where a group of learners is attempting to > communicate in-language, each assisted by a coach that would help them find > the words and modes of expression they need, has been used to achieve rapid > fluency in other languages, but it is very intense, and hence hard to > imagine working over the several weeks of the current meetings. > > I'd love to see it tried sometime on IRC to have a large group discussion > with coaching. > If we are talking about the LLG meetings in a mailing list then using Lojban and only Lojban is a *must*. Is this a huge problem for anyone of using Lojban? If yes then may be this person should go to lojban-beginners or lojban mailing list first? So I suggest using only Lojban for any official documents. I also suggest translating existing documents into a code with members of the LLG (or at least by le jatna) signing them as official ones. Official documents initially written in Lojban can be translated to English later. The only exclusion can be done when explaining the translation of particular features of Lojban grammar in other languages but this is more about teaching Lojban or about comparative linguistics. > > lojbab > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bb039a6a7767505013c7d75 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



2014-08-22 22:48 GMT+04:00 Robert LeChevalier <= ;lojbab@lojban.org>:
On 8/22/2014 12:47 PM, selpa= 'i wrote:
In the 2003 annual meeting there was a movement to make Lojban the
language used during LLG meetings. It failed, but maybe something
similar could be considered again. Perhaps a certain percentage of the
discussions should be in Lojban, if 100% is not feasible yet. A "Lojba= n
Quota" so to speak. Opinions?

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

A couple years ago, I started the meeting with a Lojban sentence, and was b= asically told that people no longer wanted to do this.

The original idea was when we were holding meetings on IRC, and the plan wa= s to have people on a back channel translating and explaining things in rea= l time.=C2=A0 the actual meeting would be in Lojban, but the process of get= ting things into Lojban would have been greatly assisted, for those with in= sufficient real time skill.

That type of language learning, where a group of learners is attempting to = communicate in-language, each assisted by a coach that would help them find= the words and modes of expression they need, has been used to achieve rapi= d fluency in other languages, but it is very intense, and hence hard to ima= gine working over the several weeks of the current meetings.

I'd love to see it tried sometime on IRC to have a large group discussi= on with coaching.

If we are talking abo= ut the LLG meetings in a mailing list then using Lojban and only Lojban is = a must. Is this a huge problem for anyone of using Lojban? If yes th= en may be this person should go to lojban-beginners or lojban mailing list = first?
So I suggest using only Lojban for any official documents.
I= also suggest translating existing documents into a code with members of th= e LLG (or at least by le jatna) signing them as official ones.

Official documents initially written in Lojban can be transl= ated to English later.

The only exclusion can be d= one when explaining the translation of particular features of Lojban gramma= r in other languages but this is more about teaching Lojban or about compar= ative linguistics.


=C2=A0

lojbab

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bb039a6a7767505013c7d75--