Received: from mail-we0-f190.google.com ([74.125.82.190]:50245)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDUNF3UDXIJBBNPXTSQAKGQE56RJFRA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1XPD1Z-0005W0-Hf
	for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:03:12 -0700
Received: by mail-we0-f190.google.com with SMTP id w61sf912881wes.27
        for <lojban-list-archive@lojban.org>; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=SgqTt9oXDZMSKy1RxIWiYGMnQAfFah61eUqq5EgRee0=;
        b=bfF+1wLe1aZkNdQVKfiSvdR73Pb+ntQfAm9vwj05uwgfT9cL4UJItIHWMfQQka6q59
         dS2T1xhaYUofbO7R9SKB7gOKTsoUI4/yRhrsRrfn7jo0WW7I8Vm9DoM9AazyF+nmlIuY
         pHHNG5mmT283rC2Bfj07MQRcdb4ASpnuMSqQcdHMMkpIQx0dKVa8LFw3YB3ty6CjptOa
         MrNKcTuVAZuCZW3dLsXTwl/wj5oJ/tuDE5btLVTXffbuRXy+sUKzNkBK/SIZ1UOA220m
         P9RFKLFDG+tIA3/KTsdRS1+uZLX8u3zmcy4OVxbx9eUDYmUWfmmAIjEhpZyzvz7w00g7
         uoNg==
X-Received: by 10.152.20.195 with SMTP id p3mr530676lae.1.1409760182496;
        Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.152.36.66 with SMTP id o2ls362716laj.8.gmail; Wed, 03 Sep 2014
 09:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.44.227 with SMTP id h3mr2618210lam.2.1409760181489;
        Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dd12116.kasserver.com (dd12116.kasserver.com. [85.13.134.113])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pw5si1342078lbb.0.2014.09.03.09.03.01
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: me@v4hn.de does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=85.13.134.113;
Received: from samsa (brln-4dbc2a6e.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.42.110])
	by dd12116.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0FFF024C0432
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Wed,  3 Sep 2014 18:02:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:02:58 +0200
From: v4hn <me@v4hn.de>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: criticism of lojban needed
Message-ID: <20140903160258.GH585@samsa.fritz.box>
References: <CAO7bV+gzuMQacgo6dwYAhyUd1NEVv-6Up2uC=j=XFGvx+bU+QA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5eccb6c5-6904-4b30-a49c-455e9bb1d32a@googlegroups.com>
 <5406CBB8.20305@gmail.com>
 <1409759095.40258.YahooMailNeo@web181102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1409759095.40258.YahooMailNeo@web181102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Original-Sender: me@v4hn.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: me@v4hn.de does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=me@v4hn.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:44:55AM -0700, 'John E Clifford' via lojban wrote:
> Let's see how that line of objections, rather than ones to the cosmetics, can be met and turned into a positive discussion of Lojban.

I'm sorry, I might have missed something here,
but "It's all crap and anyone could do better" is no valid criticism pe'i


mu'o

--jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=gBMg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh--