Received-SPF: none (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.94.73.24;
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 00:44:23 -0400
From: Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>
To: jboste <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] unquantified sumti with restrictive relative clauses in xorlo
Message-ID: <20140904044423.GB29601@gonzales>
References: <20140904043953.GA29601@gonzales>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140904043953.GA29601@gonzales>
X-cunselcu'a-valsi: ku'a
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
X-Original-Sender: mbays@sdf.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: mbays@sdf.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=mbays@sdf.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -


--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Thursday, 2014-09-04 at 00:39 -0400 - Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>:

> (v) Something along the lines of (iv), but more in line with plural logic /
>     mereology, perhaps by requiring the obvious maximality condition, i.e.
>     ko'a poi broda ->
>         zo'e noi ge ge me ko'a gi broda gi ro da poi ge ge ke'a xi re me ke'a gi
>         ke'a me ko'a gi ke'a broda cu du ke'a
>     , perhaps making it an error if there is no unique such maximum, or
>     perhaps taking all the maxima together (i.e. taking the join).

Oops, lost the ro'oi when parse checking. That should have been:
         zo'e noi ge ge me ko'a gi broda gi ro'oi da poi ge ge ke'a xi re me ke'a gi
         ke'a me ko'a gi ke'a broda cu du ke'a

--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlQH7icACgkQULC7OLX7LNZAmwCfWmXbUImkYrAE0qjQFALwVZDq
lccAmwec31t7k+DjQ9sMCHydJWneRkUP
=zQLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1--