Received: from mail-oi0-f63.google.com ([209.85.218.63]:57743) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XPdmj-0001HW-S2 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:38 -0700 Received: by mail-oi0-f63.google.com with SMTP id g201sf2220876oib.8 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=AhQzoHVPh17XwJygY8BBAKWh+N8ALSLKznthoC9agyo=; b=wOaKlyI7XhSCAG+l9RZYectO+VSOHRtClG6f3Osoe2v987Tpli/CG3UmMuCu87Sz7e xkhuIvv8Sw3pMFuuD3MQlqtU+emYm7EEhmf8o0ACfKd5QBYGI7ZdPPCp/nvgFhZRtnlZ /vJZdsdbE2ab1Mz/iRCGOyKf6PRKY4avL15gGvZ5iLh6ZBHw16RnfvDusf5WIjWQEeKk R5KQ+4ef6DoRAVGTvx6wb9pz24M8+THRVsGI+NwW75VZbTUw6IsWyAxx6LNcZ1BvDd+1 7U/ssZ7cVogGsl9TDMbxzazguv9im846las8i4C4PexJlQujnS64l4gblQkJ4UQhGRtn qmhw== X-Received: by 10.140.37.227 with SMTP id r90mr84194qgr.13.1409863050754; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.27.242 with SMTP id 105ls473415qgx.17.gmail; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.67.135 with SMTP id r7mr3959247qai.5.1409863050352; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7si32668qcm.2.2014.09.04.13.37.30 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234; Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c9so11099943qcz.39 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.129.201 with SMTP id p9mr11063826qas.75.1409863050236; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.201.74 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6a886330-7e72-4b50-ba11-54878f241243@googlegroups.com> References: <6a886330-7e72-4b50-ba11-54878f241243@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:37:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Why left-grouping of tanru? From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: Mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2cc0a4a9cfa05024352e9 X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin invocation failed --001a11c2cc0a4a9cfa05024352e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ah, but the paper that you cite is about Adjectival hierarchies (something I've noticed decades ago, and also wondered about, ever since I saw a sign written by someone who was obviously not a native speaker because of the misordering of adjectives. Glad to see stuff written about it). This is not about grouping at all. Quite the contrary. The examples given in the paper are, almost without exception, about the order of adjectives that are all at the same level (that is, modifying the noun), and not their grouping. e.g. "a small green bottle" (lo cmalu je crino botpi) and "a vegetarian Russian lawyer" (lo nalre'ucti je rusko fladju) What associative grouping is really talking about is precisely the examples I did give, which you dismissed as words that we might hyphenate or adverbs. But that is precisely the point. Because remember, since we don't have in lojban the traditional parts of speech of noun, verb, adjective, and adverb, what brivla function like can only be determined by their position in a bridi or clause. "broda brode" in isolation is the equivalent of either a noun adjunct or an adjective modifying a noun, or an adverbs modifying a verb (which in English is usually the other order) . "broda brode brodi", otoh, is either adverb adjective noun (dull gray house, frighteningly fast ride), (adjective/noun adjunct-noun) noun (stretch limo driver) or adverb adverb verb (very surprisingly caught), the latter construction not appearing often in English, and in those constructions, English is left grouping just like lojban. Contrariwise, constructionslike the ones you cited, adjective adjective noun, don't really group at all (usually). They are "adj. AND adj. noun". (otoh, verb adverb adverb constructions in English, DO right group (run really quickly) --gejyspa On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:50 PM, TR NS wrote: > On Thursday, September 4, 2014 3:03:09 PM UTC-4, gejyspa wrote: >> >> There are plenty of left groupings in English: >> >> newspaper editor strike >> electric light socket >> bass guitar player >> first base umpire >> television series director >> very fast typist >> >> etc etc >> The fact that you happened to picked examples that right grouping (and >> btw, bright yellow star is LEFT grouping, not right. The color is bright >> yellow) >> is jsut from your own biases.... :-) >> --gejyspa, >> >> > I don't think so. First "bright yellow star" could mean "bright yellow" > but more likely it means "bright star that is yellow". I think there is > something important to notice about most of your examples. The first two > words are very close to something we might hyphenate. ("very fast" is the > clear exception, but very is an adverb.) And that goes to my point. It > makes more sense if there where a word for this hyphenation. And we kind of > already have that actually in `bo`. In these cases it would make more sense > to have to use `bo` than it does for my cases. > > Also this isn't just my bias. Although it is hard for me to speak for any > language beyond English, but there are known patterns from which I am > drawing my opinion. See http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/25/paper1473.pdf > for example. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c2cc0a4a9cfa05024352e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0 Ah, but the paper that you cite is about Adjectival= hierarchies (something I've noticed decades ago, and also wondered abo= ut, ever since I saw a sign written by someone who was obviously not a nati= ve speaker because of the misordering of adjectives. =C2=A0Glad to see stuf= f written about it). =C2=A0This is not about grouping at all. =C2=A0Quite t= he contrary. =C2=A0The examples given in the paper are, almost without exce= ption, about the order of adjectives that are all at the same level (that i= s, modifying the noun), and not their grouping. e.g. "a small green bo= ttle" (lo cmalu je crino botpi) and "a vegetarian Russian lawyer&= quot; (lo nalre'ucti je rusko fladju) =C2=A0What associative grouping i= s really talking about is precisely the examples I did give, which you dism= issed as words that we might hyphenate or adverbs. =C2=A0But that is precis= ely the point. =C2=A0Because remember, since we don't have in lojban th= e traditional parts of speech =C2=A0of noun, verb, adjective, and adverb, w= hat brivla =C2=A0function like can only be determined by their position in = a bridi or clause. =C2=A0"broda brode" in isolation is the equiva= lent of either a noun adjunct or an adjective modifying a noun, or an adver= bs modifying a verb (which in English is usually the other order) . "b= roda brode brodi", otoh, is either adverb adjective noun (dull gray ho= use, frighteningly fast ride), (adjective/noun adjunct-noun) =C2=A0noun (st= retch limo driver) or adverb adverb verb (very surprisingly caught), the la= tter construction not appearing often in English, and in those construction= s, English is left grouping just like lojban. =C2=A0Contrariwise, construct= ionslike the ones you cited, adjective adjective noun, don't really gro= up at all (usually). =C2=A0They are "adj. AND adj. noun". (otoh, = verb adverb adverb constructions in English, DO right group (run really qui= ckly)

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --gejyspa



On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:50= PM, TR NS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday= , September 4, 2014 3:03:09 PM UTC-4, gejyspa wrote:
=C2=A0 There are plenty of left groupings in English:
=
=C2=A0 newspaper editor strike
=C2=A0 electric lig= ht socket
=C2=A0 bass guitar player
=C2=A0 first base u= mpire
=C2=A0 television series director
=C2=A0 very fast typist

=C2=A0 etc etc
<= div>=C2=A0 The fact that you happened to picked examples that right groupin= g (and btw, bright yellow star is LEFT grouping, not right. =C2=A0The color= is bright yellow)
is jsut from your own biases.... =C2=A0:-)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --gejyspa,=C2=A0


I=C2=A0don't think so. First "brig= ht yellow star" could mean "bright yellow" but more likely i= t means "bright star that is yellow". I think there is something = important to notice about most of your examples. The first two words are ve= ry close to something we might hyphenate. ("very fast" is the cle= ar exception, but very is an adverb.) And that goes to my point. It makes m= ore sense if there where a word for this hyphenation. And we kind of alread= y have that actually in `bo`. In these cases it would make more sense to ha= ve to use `bo` than it does for my cases.

Also this isn't just my bias. Although it is hard f= or me to speak for any language beyond English, but there are known pattern= s from which I am drawing my opinion. See=C2=A0http://www.lingref.com/= cpp/wccfl/25/paper1473.pdf for example.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c2cc0a4a9cfa05024352e9--