Received: from mail-yk0-f183.google.com ([209.85.160.183]:48050) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XPhB2-0002T5-G3 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:57 -0700 Received: by mail-yk0-f183.google.com with SMTP id 131sf2300846ykp.0 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=NvVm0jzspi2j5ZbUcLfSouER7jrYGt2do/S4S61TFxw=; b=eujaw0WidLxsd9sTtvgUez/v4SVfgCYA0sOEoVS8qUUMSXjLs9zz50v2oDT7izv6hR J1m9lxTlzKW6X32bEsKMdQaAAXqbc6UglQuJR6ofnf2zvg8KHy2hcrxKU5Jad8AwKlIY s1QZQ+lwmKEAUfqCHMQlQNfee0A3i+GTRaRD86dzVWYjcnJb51Dpxy9CS9IizF+yKyFZ yEPdKXTuNTowo+3jBUU0NCT3LRKNN9YyeMvnIW9GDLmmArtvEGFLE4WNMIuLQ4VEYITt Ji7qmesZVj8U50fZjjAQOcoCm71SaVurn1nt4Vntk2KDUmu87wHC3CTZMxXfYNFAEkOO yY0Q== X-Received: by 10.182.246.69 with SMTP id xu5mr61831obc.9.1409876089678; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.138.41 with SMTP id qn9ls187794obb.97.gmail; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.111.170 with SMTP id ij10mr4495527obb.6.1409876088924; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net. [68.230.241.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ld1si147294qcb.3.2014.09.04.17.14.48 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 17:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=68.230.241.214; Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20140905001448.QPER24978.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo109> for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:14:48 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo109 with cox id nCEn1o00Z1LDWBL01CEndh; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:14:48 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.54090078.001B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Y70mRGiN c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=BGi6d-X4uLYA:10 a=WRnIRKy5cnwA:10 a=tCj7_dzuD0sA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=YpSNzqJqDfoD2RDKMbMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <54090077.7050803@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:14:47 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Why left-grouping of tanru? References: In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - On 9/4/2014 10:58 AM, TR NS wrote: > Was wondering why "left-grouping rule" was chosen as the default for tanru? > > I ran though random examples of using two adjectives in my head and they > are almost always right-grouping. "big red truck", "bright yellow star", > "little lost ant", there are exceptions, like "dark roast coffee", but > even then the right-grouping would be okay. But in the other examples > left-grouping would be just flat wrong. The short answer is that Lojban has that default because TLI Loglan had that default, and we weren't trying to change anything without a good reason. Why that default for Loglan? John Clifford may know for certain, since he predates nearly everyone living in his work on the language, but my wife believes that the reason is that mathematical grouping defaults to left grouping for the same operator, and also that left grouping is easiest to parse as you go along. But JCB did attempt to analyze all possible groupings to ensure that all were well-representable in Loglan (his attempts were incomplete, since he had only 16 of the 24 possible groupings, but the complete set was eventually worked out. IIRC, John was actively involved in that solution.) The problem was called the "pretty little girls school" (PLGS) problem because there are ways to read that phrase that invoke most or all of the possible groupings. In the Lojban design era, we extended the analysis to longer strings (eventually "pretty little girls school house door knob") with much more convoluted possibilities, but I doubt that any documentation remains of that analysis. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.