Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:41542) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XPyxQ-0001un-6K for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:14:05 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id w7sf2586884qcr.6 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=nq9+DaGcKRvpttvzJ3nBnJN6A/u/Jzg6N/D8DMACiME=; b=ePI+bVZpHYosFCv6N+pIyJAcNrBizwHoVizmZg04qB4EdUe9e2Lfd/V34bB24uC8pH q8sjJXZ9IN+JxQx+ENyKY6BY5LyeEUF+1E35qVo07wBv0iSULSyNsizHEoAGVjRUYNVd S35cgZHbLZ9kQM3rUHtgQjjdARVIG6AJ+VuIiWHe5GbHdKSILD8QBLIUGYWcwbSZhkC/ af2S8X08dvkSZg/SC5RfAqSqithK0by0R4z0XnAJXXkuUKS6Rad8l4cxQIJM+gQxtPIy R+9XxjxbUi8DKZNLxQtlEWNMn3al+HBY4/R1zkO4U8cKuV5kAo3xIeUzCKHNWIhxd1Hu l3uA== X-Received: by 10.140.93.181 with SMTP id d50mr313067qge.0.1409944437588; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.18.193 with SMTP id 59ls959103qgf.7.gmail; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.143.2 with SMTP id k2mr7877630yhj.18.1409944437173; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ld1si269791qcb.3.2014.09.05.12.13.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232; Received: by mail-qg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id q108so11997417qgd.37 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.36.4 with SMTP id r4mr21361839qad.69.1409944436949; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 12:13:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.159.211 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:13:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:13:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] a modest suggestion -- nubu/kabu To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015372805149b70502564539 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e015372805149b70502564539 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Now that you've explained it, just use it and see what happens. stevo On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > A subject that comes up from time to time is ambiguity with implicit > BY prosumti, especially when they interact with abstractors. Now, > according to CLL 7.5.8: > >> The main difference between letter pro-sumti and ko'a-series >> pro-sumti is that, in the absence of an explicit assignment, letters are >> taken to refer to the most recent name or description sumti beginning with >> the same letter > > > And similarly in 17.9.2: > >> If no assignment can be found for a lerfu string (especially a single >> lerfu word), it can be assumed to refer to the most recent sumti whose name >> or description begins in Lojban with that lerfu > > That's all very well and good, but questions come up from time to time > about what letter to use for an abstraction sumti. Some suggest counting > the NU that marks the start of the structure, others suggest using the > first letter of the internal bridi. This poses two problems. First, > consider the following: > > la normyn prami lo nu limna i la dorys nelci ny > > Does Doris like Norman, or does she like swimming? It depends on which > one of the above approaches the author uses (the first approach also has > the unenviable problem of having a multiplicity of "ny" and "ky" used for > events and properties, and their concomitant unavailability for plain > vanilla sumti (at least for implicit assignment).) > > The second problem is what do you do with an example like this: > > la normyn nelci lo nu la rovr noi gerku cu limna ? > > The first camp would have no problem talking about the abstraction sumti > with an implicit BY "It's ny," they declare. But what would the second > camp call it? They can't use ny, that's Norman to them. They can't use > "ry", that's Rover himself. "ly"? Maybe, but it seems a stretch. They > would pretty much be forced to use explicit goi assignment, ri/ra/ru, se > go'i/go'e/go'a, or the like/ > > > Proposed solution: > > New symbols, nubu, kabu (and the rest of the NUbu family) that refer, > and can refer ONLY to the abstraction. "But if they are a letter/symbol, > what do they look like?" you ask. That's the beauty of lojban. It > doesn't matter, Because we are talking here only about using them as > evaluatable symbols, to refer to sumti, which any lerfu can do. > > This breaks absolutely none of the current grammar, but I think would > make discourse clearer and cleaner. > > What do people think? > > --gejyspa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e015372805149b70502564539 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Now that you've explained it, just use it and see what h= appens.=C2=A0

stevo

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Michael Turnia= nsky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 A sub= ject that comes up from time to time is ambiguity with implicit BY prosumti= , especially when they interact with abstractors. =C2=A0Now, according to C= LL 7.5.8:
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0The = main difference between letter pro-sumti and ko'a-series pro-sumti is t= hat, in the absence of an explicit assignment, letters are taken to refer t= o the most recent name or description sumti beginning with the same letter<= /blockquote>
=C2=A0=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0And similarly in 17.9.= 2:
=C2=A0 If no assignment can be found for a lerf= u string (especially a single lerfu word), it can be assumed to refer to= the most recent sumti whose name or description begins in Lojban with t= hat lerfu
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 That's all very well and good,= but questions come up from time to time about what letter to use for an ab= straction sumti. =C2=A0Some suggest counting the NU that marks the start of= the structure, others suggest using the first letter of the internal bridi= . =C2=A0This poses two problems. =C2=A0First, consider the following:
=

=C2=A0la normyn prami lo nu limna i la dorys nelci ny

=C2=A0 Does Doris like Norman, or does she like swi= mming? =C2=A0It depends on which one of the above approaches the author use= s (the first approach also has the unenviable problem of having a multiplic= ity of "ny" and "ky" used for events and properties, an= d their concomitant unavailability for plain vanilla sumti (at least for im= plicit assignment).)

=C2=A0 The second problem is = what do you do with an example like this:

=C2=A0 = =C2=A0la normyn nelci lo nu la rovr noi gerku cu limna =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0?

=C2=A0 The first camp would have no probl= em talking about the abstraction sumti with an implicit BY "It's n= y," they declare. =C2=A0But what would the second camp call it? =C2=A0= They can't use ny, that's Norman to them. =C2=A0They can't use = "ry", that's Rover himself. =C2=A0"ly"? =C2=A0Maybe= , but it seems a stretch. =C2=A0They would pretty much be forced to use exp= licit goi assignment, ri/ra/ru, se go'i/go'e/go'a, or the like/=


=C2=A0 Proposed solution:

=C2=A0 New symbols, nubu, kabu (and the rest of the NUbu f= amily) that refer, and can refer ONLY =C2=A0to the abstraction. =C2=A0"= ;But if they are a letter/symbol, what do they look like?" you ask. = =C2=A0 That's the beauty of lojban. =C2=A0It doesn't matter, =C2=A0= Because we are talking here only about using them as evaluatable symbols, t= o refer to sumti, which any lerfu can do.

=C2=A0 T= his breaks absolutely none of the current grammar, but I think would make d= iscourse clearer and cleaner. =C2=A0

=C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0What do people think?

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0--gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e015372805149b70502564539--