Received: from mail-ig0-f185.google.com ([209.85.213.185]:64177) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XQ1ea-000390-Ml for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:49 -0700 Received: by mail-ig0-f185.google.com with SMTP id h3sf2549518igd.22 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=references:message-id:date:from:reply-to:subject:to:in-reply-to :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=OiNtFIYYx1SaO3yXph4fEoe1m0Z/KJQf8ZaodjTye5g=; b=K5GIIzDlKQ1hCeV/rCzdhaf583q5ooEF+4VkDF9UIDWGMlZgNauUSkjh1Xc+Y1Ckd7 WePefEqR5E1e0fh0Z3l6ejR9u8VCpGvVSj1J2TO5LKl6M4A4Ur0xOLF6uGWLaJLHtYUr /3Lt6BdFrBw6beq2cjZNaqIGRSFHOBErdUKrrgAyuBAEhyR4ddi56H+oTICRUgeXcm8w 4BJAoB2YotSeSKCPlSU/z/0OaNN+Y5eEy296A6U/N/nVdCYBH36gYM0M9pD3WDiDgeq0 S0Ou6rTTqCiyhoqjFUvqpfMaDlOGWNrNN8Lrcg9dP/qVztvNTQKepA1eNyAb3lRQ35HI xm9A== X-Received: by 10.140.94.34 with SMTP id f31mr74074qge.11.1409954802101; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.18.193 with SMTP id 59ls1014138qgf.7.gmail; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.133.230 with SMTP id q66mr8608042yhi.36.1409954801750; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm7-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm7-vm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com. [216.39.63.95]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bb4si444877pdb.1.2014.09.05.15.06.41 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 216.39.63.95 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.39.63.95; Received: from [216.39.60.176] by nm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Sep 2014 22:06:41 -0000 Received: from [216.39.60.249] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Sep 2014 22:06:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1020.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Sep 2014 22:06:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 502645.92755.bm@omp1020.access.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 47238 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Sep 2014 22:06:41 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: waVkwL4VM1mhVRwusggsN6fatVBbOzjvHxQdu0lGBtYLIVc udm5XGYXOmSiQs643euM8MUB2IDCKA01kHSSOkbL5_WFECYIIoatMgaoh07Z 26howyAOaHkAIaPQN648u18BXeLbEc66WCxqisFnbMeZtqNr4rHbCjzeCRBd pKf0GalNn.Kj.ZkQpZJ.LYIV.Q1lubb33ydXfeqEg067AUgLfZavpLZDoYSW Ognvu41DJ9hKh8MK.eh64E0bh5vAg29yQb1hFgryKGL3qkuSWRqaILgoPrBl abxCE06urT6_wWokhHDdeIyWriW3JuihCJW1kORIbwk7VaPMMB6iZ578lTNi 95T7XUR_YQhWb4K3YD_2HR3zpjmkuEs_xlZA2jngUdu7yaJPHb38VdvpMox4 I40OWzCKicqBhHX2TsMV_tE2Tjp6O78A_66WzOEsIQ6b9ryQM7qDNoGL_Fv9 dggd6qInsyq5ITjhRzDEb69UrETz.6GcHjh8oN3jB08NrR8r8I2_n5T5HH2V grVUzCrFBOKPZFaRUdjlCu9D14ZKkENSWHdtPbNIuazuYyWbDC934VLzVCRm RbHPctZJ0NNulhx7nZiywJCdHb.uZMCG29ksVd1qZV75rTeXQ0UoyicUl23V J9sMj_Lj8VmHxfnz81kI6aQX7ljJrEEA4llRZSL3tg_eCfhm93JSWHUMNVve F3.KEVvleNaMF8Zhrwj4Ts6424JU_VUjFu4C4YPn8xDAy1c.beeaAmw0- Received: from [99.92.109.82] by web181101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:06:40 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,Qm9iJ3MgcmVwbHkgaXMgc29tZXdoYXQgZGlzaW5nZW51b3VzLiAgTUVYIGNhbiByZXByb2R1Y2UgYSBsb2dpY2FsIGZvcm11bGEgZXhhY3RseSwgSSdtIHN1cmUsIGJ1dCB0aGUgZ29hbCBpcyB0byBwcm9kdWNlICpzZW50ZW5jZXMqIHdob3NlIGxvZ2ljYWwgc3RydWN0dXJlIGFyZSB0cmFuc3BhcmVudCBib3RoIGF0IGEgZ2xhbmNlIGFuZCBwcm92YWJseSBhZnRlciBhbmFseXNpcy4gIEFuZCBzdGlsbCBiZSBhIGZ1bmN0aW9uaW5nIGh1bWFuIGxhbmd1YWdlLiAgTG9nbGFuIGlzIGFwcGFyZW50bHkgdGhlIGwBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.696 References: <5eccb6c5-6904-4b30-a49c-455e9bb1d32a@googlegroups.com> <5406CBB8.20305@gmail.com> <1409759095.40258.YahooMailNeo@web181102.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20140903160258.GH585@samsa.fritz.box> <5407A799.3040903@lojban.org> Message-ID: <1409954800.3658.YahooMailNeo@web181101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:06:40 -0700 From: "'John E Clifford' via lojban" Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: criticism of lojban needed To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: <5407A799.3040903@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 216.39.63.95 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Original-From: John E Clifford Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1013620071-1025922250-1409954800=:3658" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --1013620071-1025922250-1409954800=:3658 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bob's reply is somewhat disingenuous. MEX can reproduce a logical formula = exactly, I'm sure, but the goal is to produce *sentences* whose logical str= ucture are transparent both at a glance and provably after analysis. And s= till be a functioning human language. Loglan is apparently the latter, the= question remains whether it is the former. There is, by the way, no doubt= that this is and has been the goal form at least a significant portion of = Lojbanist and Loglanist since the start (albeit somewhat vaguely worded in = the beginning). On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:43 PM, "Bob LeChevalier, President and Fo= under - LLG" wrote: =20 On 9/3/2014 12:30 PM, selpa'i wrote: > la .van. cu cusku >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:44:55AM -0700, 'John E Clifford' via >> lojban wrote: >>> Let's see how that line of objections, rather than ones to the >>> cosmetics, can be met and turned into a positive discussion of >>> Lojban. >> >> I'm sorry, I might have missed something here, but "It's all crap and >> anyone could do better" is no valid criticism pe'i > > If the goal is to make a language that unambiguously encodes logic, then > that's relatively easy to achieve. See xorban for one model that doesn't > add too much unnecessary baggage. Lojban does achieves it too to some > degree, but it has so much extras that most of the language is still > undefined. We cannot easily convert Lojban to logic due to that. I need to note here that if the goal is merely to encode logic, then=20 Lojban can probably be called "successful" in that I believe that=20 anything expressible in logical notation can probably be represented in=20 Mex (the operators needed for any given notation have not been defined,=20 but Mex is defined so as to allow innumerable sets of operators as well=20 as precedences). So far as I know, no one in the community is interested in such a narrow=20 goal. > And what about simplicity? Here Gua\spi and Xorban are the clear > winners, closely followed by Toaq Dzu, and far in the distance comes > Lojban. Just compare the sizes of their grammars to get a rough idea. Of course part of the problem is that very few such languages have been=20 USED to the extent that Lojban has. Feature growth has come from usage. lojbab --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --1013620071-1025922250-1409954800=:3658 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bob's reply is somewhat disingenuous.  MEX ca= n reproduce a logical formula exactly, I'm sure, but the goal is to produce= *sentences* whose logical structure are transparent both at a glance and p= rovably after analysis.  And still be a functioning human language. &n= bsp;Loglan is apparently the latter, the question remains whether it is the= former.  There is, by the way, no doubt that this is and has been the= goal form at least a significant portion of Lojbanist and Loglanist since = the start (albeit somewhat vaguely worded in the beginning).



=
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:43 PM, "Bob Le= Chevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:


On 9/3/2014 12:30= PM, selpa'i wrote:
> la .van. cu cusku
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2= 014 at 08:44:55AM -0700, 'John E Clifford' via
>> lojban wrote:>>> Let's see how that line of objections, rather than ones to th= e
>>> cosmetics, can be met and turned into a positive discussi= on of
>>> Lojban.
>>
>> I'm sorry, I might ha= ve missed something here, but "It's all crap and
>> anyone could do better"= is no valid criticism pe'i
>
> If the goal is to make a langua= ge that unambiguously encodes logic, then
> that's relatively easy to= achieve. See xorban for one model that doesn't
> add too much unnece= ssary baggage. Lojban does achieves it too to some
> degree, but it h= as so much extras that most of the language is still
> undefined. We = cannot easily convert Lojban to logic due to that.

I need to note he= re that if the goal is merely to encode logic, then
Lojban can probably= be called "successful" in that I believe that
anything expressible in = logical notation can probably be represented in
Mex (the operators need= ed for any given notation have not been defined,
but Mex is defined so = as to allow innumerable sets of operators as well
as precedences).
<= br>So far as I know, no one in the community is interested in such a narrow
goal.

> And what about simplicity? Here Gua\spi and X= orban are the clear
> winners, closely followed by Toaq Dzu, and far = in the distance comes
> Lojban. Just compare the sizes of their gramm= ars to get a rough idea.

Of course part of the problem is that very = few such languages have been
USED to the extent that Lojban has.  = Feature growth has come from usage.

lojbab



--
You= received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "loj= ban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro= m it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@goo= glegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://= groups.google.com/d/optout.


=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--1013620071-1025922250-1409954800=:3658--