Received: from mail-qg0-f60.google.com ([209.85.192.60]:58013) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XQU8K-0007eO-Ec for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:31:26 -0700 Received: by mail-qg0-f60.google.com with SMTP id z107sf2751420qgd.15 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=E8FWTgYx/C2Xaey0oyR9YeVYJiqT44Jj8MWR7NXYmgM=; b=hA5Wu9xisaZoIxL2o2/nw8+Mp9BssvZMUKqcdxGeN0hmw4Pkfi9/0xvz7T3OM+q9v7 N4PyaTSEqudO66zcHzXnvVI8lTdMOXSbXcgxlOv8WoK7ojZGRnHxk0xOMMIf0L+JFmug uOfNQkeT6+V3pDnwYwMG4Td2uIH4oH9xCR0kbURA4PHcBh8X5XdoTwWcs+ztSPH9/bDy 27dB14cXkM2G9OwFImpl5pPkfocrYM7T7xOo8upJC5yZ3zBaJ+FM69iUvoRbN2d3NpYG pdtLKrUdkyDzJg2gXCu2g3r9zkWZw1Ez7dkRbsoFySKlPNS/H1pPJb29ydTn7VQyrhfN 1/Mg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=E8FWTgYx/C2Xaey0oyR9YeVYJiqT44Jj8MWR7NXYmgM=; b=amkxQGQifun8AI1cAv2PyhDnoBdz/fK/FsaNnPQXxIwapcfbb4z2htwLeWU9/tcqpL uULxHMB8DMJKpGOxw29WfNFAZ/WwEicPhawugud6c5f0ORm/P/AwuiFT3+Du88Rr6QT/ xjTMl5KWXsVQJlgxR5zUckoGdcfZdYI96Qivgyy3N+qoUA9iEcUthfPvQg7YDSVz5ivE IkszelLiYQtBwDrwb9SuJco+8eWdbN2dXTLxk95PoNExx7JMeKj0JFtx6uEmO9vv3jD1 p/UpKa/uiWTApCk7mlUFqitBjaJu0p5doCX6Hh9aXIKy8z9ImRxwjEq9/VmEDwdxbaAd 4CCg== X-Received: by 10.50.33.4 with SMTP id n4mr164207igi.14.1410064277731; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:31:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.67.48 with SMTP id k16ls1090186igt.24.canary; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:31:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.85.7 with SMTP id d7mr163257igz.9.1410064277433; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 21:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 21:31:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Browne To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4247c0eb-5f03-4608-a27d-099ca48dfd0b@googlegroups.com> References: <3854b8c6-4e18-4b76-9039-d1d5cdbcbb16@googlegroups.com> <4247c0eb-5f03-4608-a27d-099ca48dfd0b@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: What are the official goals of lojban? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: dersaidin@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9978_2026196220.1410064276320" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_9978_2026196220.1410064276320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think having goals is important. The references in the baseline statement support this opinion. If we wanted to specify goals for Lojban now, and preserve the existing language, they would have to apply retrospectively. We would need to choose goals such that the work done during Lojban's development is consistent with them. For example, if we chose the goal "to be syntacticaly unambiguous" (or "to be monoparsing", if you prefer that term) the existing development would certainly be consistent with this example goal. (Side note; I would probably consider the goal in this example to be an instrumental goal, and I would wonder if there is a terminal goal behind it). So to determine (reverse engineer) retroactive goals which are consistent, the question then becomes: What were the unofficial principles/reasons/explanations/justifications for each of Lojban's design/implementation decisions during Lojban's development? This question can best be answered by those who made the design decisions during Lojban's development, but some (partial) answers may be able to be inferred or extracted from explanations in the CLL. An answer to this question covering many design/implementation decisions would be much larger and more detailed than the answer to the question of goals. For those who made the design decisions during Lojban's development, it is probably more reasonable to ask a question with a more general answer: *What were the unofficial principles applied to make design/implementation decisions during Lojban's development?* Andrew / DerSaidin On Sunday, September 7, 2014 2:13:22 PM UTC+10, Andrew Browne wrote: > > > This best answers my original question - we currently don't have official > goals for the language. > > > Andrew / DerSaidin > > > On Monday, June 9, 2014 11:54:43 PM UTC+10, Andrew Browne wrote: >> >> >> What are the official goals of lojban? >> >> So out of all this, what are officially the goals of lojban? >> >> Thanks >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_9978_2026196220.1410064276320 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think having goals is important. The references in = the baseline statement support this opinion. 

If we wanted to specify goals for Lojban now, and preserve the existing la= nguage, they would have to apply retrospectively. We would need to choose g= oals such that the work done during Lojban's development is consistent with= them.

For example, if we chose the goal "to be sy= ntacticaly unambiguous" (or "to be monoparsing", if you prefer that term) t= he existing development would certainly be consistent with this example goa= l.
(Side note; I would probably consider the goal in this example= to be an instrumental goal, and I would wonder if there is a terminal goal= behind it).

So to determine (reverse engineer= ) retroactive goals which are consistent, the question then becomes:
<= div>
What were the unofficial principles/reasons/explanations= /justifications for each of Lojban's design/implementation decisions during= Lojban's development?

This question can best be a= nswered by those who made the design decisions during Lojban's development,= but some (partial) answers may be able to be inferred or extracted from ex= planations in the CLL.

An answer to this question = covering many design/implementation decisions would be much larger and more= detailed than the answer to the question of goals. For those who made the = design decisions during Lojban's development, it is probably more reasonabl= e to ask a question with a more general answer:

What were the unofficial principles applied to make design/implementation = decisions during Lojban's development?

Andrew / DerSaidin



On Su= nday, September 7, 2014 2:13:22 PM UTC+10, Andrew Browne wrote:

This = best answers my original question - we currently don't have official goals = for the language.


Andrew / DerSaidi= n


On Monday, June 9, 2014 11:54:43 PM UTC+10, Andre= w Browne wrote:

What are the official goals of lojban?

So out of all this, what are officially the goals of lojban?

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_9978_2026196220.1410064276320--