Received: from mail-qg0-f60.google.com ([209.85.192.60]:65421) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XRptj-0005j9-1K for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:57 -0700 Received: by mail-qg0-f60.google.com with SMTP id q108sf370959qgd.25 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RSsruo85rkNkM/YXXMY1apUDk1MBqI+w+CudQsHZZmU=; b=RZ/OKLmgA1rDKzqE5oYArtRv1E8jUuX+r20ps4f5zX9d64Q41wUT9c2Q/wmCsvu1jU Yh2gHqegyzZC3JMg0mO/OcWi++sqwCnK/uIDODbK8CE1dZzKfv67n/6AJfNxzl9mOFkR Tu3SPeFsiUdoINsM/nqhpN/VVTfN52p5dmkQue9NqKJUu3c6J83B8XKJ55LllY75mccX jdWR5FNXG8zC/6WTJtekndEIajO4K913+yo6oGty5QZPwyWV0RDybH+4CIiyZtcUZoPS xo/OyOM+B+Cnl3PA+HOEOWV8P7hJwoL0ujNaqQIMfazDjUZc+lKkfSwho5NcMwpfZgtQ +5RQ== X-Received: by 10.50.119.7 with SMTP id kq7mr12680igb.12.1410386268317; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.66.175 with SMTP id g15ls34279igt.42.gmail; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.67.4.231 with SMTP id ch7mr2489829pad.46.1410386267932; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ew8si669607vdb.1.2014.09.10.14.57.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d; Received: by mail-vc0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id le20so5199453vcb.4 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.169.72 with SMTP id x8mr13414966vcy.45.1410386267793; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.204.203 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5410C170.9050007@lojban.org> References: <25B055499F67420FA34794323F9A95AB@gmail.com> <540B374A.9040409@lojban.org> <540B8D1B.8050807@gmail.com> <540F391F.5050002@lojban.org> <5410B0FC.3000507@lojban.org> <5410C170.9050007@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:57:47 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] the future of Lojban's leadership From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1cbbc7cef120502bd242d X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c1cbbc7cef120502bd242d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG wrote: > > I am pretty sure that I would misuse xorlo, if only because I don't know > when NOT to use "lo". It's very easy: always use "lo", you never have to use any other gadri. I believe And may be thinking of something like "mi nelci le nu limna" >> for "I like swimming". The problem with "le" here is that when you say >> "I like swimming" you don't have a particular event of swimming in mind, >> so why would you use "le"? >> > > le is not necessarily singular (or plural), but I certainly have some > concept of what events of swimming (that I am fond of) are, and I am, > referring to one or more of such events. With CLL-le you were saying that you like each one of them, right. but the point is that that's not what "I like swimming" means. Perhaps it's even more clear in the negative: compare "mi na nelci le nu limna" vs "I don't like swimming". > "le nu limna" is supposed to be a particular > >> event of swimming that the speaker has in mind. >> >> (Nowadays many people would probably rather say "mi nelci lo ka limna", >> but the change from "nu" to "ka" is not from xorlo.) >> > > But of course I don't know that my concept of swimming and/or its > properties is the same as yours. Since I still associate "lo" with > veridicality, and there are likely some events of swimming that I would not > nelci, I would have trouble saying "lo". You can use "le" if you think that's important. xorlo didn't touch veridicality, it just dropped the hidden quantifiers. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c1cbbc7cef120502bd242d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - L= LG <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:

=C2=A0I am pretty sure that I would misuse xorlo, if only because I= don't know when NOT to use "lo".

=
It's very easy: always use "lo", you never have to use a= ny other gadri.=C2=A0

I believe And may be thinking of something like "mi nelci le nu limna&= quot;
for "I like swimming". The problem with "le" here is th= at when you say
"I like swimming" you don't have a particular event of swimmi= ng in mind,
so why would you use "le"?

le is not necessarily singular (or plural), but I certainly have some conce= pt of what events of swimming (that I am fond of) are, and I am, referring = to one or more of such events.

With CLL-le = you were saying that you like each one of them, right. but the point is tha= t that's not what "I like swimming" means.

Perhaps it's even more clear in the negative: compare =C2=A0&quo= t;mi na nelci le nu limna" vs "I don't like swimming". = =C2=A0


=C2=A0"le nu limna" is supposed to be a particular
event of swimming that the speaker has in mind.

(Nowadays many people would probably rather say "mi nelci lo ka limna&= quot;,
but the change from "nu" to "ka" is not from xorlo.)

But of course I don't know that my concept of swimming and/or its prope= rties is the same as yours.=C2=A0 Since I still associate "lo" wi= th veridicality, and there are likely some events of swimming that I would = not nelci, I would have trouble saying "lo".
You can use "le" if you think that's important. x= orlo didn't touch veridicality, it just dropped the hidden quantifiers.=

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c1cbbc7cef120502bd242d--