Received: from mail-pd0-f192.google.com ([209.85.192.192]:53454) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XSAG7-00081Y-84 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:24 -0700 Received: by mail-pd0-f192.google.com with SMTP id w10sf1111630pde.29 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kKGN+XDKya9m+yYVb6EUtZ96qkHtiIY7bO8IGFOTnyk=; b=pRkPSvwEnN+wQ0rwqq60WQxoCAxd0FuJPY4zQybe9RP/+eqrj7M2t05cgEqEAHJKdZ T0cQvQaexu6okdVL71dXo9Z+PSX5pfxwzleMSHNcOEvtx4G1Twy6fZ5bdJTCQ+l1arxF IZonhisu8M4KN8BwJbgs2GNzBN6dq5oAiHUH18cfWQqwoXwnP5jUpWFbCg0Gbhunm2et WpPQQUqnL6qDqFcnrGLqUJkxYDqq42DIVXpss9k8B4gczoCaVniGxsuT5dhT8V12YVTv 1k7aSPeMFgKOWtjmb/XXSFZw3u5/wKV5BPQbB7F11BMA1hDfYTLU96XwnNI1yhjiYgEe qtNA== X-Received: by 10.182.241.227 with SMTP id wl3mr25748obc.7.1410464536789; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.105.73 with SMTP id gk9ls131676obb.98.gmail; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.95.40 with SMTP id dh8mr1653525obb.11.1410464535772; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net. [68.230.241.217]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ld1si488176qcb.3.2014.09.11.12.42.13 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=68.230.241.217; Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20140911194212.MUQI19010.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:42:12 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id pviC1o00K1LDWBL01viC2x; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:42:12 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.5411FB14.01AA,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dOd4bplb c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=BGi6d-X4uLYA:10 a=3nxpHsJdzcUA:10 a=VxwYiO3ECrQA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=k595tn4SJHp0Lf4R02QA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <5411FB14.3030807@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:42:12 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] the future of Lojban's leadership References: <25B055499F67420FA34794323F9A95AB@gmail.com> <540B374A.9040409@lojban.org> <540B8D1B.8050807@gmail.com> <540F391F.5050002@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - On 9/10/2014 7:02 PM, TR NS wrote: > On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 1:30:07 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote: > > > This project is some 60 years old and we have a lot of history of > people > explicitly leaving because of changes imposed from on-high. More > importantly, we have the history of dozens if not hundreds of conlangs > whose usage has not spread because people wouldn't stop fiddling with > the language design. Those that have survived and spread have stopped > being developed, and are simply USED. > > > Do you truly believe people would leave the language if a change was > made form "on-high" if it were a clear improvement? Just because it is a > change? Yes, because they would not see it as a clear improvement BECAUSE it is a change (and the reference grammar that they understood as a standard is now declared to be incorrect. Furthermore, I know this from experience, because the change to Loglan called the "Great Morphological Revision" that remade a significant fraction of gismu, but also made possible the assignment of unique rafsi that enabled lujvo to be uniquely decomposed - one of the most fundamental and successful of the Lojban design features inherited from JCB's version of Loglan. That change caused the language community to die for several years, and planted the seeds of schism that eventually and indirectly resulted in creating Lojban. xorlo, which most newer people (apparently excepting gleki) consider a major improvement has been a significant demotivator in my using the language. Probably I wouldn't be using the language much anyway, (I have found that using a language even semi-fluently is extremely difficult for me, even if I know the rules and the words well) but I had translations that I really wanted to do, and I remain unconvinced that anyone will be able to read them because I cannot use xorlo properly. And again, this isn't just me. The advantage and disadvantage of being language-engineer-in-chief, is that everyone for a couple of decades told me their gripes as they arrived and as they gave up/left. People gave up on Loglan because it kept changing. They came back to Lojban because we committed not to keep changing, and to completing a set of language documentation. They then left because we did not complete the documents, many of them saying that they would return when "the language is done". It is the same mindset that has tens of millions still using Microsoft Windows XP, even though it is 10 years out of date and no longer supported by Microsoft. Upgrading to a new version of Windows (or to some other operating system) would take more of a relearning curve than they would want to bother with, and possibly make some of their old stuff unusable. "Clear improvements" simply aren't what they want. lojbab lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.