Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:55444) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XTlgg-0004g2-MA for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:28 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f61.google.com with SMTP id c41sf402940eek.26 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=chzsYpHe4l7fv6Afv2IrODnoylvhgiJi3SHOpPkOFY8=; b=LpR2M1tnlm43wRzi6ocruSgfBYwFjHWJnfq1SW+m4w9xlljQMmbWugMTNA3jkbt+1w fZCDa8fPCiPjdpfrv52CHZTHkkfOaZUa4mUr05ouXnjMaFIA40avS+OXMiJ7tvB+tmT0 mHSWWkVvTYgG1gWX8mPGy/kP9aOflIuwWZKWa7Kjpgu2R7OFqt+uoeUH+OVmKETJNRiA HVcLZgqhMmiRzv1K7KF3JVUptqg+pSV4FQHKMO2+niYPVC6XFqiDjQlRJcffO92QgHcp q4VboP1DZ7tRYfUtdrVugQhw0M/IRcpCjKFJVxVbI8fzIeOAFuCae0ilguTeZYWVbrrO czTg== X-Received: by 10.152.44.229 with SMTP id h5mr1695lam.22.1410846739642; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.10.38 with SMTP id f6ls390289lab.78.gmail; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.190.102 with SMTP id gp6mr141458lbc.10.1410846738465; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7si815088wiz.1.2014.09.15.22.52.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236; Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e4so5511276wiv.3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.89.67 with SMTP id bm3mr40916040wjb.80.1410846738355; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.89.193 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:52:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <541714B1.9080300@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:52:18 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Logos Initiative From: Gleki Arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0102f0b2ac1c450503285a64 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e0102f0b2ac1c450503285a64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-09-16 1:45 GMT+04:00 Jonathan Jones : > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:49 PM, TR NS wrote: >> >> Logla is a means to take on larger potential changes. Things like >> simplified connectives ( >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/lojban/proposal/lojban/ExtEumbYoQg/A5IdZQ9Y5OEJ), >> a simplified rafsi system, even re-consideration of the morphology. >> > > Speaking specifically of the connectives, I myself look forward to the day > when that proposal arrives on the voting block so I can cast my approval. > Simplified connectives (gija, jacu, vauja) is not a reform provided the old connective system continues to be valid. Thus this is a backward compatible change which. it would be more correct to call it "addition". This cannot be said of xorlo, of course. Large changes to Lojban are not impossible. If it's a good idea, then I'm > fairly certain the BPFK would vote it in- not unanimously, I'm sure, we > don't all agree on everything. Not counting the freeze in place until the > baseline is completed, the only thing that would prevent a change- great or > small- to Lojban, is whether or not such a change was verifyably better > than the thing before the change. And, in fact, even the freeze doesn't > prevent change entirely, as xorlo happened even with the freeze, which > seems to me to say that xorlo's changes are so obviously better than the > previous state that waiting for the baseline was just not worth it. > > Admittedly, I don't think it very likely that a change proposal for the > morphology would be very likely, but again, that really depends on the > change itself. I mean, everyone knows the mekso portion of it is completely > borked right now, so if someone managed to come up with a mekso that > wasn't, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see it voted in. > > But even so, there are a lot of things I've seen proposed during my time > here that I would expect would likely get passed were they ever formally > put to the BPFK. Off the top of my head, changing the meaning of sa (it > currently means "erase previous up to point of following word's class" as > in {mi nelci lonu plise sa lo plise}, but in my admittedly limited > experience people tend to use it as "replace that typo with this word" as > in {mi klama fo lo karce sa fu}), making kibro, lo'ai, sa'ai, le'ai official > Again additions, not core-changing proposals. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e0102f0b2ac1c450503285a64 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-09-16 1:45 GMT+04:00 Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>:
=
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 = at 2:49 PM, TR NS <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
Logla is a mean= s to take on larger potential changes. Things like simplified connectives (= https://groups.google.com/for= um/#!searchin/lojban/proposal/lojban/ExtEumbYoQg/A5IdZQ9Y5OEJ), a simpl= ified rafsi system, even re-consideration of the morphology.

S= peaking specifically of the connectives, I myself look forward to the day w= hen that proposal arrives on the voting block so I can cast my approval.

Simplified connectives (gija, ja= cu, vauja) =C2=A0is not a reform provided the old connective system continu= es to be valid.
Thus this is a backward compatible change which. = it would be more correct to call it "addition".

This cannot be said of xorlo, of course.

Large = changes to Lojban are not impossible. If it's a good idea, then I'm= fairly certain the BPFK would vote it in- not unanimously, I'm sure, w= e don't all agree on everything. Not counting the freeze in place until= the baseline is completed, the only thing that would prevent a change- gre= at or small- to Lojban, is whether or not such a change was verifyably bett= er than the thing before the change. And, in fact, even the freeze doesn= 9;t prevent change entirely, as xorlo happened even with the freeze, which = seems to me to say that xorlo's changes are so obviously better than th= e previous state that waiting for the baseline was just not worth it.
Admittedly, I don't think it very likely that a change proposal for t= he morphology would be very likely, but again, that really depends on the c= hange itself. I mean, everyone knows the mekso portion of it is completely = borked right now, so if someone managed to come up with a mekso that wasn&#= 39;t, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see it voted in.

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">But even so, there are a lot of things I've s= een proposed during my time here that I would expect would likely get passe= d were they ever formally put to the BPFK. Off the top of my head, changing= the meaning of sa (it currently means "erase previous up to point of = following word's class" as in {mi nelci lonu plise sa lo plise}, b= ut in my admittedly limited experience people tend to use it as "repla= ce that typo with this word" as in {mi klama fo lo karce sa fu}), maki= ng kibro, lo'ai, sa'ai, le'ai official
=

Again additions, not core-changing proposals.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e0102f0b2ac1c450503285a64--