Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: TR NS <transfire@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <8057b400-6d10-4229-90a9-1f1947c56a9e@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <5418C71D.5010006@gmail.com>
References: <e0b23cf5-5a67-4a9b-8db0-7d310eb4116e@googlegroups.com> <541714B1.9080300@gmail.com> <rWNr1o03N56Cr6M01WNtCG> <54186D9D.1030600@lojban.org> <27b823dc-ad5c-42a9-ab81-03ad12babb42@googlegroups.com>
 <5418C71D.5010006@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Logos Initiative
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_9_2004730496.1410910430710"
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_9_2004730496.1410910430710
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:26:10 PM UTC-4, And Rosta wrote:
>
> TR NS, On 16/09/2014 22:36: 
> > On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:39:34 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote: 
> >     Look at guaspi and Voksigid for prior efforts to 
> >     reconsider Lojban. 
> > 
> > 
> > I have looked at those. Any tonal language (IMHO) is doomed from the 
> > get go. Voksigid had some good ideas, but never really got off the 
> > ground. And I have looked an many many more. 
>
> Many many more of what? Efforts to reconsider Lojban? Even if you broaden 
> that to include loglangs in general, are there actually many many more, 
> rather than merely a very few more? 
>
>  
I just meant many conlangs. But you're right, given the context, I should 
have limited it to loglangs, which would be a few more.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_9_2004730496.1410910430710
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<div dir="ltr"><br><br>On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:26:10 PM UTC-4, And Rosta wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">TR NS, On 16/09/2014 22:36:
<br>&gt; On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:39:34 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote:
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; Look at guaspi and Voksigid for prior efforts to
<br>&gt; &nbsp; &nbsp; reconsider Lojban.
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; I have looked at those. Any tonal language (IMHO) is doomed from the
<br>&gt; get go. Voksigid had some good ideas, but never really got off the
<br>&gt; ground. And I have looked an many many more.
<br>
<br>Many many more of what? Efforts to reconsider Lojban? Even if you broaden that to include loglangs in general, are there actually many many more, rather than merely a very few more?
<br>
<br></blockquote><div>&nbsp;</div><div>I just meant many conlangs. But you're right, given the context, I should have limited it to loglangs, which would be a few more.</div><div><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http://groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_9_2004730496.1410910430710--