Received: from mail-ob0-f190.google.com ([209.85.214.190]:45183) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XUP4P-0005nV-RA for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:34 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f190.google.com with SMTP id va2sf22212obc.7 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4KnDDM6eoJwFr449PcTU5177J6ZHoB/g5imHUk/3Bi0=; b=ZOOwBMLJGzQeB4jTWFS3zlJkvkOJyhKPg1m+HKIwIATWO9woHo2bgi9gY5OHW5+BUS CqQEBb4/6x+f2N5zw6BO6lRWp0nrhB+ihe/qbTYPOgnr0nQ6iIuUa1YZWgcx39brMmYx KRxMUZwHOuqrTGPZXHN1LYjb+IJ0lF9SDY9HtJ+zb2n/oyz/j8JnDV7Sq+fXuTLq+ioY EcILnZ2Lcy3hSoIOgBMbQJDo633OYZ+6jAWT3UToyiwuDBHO+KGHZ0ZNYRYby1g4IvHa T4p8R3Z5JT083l48wx3XZT/62kaezTh4PQmKYo3IoLOOTqcgEsZjhJl/JbgiI47We0cu rmRw== X-Received: by 10.183.1.34 with SMTP id bd2mr16290obd.6.1410998127612; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.22.99 with SMTP id c3ls416724obf.24.gmail; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.56.200 with SMTP id c8mr709692obq.7.1410998127032; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6si2015228qcd.0.2014.09.17.16.55.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235; Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r5so147532qcx.40 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.73.132 with SMTP id q4mr1599438qaj.78.1410998126911; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.201.74 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4868f468-7560-4510-a3df-7d0a15def5c7@googlegroups.com> References: <5ebfd7de-df4d-4bac-90e9-08d182557c8c@googlegroups.com> <863e6344-9008-44be-8546-eed800c0a630@googlegroups.com> <1410966712.92433.YahooMailNeo@web181105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4868f468-7560-4510-a3df-7d0a15def5c7@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:55:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Growth and decline in lojbanistan From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: Mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3e14222446e05034b9a86 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c3e14222446e05034b9a86 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Did you do any metrics on jbo.wikipedia ? On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, mukti wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:11:54 PM UTC-3, clifford wrote: > >> There was then a dearth of interesting problems for a while. I am not >> sure that that one controversy and its two main participants should be used >> to make any general claims about Lojban's popularity, etc. >> > > To be clear, I'm not trying to measure *popularity* so much as *activity *-- > not how many people have been exposed to lojban or what their sentiments > are towards it, but rather, the extent to which people are actively > discussing and using lojban. For these purposes, an extended debate about > some aspect of lojban is a positive indicator. A lack of "interesting > problems" -- problems and/or interest -- registers as a negative > indication. (Disgusted silence would also count as a negative -- it seems > to me that it ought to!) > > Activity is a difficult thing to measure. Gleki suggested including tiki > edits, which ties in with lojbab's observations about how communications > have diffused across different channels over time. I'm interested to hear > other suggestions about how to construct a more complete account of the use > of lojban over time. It's my hope that such measurements can play a part in > future policy discussions. > > mi'e la mukti mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c3e14222446e05034b9a86 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Did you do any metrics on jbo.wikipedia ?


On Wed, Sep 1= 7, 2014 at 6:53 PM, mukti <shunpiker@gmail.com> wrote:
=
On We= dnesday, September 17, 2014 12:11:54 PM UTC-3, clifford wrote:
There was then a dearth of = interesting problems for a while. =C2=A0I am not sure that that one controv= ersy and its two main participants should be used to make any general claim= s about Lojban's popularity, etc.
=

To be clear, I'm not trying to measure=C2=A0= popularity=C2=A0so much as=C2=A0activity=C2=A0-- not how many= people have been exposed to lojban or what their sentiments are towards it= , but rather, the extent to which people are actively discussing and using = lojban. For these purposes, an extended debate about some aspect of lojban = is a positive indicator. A lack of "interesting problems" -- prob= lems and/or interest -- registers as a negative indication. (Disgusted sile= nce would also count as a negative -- it seems to me that it ought to!)

Activity is a difficult thing to measure. Gleki sugge= sted including tiki edits, which ties in with lojbab's observations abo= ut how communications have diffused across different channels over time. I&= #39;m interested to hear other suggestions about how to construct a more co= mplete account of the use of lojban over time. It's my hope that such m= easurements can play a part in future policy discussions.

mi'e la mukti mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c3e14222446e05034b9a86--